Enhancing the mechanical performance of DLP-printed HAp scaffolds: Impact of 72.5 wt% solid loading on achieving cortical-bone-level strength
Source abstract
Abstract
This work establishes a new performance benchmark for DLP-printed hydroxyapatite (HAp) scaffolds by realizing a record-tier solid loading of 72.5 wt%, yielding an unprecedented compressive strength of ∼ 130.08 MPa and hardness of 3.59 GPa, surpassing all previously reported 3D-printed HAp materials. To overcome the rheological challenges of ultra-high ceramic loading, we developed a tailored slurry using 5 wt% BYK-180 and a black photoabsorber to achieve optimal flowability and precise light-scattering control. A strategic two-stage thermal protocol was engineered to ensure complete organic removal and near-theoretical densification (0.8% porosity) while preserving phase purity. The resulting scaffolds exhibit superior dimensional accuracy and structural integrity across complex architectures. Biological evaluations with MC3T3-E1 cells confirm robust cell adhesion, sustained proliferation, and enhanced osteogenic differentiation. By redefining the upper limits of both solid loading and structural integrity, this work provides a validated, scalable route for manufacturing high-performance, patient-specific bioceramic implants for advanced bone repair.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Osteoporosis and orthopedic surgery: effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome10.1007/s11926-013-0371-x ↗
2. Osteoarthritis10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9 ↗
3. Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques10.1007/s00586-008-0648-3 ↗
4. Autologous bone graft in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s12891-016-1312-4 ↗
5. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology—is it still a “gold standard”? a consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures10.1186/s40729-017-0084-4 ↗
6. Transmission of disease through transplantation of musculoskeletal allografts10.2106/00004623-199511000-00017 ↗
7. Infection in bone marrow transplant recipients10.1016/0002-9343(86)90511-5 ↗
8. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions10.1186/1749-799X-9-18 ↗
9. Decellularized xenografts in regenerative medicine: from processing to clinical application10.1111/xen.12683 ↗
10. The processing of xenografts will result in different clinical responses10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.004 ↗
11. Bone graft substitutes: current concepts and future expectations10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.032 ↗
12. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials–from space holders to innovative biomaterials10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002 ↗
13. Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration10.1038/s41413-021-00180-y ↗
14. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: current status and future perspectives10.1055/a-1073-8473 ↗
15. Ratner · 2004
16. Stainless steels in orthopedics
17. Titanium and titanium alloys as biomaterials
18. A review on manufacturing processes of cobalt‐chromium alloy implants and its impact on corrosion resistance and biocompatibility10.1002/jbm.b.35431 ↗
19. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface
20. Analysis of stress shielding reduction in bone fracture fixation implant using functionally graded materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117262 ↗
21. The effects on bone cells of metal ions released from orthopaedic implants. a review
22. Potential release of in vivo trace metals from metallic medical implants in the human body: from ions to nanoparticles–a systematic analytical review10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.027 ↗
23. Biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering10.1007/978-3-319-61288-1_2 ↗
24. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 ↗
25. Benatti, A. C. B., Pattaro, A. F., Rodrigues, A. A., Xavier, M. V., Kaasi, A., Barbosa, M. I. R., Jardini, A. L., Maciel Filho, R., & Kharmandayan, P. (2019). Bioreabsorbable polymers for tissue engineering: PLA, PGA, and their copolymers. In Materials for biomedical engineering (pp. 83-116). Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-816901-8.00004-3 ↗
26. Polylactic acid based nanocomposites: Promising safe and biodegradable materials in biomedical field
27. Polylactide (PLA)-based nanocomposites10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 ↗
28. Azevedo, H. S., & Reis, R. L. (2005). Understanding the enzymatic degradation of biodegradable polymers and strategies to control their degradation rate. In (Vol. 1, pp. 177-201): CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.10.1201/9780203491232.ch12 ↗
29. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346 ↗
30. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
31. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion
