Comparison of fracture toughness of 9Cr-1W-0.3Ti ODS steel clad material evaluated using three different η and γ factors
Source abstract
Abstract
9Cr-1 W-0.3Ti ferritic martensitic (FM) Oxide Dispersed Strengthened (ODS) steel is a candidate clad material for France’s future sodium-cooled fast breeder reactor. Fracture toughness of the FM ODS steel evaluated using pin-loaded tension (PLT) is already reported, which was evaluated using η pl and γ pl factors estimated by the domain integral (DI) method. The fracture toughness was re-evaluated again using η pl and γ pl factors estimated by the load separation (LS) method, and using η pl and γ pl factors reported in the literature estimated by the limit load (LL) method, and it was compared with the value already reported. The accuracy of the η pl and γ pl factors estimated by the LS method, relative to the DI and LL methods, is discussed in terms of their similarity to the compact tension specimen and the insensitivity of J IC obtained using LS-derived factors to a/W . Although the η pl and γ pl factors from the DI, LS, and LL methods differed, all three yielded nearly identical J IC values, indicating that any method can be used for single-value fracture toughness, while LS method derived factors are recommended when a complete J-R curve is required for safety analysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Technology roadmap update for Generation IV nuclear energy systems. Generation IV International Forum, Paris, 2014.
2. Core materials for sodium-cooled fast reactors: past to present and future prospects10.1520/MPC20200208 ↗
3. https://www.gen-4.org/generation-iv-criteria-and-technologies/sodium-fast-reactor-sfr.
4. Fast breeder reactors in France10.1080/08929880902953013 ↗
5. https://www.gen-4.org/generation-iv-criteria-and-technologies.
6. Materials for future nuclear energy systems10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151837 ↗
7. S.J. Zinkle, in: NEA Workshop Proceedings, Karlsruhe, 4–6 June 2007.
8. Structural materials challenges for advanced reactor systems10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.026 ↗
9. Structural materials for liquid metal cooled fast reactor fuel assemblies — Operational Behaviour, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NF-T-4.3, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2012).
10. Séran · 2017 · 285
11. Henry · 2017 · 329
12. Creep and damage anisotropies of 9%Cr and 14%Cr ODS steel cladding10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.041 ↗
13. Anisotropic intergranular damage development and fracture in a 14Cr ferritic ODS steel under high-temperature tension and creep10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.102 ↗
14. Assessment of a new fabrication route for Fe–9Cr–1W ODS cladding tubes10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.12.013 ↗
15. Determination of the fracture toughness of a 9Cr ODS steel fuel cladding using the pin loading tension test10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109499 ↗
16. Advanced materials for indian future nuclear energy systems
17. Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates
18. A J integral analysis for the compact specimen considering axial force as well as bending effects10.1115/1.3454183 ↗
19. Evaluation of estimation procedures used in J-integral testing
20. Evaluation of the J-integral for the compact specimen10.1520/JTE10222J ↗
21. Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001 ↗
22. JC determination for shallow notch welded bend specimens10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00498.x ↗
23. Derivation of ‘γ’ parameter from limit load expression of cracked component to evaluate J-R curve10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00053-9 ↗
24. Prediction of J-R curves of thin-walled fuel pin specimens in a PLT setup10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.008 ↗
25. J and CTOD estimation equations for shallow cracks in single edge notched bend specimens10.1520/JTE11948J ↗
26. Numerical investigation of 3-D constraint effect on brittle fracture in SE(B) and C(T) specimens10.1007/BF00036262 ↗
27. Further results in J and CTOD estimation procedures for SE(T) fracture specimens – part I: homogeneous materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.11.003 ↗
28. Investigation of plastic eta factors for clamped SE(T) specimens based on three-dimensional finite element analyses
29. A J -integral approach to development of -factors
30. The load separation criterion and methodology in ductile fracture mechanics10.1007/BF00032571 ↗
31. Development of eta factors in elastic-plastic fracture testing using a load separation technique
32. The load separation and ηpl development in precracked specimen test records
33. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness – Designation: ASTM E1820-22.
34. Relation of ηpl and γpl with separation parameter (S) and their usefulness for fracture toughness evaluation10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109487 ↗
35. Load separability and ηpl factor determination for CT specimen of Zr-2.5Nb pressure tube material
36. Load separation in 17 mm wide CT specimen of Zr-2.5Nb pressure tube material10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.466 ↗
37. A.K. Bind, Y. Huang, R.N. Singh, ηpl and γpl factors calculation of clamped SENT specimen using load separation method, INSIC-2023 (2023) Mumbai, India.
38. Systematic estimation of ηpl factor using load separation analysis in discrete intervals
39. A pin-loading tension test for evaluation of thin-walled tubular materials10.1016/0956-716X(95)00110-H ↗
40. Fracture toughness of zircaloy cladding tubes
41. A novel fracture toughness testing method for irradiated tubing-experimental results and 3D numerical evaluation
42. Estimation of fracture behavior of thin walled nuclear reactor fuel pins using pin-loading-tension (PLT) test10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.09.030 ↗
43. Investigation of the fracture mechanics properties of small tubes from oxide dispersion strengthened steels10.37358/RC.18.12.6786 ↗
44. Fracture toughness of hydrided zircaloy-4 experimental and numerical study
45. Delayed hydrogen cracking velocity and J-integral measurements on irradiated BWR cladding10.1520/JAI12434 ↗
46. D. Kim, S.J. Baik, B.O. Yoo, Y.S. Choo, S.B. Ahn, Y.B. Chun, Ductility and fracture toughness test techniques of irradiated cladding in a hot cell. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting Gyeongju, Korea, May 29-30, 2008.
47. Plastic J-integral calculations using the load separation method for the center cracked tension specimen10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00134-5 ↗
48. Plastic J-integral calculations using the load separation method for the double edge notch tension specimen10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.08.010 ↗
49. T. Beck, V. Blanc, J.-M. Escleine, M. Pelletier, M. Phelip, B. Perrin, Pre-conceptual design of ASTRID fuel sub-assemblies, ICAPP 2016 - International Congress on Advances Nuclear Power Plants, Apr 2016, San Francisco, United States. Paper 16163. hal-02445706.
50. Fracture toughness evaluation of Zr-2.5Nb pressure tubes manufactured employing double forging for PHWR70010.1520/MPC20130072 ↗