Microbial synthesis of nano-selenium and nano-titanium dioxide: mechanisms of selenite respiration
Source abstract
Abstract
The unique physicochemical properties of nano-metals compared with those of non-nanomaterials have led to many investigations in recent decades. Nano-titanium dioxide has been chiefly applied in novel implant forms. Also, the structures of selenium-containing compounds play a critical role in the biological activity of these elements. According to recent studies, nano-selenium is not only less toxic, but also has a higher biological activity than selenium ions such as selenium (IV) (Se4+) and selenium (VI) (Se6+). Researchers have turned to green nanostructure synthesis due to the drawbacks of chemical techniques. This paper presents a literature review on recent advances in microbial synthesis methods for producing nano-selenium and nano-titanium dioxide. Despite numerous research articles on green nanoparticle production, little information has been provided on the microbial formation of titanium and selenium nanoparticles. This review paper focuses on the possible mechanism of nano-selenium production by selenium respiration. Although there are reports of microbial synthesis of these particles, their production by probiotic bacteria is of great value. Considering the compatibility of probiotic bacteria with the immune system and their tremendous applications in medicine, it is suggested to use them in combination with nano-titanium dioxide and nano-selenium for various ends such as implant scaffolds and food additives, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Selenium in Biological Systems · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8RA10483B10.1039/C8RA10483B ↗
2. 10.1039/C9RA02225B10.1039/C9RA02225B ↗
3. 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.12.03110.1016/j.molliq.2017.12.031 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12011-020-02138-310.1007/s12011-020-02138-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12288010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122880 ↗
6. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0029210.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00292 ↗
7. 10.1186/s12951-021-00834-310.1186/s12951-021-00834-3 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11671-007-9060-x10.1007/s11671-007-9060-x ↗
9. Behtash Ladan SA · Cellular and Molecular Biology · 2012 · 2 · 83
10. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00258.x10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00258.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jddst.2017.11.01710.1016/j.jddst.2017.11.017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.01.01810.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.01.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.10.05110.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.10.051 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.045 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.11810.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.118 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3cc42475h10.1039/c3cc42475h ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.02510.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.025 ↗
18. Zommara MA · Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Sciences · 2020 · 46 · 77
19. 10.1007/s10876-019-01705-610.1007/s10876-019-01705-6 ↗
20. Eszenyi P · International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry, Bioinformatics · 2011 · 1 · 148
21. Kaur R · Research Journal of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics, Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences · 2018 · 4 · 291
22. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.73457110.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734571 ↗
23. El-Batal AI · Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · 2014 · 27 · 1364
24. 10.1088/2053-1591/aaabeb10.1088/2053-1591/aaabeb ↗
25. 10.1186/1475-2859-12-7510.1186/1475-2859-12-75 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.10.00710.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.10.007 ↗
27. 10.3390/jof703019510.3390/jof7030195 ↗
28. 10.1128/MMBR.00037-1410.1128/MMBR.00037-14 ↗
29. 10.1111/1751-7915.1237410.1111/1751-7915.12374 ↗
30. 10.1042/BA2010004210.1042/BA20100042 ↗
31. Zare B · Nanomedicine Journal · 2013 · 1 · 13
32. 10.1016/j.jopr.2013.01.02210.1016/j.jopr.2013.01.022 ↗
33. 10.1007/s40195-013-0217-610.1007/s40195-013-0217-6 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10854-017-8088-710.1007/s10854-017-8088-7 ↗
35. 10.1186/s12951-018-0408-410.1186/s12951-018-0408-4 ↗
36. 10.18689/ijmr-100010310.18689/ijmr-1000103 ↗
37. 10.1515/gps-2020-003110.1515/gps-2020-0031 ↗