32. A model for hydrolytic degradation and erosion of biodegradable polymers10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.023 ↗
33. Scaffold degradation in bone tissue engineering: an overview10.1016/j.ibiod.2023.105599 ↗
34. Comparing alveolar bone regeneration using Bio-Oss and autogenous bone grafts in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis
35. Alumina and zirconia ceramics in joint replacements
36. Alumina and zirconia ceramic for orthopaedic and dental devices
37. Calcium phosphate ceramics as bone graft substitutes in filling bone tumor defects10.4103/0019-5413.39588 ↗
38. Park · 2009 · Vol. 741
39. Toughening of bioceramic composites for bone regeneration10.3390/jcs5100259 ↗
40. Alumina-and zirconia-based ceramics for load-bearing applications10.1016/B978-0-12-394619-5.00011-0 ↗
41. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008 ↗
42. The use of dense alumina–alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement10.1002/jbm.820221210 ↗
43. Hydroxyapatite: a journey from biomaterials to advanced functional materials10.1016/j.cis.2023.103013 ↗
44. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes10.1080/07853890701881788 ↗
45. Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: present and future trends10.1080/17452750903476288 ↗
46. 3D printing of ceramics: a review10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 ↗
47. A review of 3D printed porous ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.02.039 ↗
48. State-of-the-art research progress and challenge of the printing techniques, potential applications for advanced ceramic materials 3D printing
49. 3D printing bioinspired ceramic composites10.1038/s41598-017-14236-9 ↗
50. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities, and opportunities10.1111/jace.13700 ↗
51. 3D printing of ceramics: Advantages, challenges, applications, and perspectives10.1111/jace.20043 ↗
52. Three-dimensional printing of large-scale, high-resolution bioceramics with micronano inner porosity and customized surface characterization design for bone regeneration10.1021/acsami.1c22868 ↗
53. Digital light processing of high-strength hydroxyapatite ceramics: Role of particle size and printing parameters on microstructural defects and mechanical properties10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.11.047 ↗
54. Kooanantkul · 2020
55. DLP fabrication of zirconia scaffolds coated with HA/β-TCP layer: role of scaffold architecture on mechanical and biological properties10.3390/jfb13030148 ↗
56. Flow channel performance in 3D printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds to improve metabolism and tissue ingrowth in flat bone repair10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110727 ↗
57. Fabrication of zirconia all‐ceramic crown via DLP‐based stereolithography10.1111/ijac.13441 ↗
58. A 3D printed ultra-short dental implant based on lattice structures and ZIRCONIA/Ca2SiO4 combination10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106559 ↗
59. Mullite 3D Printed Humidity Sensors10.3390/ceramics7020053 ↗
60. Biomimetic porous silicon oxycarbide ceramics with improved specific strength and efficient thermal insulation10.1016/j.jmst.2023.06.006 ↗
61. Influence of irradiation parameters on the curing and interfacial tensile strength of HAP printed part fabricated by SLA-3D printing10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.019 ↗
62. Biocompatibility and osteointegration capability of β-TCP manufactured by stereolithography 3D printing: In vitro study
63. Bilyalov, A., Piatnitskaia, S., Rafikova, G., Akbashev, V., Bikmeyev, A., Akhatov ISh, S. O., Chugunov, S., & Tikhonov, A. (2025). THE EFFECT OF STERILIZATION METHODS ON THE CYTOTOXICITY OF CERAMIC MEDICAL IMPLANTS.10.24075/brsmu.2025.009 ↗
64. Personalizing β-TCP porous scaffolds to promote osteogenesis: a study of segmental femoral defects in beagle models10.1088/1748-605X/ad98d8 ↗
65. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO2 crowns with different build directions10.4012/dmj.2022-041 ↗
66. Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite: effect of some stereolithography parameters on the dimensional accuracy of green, debinded and sintered parts with different geometries10.1088/1742-6596/2487/1/012042 ↗
67. SiC paste with high curing thickness for stereolithography10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.183 ↗
68. Effect of particle size distribution on the preparation of ZTA ceramic paste applying for stereolithography 3D printing10.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.066 ↗
69. Design and manufacture of a customized, large-size and high-strength bioactive HA osteoid composite ceramic by stereolithography10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.010 ↗
70. Preparation of high-performance ZrO2 bio-ceramics by stereolithography for dental restorations10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.052 ↗
71. Ti–6Al–4V complex shape production by spark plasma sintering with ceramic–metal sacrificial powder and interface 3D printing
