Shapes of phases in isothermal phase diagrams: what is wrong with the Thermo-Calc logo
Source abstract
Abstract
The solubility of defects is essential to control the mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of engineering materials. The concentration of defects can be visualized on a phase diagram as providing the width to single-phase regions of compounds. Although the shape of these regions can have a tremendous impact on the maximum defect solubility achievable and guides the engineering of materials, little attention has been paid to the shape of the phase boundaries surrounding these single-phase regions. Here we examine the shape of single-phase boundaries that can be expected for dominating neutral substitutional defects. Single-phase regions in an isothermal phase diagram should be expected to be concave or star-shaped, or at least straight polygonal sides rather than be convex-like droplets. A thermodynamic justification is used to show the concave (hyperbolic cosine) shape depends on the thermodynamic stability of the compound when various substitutional defects dominate. More stable compounds have star-like phase regions, while barely stable compounds should be more polygonal shaped. The Thermo-Calc logo for example would be more physical if it contained a star-like central compound and pointed elemental regions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Commerce
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Jastrzebski · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1982 · 29 · 47510.1109/T-ED.1982.20729 ↗
2. Bracht · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 2210.1557/mrs2000.94 ↗
3. Kolbesen · Solid-State Electron. · 1982 · 25 · 75910.1016/0038-1101(82)90206-4 ↗
4. Y. Yoshida and G. Langouche , ed. Defects and impurities in silicon materials: an introduction to atomic-level silicon engineering , Springer , Tokyo , 2015
5. Bi · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 283 · 21110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.095 ↗
6. Liu · J. Power Sources · 1999 · 81–82 · 41610.1016/S0378-7753(99)00221-9 ↗
7. W.Cai , W. D.Nix and M. R.Society , Imperfections in crystalline solids , Cambridge University Press , 201610.1017/CBO9781316389508 ↗
8. R. J. D.Tilley , Defects in solids , Wiley , Hoboken, NJ , 200810.1002/9780470380758 ↗
9. Janotti · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2009 · 72 · 12650110.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501 ↗
10. Lu · Chem. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 40810.1021/cm502570b ↗
11. Zhao · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 334610.1039/c3ee42187b ↗
12. Pei · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 612510.1002/adma.201202919 ↗
13. Gurunathan · Mater. Horiz. · 2020 · 7 · 145210.1039/C9MH01990A ↗
14. Anand · Acc. Mater. Res. · 2022 · 3 · 68510.1021/accountsmr.2c00044 ↗
15. Edwards · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 170610.1063/1.118676 ↗
16. Richards · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8 · 170153310.1002/aenm.201701533 ↗
17. Ouyang · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 10 · 190324010.1002/aenm.201903240 ↗
18. Tang · Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 122310.1038/nmat4430 ↗
19. Wood · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 11 · 210018110.1002/aenm.202100181 ↗
20. Isotta · Mater. Today Phys. · 2023 · 31 · 10096710.1016/j.mtphys.2023.100967 ↗
21. Olson · Science · 1997 · 277 · 123710.1126/science.277.5330.1237 ↗
22. Olson · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 70 · 2510.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.08.032 ↗
23. Adekoya · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 119 · 20210110.1063/5.0069327 ↗
24. N.Saunders and A. P.Miodownik , CALPHAD (calculation of phase diagrams): a comprehensive guide , Pergamon , Oxford; New York , 1998
25. Andersson · Calphad · 2002 · 26 · 27310.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 ↗
26. Van de Walle · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 385110.1063/1.1682673 ↗
27. Anand · Mater. Horiz. · 2021 · 8 · 196610.1039/D1MH00397F ↗
28. Anand · Chem. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 163810.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03715 ↗
29. Toriyama · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 2068510.1039/D1TA05112A ↗
30. Freysoldt · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2014 · 86 · 25310.1103/RevModPhys.86.253 ↗
31. Baranowski · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 495110.1021/cm501339v ↗
32. Gibbs · Am. J. Sci. · 1878 · s3–16 · 44110.2475/ajs.s3-16.96.441 ↗
33. Doak · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2015 · 3 · 1063010.1039/C5TC02252E ↗
34. Bajaj · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 176910.1039/C5TC03970C ↗
35. Sundman · MRS Proc. · 1982 · 19 · 11510.1557/PROC-19-115 ↗
36. Kattner · Tecnol. Metal., Mater. Min. · 2016 · 13 · 310.4322/2176-1523.1059 ↗
37. Hillert · Acta Chem. Scand. · 1970 · 24 · 361810.3891/acta.chem.scand.24-3618 ↗
38. H.Lukas , S. G.Fries and B.Sundman , Computational Thermodynamics: The Calphad Method , Cambridge University Press , 200710.1017/CBO9780511804137 ↗
39. Li · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 663410.1039/D0TA12620A ↗
40. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
41. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
42. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
43. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
44. Jain · APL Mater. · 2013 · 1 · 01100210.1063/1.4812323 ↗
45. Hillert · J. Alloys Compd. · 2001 · 320 · 16110.1016/S0925-8388(00)01481-X ↗
46. Dinsdale · Calphad · 1991 · 15 · 31710.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
47. Anand · Chem. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 163810.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03715 ↗