38. 10.1039/D0NA00984A10.1039/D0NA00984A ↗
39. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0050610.3389/fbioe.2020.00506 ↗
40. 10.3390/ijms1909279910.3390/ijms19092799 ↗
41. Behtash Ladan SA · New Cellular & Molecular Biology · 2012 · 2 · 83
42. HkeemIbrahem K · American Journal of PharmTech Research · 2014 · 4 · 397
43. Aldujaili NH · Periódico Tchê Química · 2020 · 17 · 31110.52571/PTQ.v17.n34.2020.328_P34_pgs_311_320.pdf ↗
44. 10.1016/j.btre.2014.11.00110.1016/j.btre.2014.11.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.02.01510.1016/j.bios.2015.02.015 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.01810.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.018 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.04.00410.1016/j.procbio.2015.04.004 ↗
48. 10.4014/jmb.1411.1102210.4014/jmb.1411.11022 ↗
49. Nangia Y · Microbial Cell Factories · 2009 · 8 · 110.1186/1475-2859-8-1 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12649-018-0540-210.1007/s12649-018-0540-2 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.014 ↗
52. 10.1166/jnn.2007.60010.1166/jnn.2007.600 ↗
53. Moshfegh M · Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures · 2011 · 6 · 1419
54. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.006210.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0062 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.04.00410.1016/j.jgeb.2018.04.004 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.00610.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.006 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.btre.2016.07.00110.1016/j.btre.2016.07.001 ↗
58. 10.1007/s40089-014-0133-410.1007/s40089-014-0133-4 ↗
59. 10.15835/nsb74964310.15835/nsb749643 ↗
60. Oves M · IET · 2016 · 11 · 403
61. 10.1021/nn900079e10.1021/nn900079e ↗
62. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.01.01410.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.01.014 ↗
63. 10.1039/c3ra44143a10.1039/c3ra44143a ↗
64. 10.1099/mic.0.036681-010.1099/mic.0.036681-0 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.btre.2014.12.00110.1016/j.btre.2014.12.001 ↗
66. Fierascu I · Farmacia · 2014 · 62 · 129
67. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.01910.1016/j.msec.2015.10.019 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jscs.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jscs.2014.06.005 ↗
69. 10.1186/2191-0855-3-3210.1186/2191-0855-3-32 ↗
70. 10.3390/nano907104210.3390/nano9071042 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.02.00610.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.02.006 ↗
72. 10.1155/2014/35931610.1155/2014/359316 ↗
73. 10.2174/221352940199914031010465510.2174/2213529401999140310104655 ↗
74. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.003210.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0032 ↗
75. 10.1007/s11274-013-1481-310.1007/s11274-013-1481-3 ↗
76. 10.3390/en1201019010.3390/en12010190 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.09810.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.098 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.001 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.02910.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.029 ↗
80. 10.2147/IJN.S15754110.2147/IJN.S157541 ↗
81. 10.2174/15734131079117118010.2174/157341310791171180 ↗
82. 10.1080/15533174.2013.87173310.1080/15533174.2013.871733 ↗
83. 10.30699/ijmm.15.4.36910.30699/ijmm.15.4.369 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.10976310.1016/j.lwt.2020.109763 ↗
85. Salama HH · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation · 2021 · 19 · article e15510
86. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.09.00310.1016/j.jtemb.2016.09.003 ↗
87. 10.3390/ijms2203098910.3390/ijms22030989 ↗
88. 10.1007/s41061-017-0176-x10.1007/s41061-017-0176-x ↗
89. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.08310.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.083 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.05910.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.059 ↗
91. 10.1002/iub.108410.1002/iub.1084 ↗
92. 10.1007/s10123-002-0091-y10.1007/s10123-002-0091-y ↗
93. 10.1016/S0723-2020(00)80058-210.1016/S0723-2020(00)80058-2 ↗
94. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42403-910.1016/S0021-9258(18)42403-9 ↗
95. 10.1021/bi00798a01310.1021/bi00798a013 ↗
96. 10.1007/s12274-014-0526-810.1007/s12274-014-0526-8 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.nano.2019.10211010.1016/j.nano.2019.102110 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.05610.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.056 ↗
99. 10.1007/978-3-319-95390-8_2110.1007/978-3-319-95390-8_21 ↗
100. 10.1039/D0NJ05884J10.1039/D0NJ05884J ↗