72. 3D printed magnesium-doped β-TCP gyroid scaffold with osteogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation properties and bone regeneration capability in vivo10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212759 ↗
73. Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of high-performance osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics by a digital light-processing system10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01663 ↗
74. Fabrication and biological evaluation of 3D-printed calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds with distinct macroporous geometries through digital light processing technology10.1093/rb/rbac005 ↗
75. 3D printing calcium phosphate ceramics with high osteoinductivity through pore architecture optimization10.1016/j.actbio.2024.07.008 ↗
76. Effect of polystyrene addition on properties of porous Si3N4 ceramics fabricated by digital light processing10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.246 ↗
77. Microwave dielectric properties of (0.75 ZnAl2O4–0.25 TiO2)–MgTiO3 ceramics prepared using digital light processing technology10.1111/jace.18409 ↗
78. Microstructure and properties evolution of silicon-based ceramic cores fabricated by 3D printing with stair-stepping effect control10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.036 ↗
79. Controlled anisotropy in 3D printing of silica-based ceramic cores through oxidization reaction of aluminum powders10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.013 ↗
80. Preparation of porous lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramics via vat photopolymerization combined with burnt polymer spheres technique
81. 3D-printed HA-based scaffolds for bone regeneration: Microporosity, osteoconduction and osteoclastic resorption10.3390/ma15041433 ↗
82. Magnaterra, G. (2020). Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone repair Politecnico di Torino].
83. Digital light processing stereolithography of hydroxyapatite scaffolds with bone‐like architecture, permeability, and mechanical properties10.1111/jace.17843 ↗
84. Impact of post printing cleaning methods on geometry, transmission, roughness parameters, and flexural strength of 3D-printed zirconia10.1016/j.dental.2023.05.005 ↗
85. Effects of the layer height and exposure energy on the lateral resolution of zirconia parts printed by lithography-based additive manufacturing10.3390/ma13061317 ↗
86. Additive manufacturing of dense alumina ceramics10.1111/ijac.12319 ↗
87. Characterization of the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone cells on hybrid β-TCP/ZrO2 structures10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112687 ↗
88. Influence of β-tricalcium phosphate dispersion on mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite ceramics10.2109/jcersj2.116.1002 ↗
89. Honeycomb blocks composed of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration: effects of composition on biological responses
90. Influence of particle size distribution on hydroxyapatite slurry and scaffold properties fabricated using digital light processing10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.036 ↗
91. A review on the rheological behavior and formulations of ceramic suspensions for vat photopolymerization10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.031 ↗
92. Trembecka-Wójciga, K., & Ortyl, J. (2024). Enhancing 3D printed ceramic components: The function of dispersants, adhesion promoters, and surface-active agents in Photopolymerization-based additive manufacturing. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 103251.10.1016/j.cis.2024.103251 ↗
93. The hidden property of Arrhenius-type relationship: viscosity as a function of temperature
94. Optimization of rheological properties of photopolymerizable alumina suspensions for ceramic microstereolithography10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.09.059 ↗
95. Effects of UV absorber on zirconia fabricated with digital light processing additive manufacturing10.3390/ma15248726 ↗
96. Improving the accuracy of stereolithography 3D printed Al2O3 microcomponents by adding photoabsorber: fundamentals and experiments10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.309 ↗
97. Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds: Dispersion, digital light processing, sintering, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility10.1007/s40145-020-0375-8 ↗
98. Development and characterization of UV curable epoxy/hydroxyapatite suspensions for stereolithography applied to bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.117 ↗
99. SLA-3d printing and compressive strength of PEGDA/nHAP biomaterials10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.047 ↗
100. Preparation of large-size alumina ceramic parts by DLP 3D printing using high-solid-loading paste and optimizing the debinding process10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.142 ↗