Comparative evaluation of personalized 3D-printed scaffold-driven double-barrel fibula flap for the reconstruction of segmented mandibular defects
Source abstract
Abstract
The challenge of reconstructing large mandibular bone defects with double-barrel fibula flap (DBFF) is limited by the availability of autogenous bone, which remains a significant issue in maxillofacial surgery. This study aims to compare the novel scaffold-driven double-barrel approach with the DBFF method, and investigate the biomechanical behavior of 3D-printed porous titanium scaffolds with varying design parameters. The mandibular reconstruction model underwent FEA in two surgery phases, under two experimental loads and two design parameters. The experimental scaffold design was categorized into 9 groups based on the porous diameters (DP = 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm) and strut diameters (DS = 0.4 mm,0.5 mm,0.6 mm). The results illustrated that the stress in fibula, cortical and trabecular bones for all groups were within the ranges of normal physiological levels. The porous scaffolds effectively transmit mechanical stimulation, resulting in bone graft materials achieving up to 99.9% strain, with low stiffness to avoid stress shielding. The study revealed that the design parameters of Group B and Group F were more conducive to meeting biomechanical demands and promoting bone regeneration. This study presents scientifically proven and effective clinical solution for restoring both function and aesthetics of mandibular defects, while also providing valuable insights for future design criteria in bone regeneration scaffolds.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Mandibular reconstruction: overview10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5 ↗
2. Rehabilitation post maxillary and mandibular reconstruction: current status and future approaches10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104663 ↗
3. Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review10.1016/j.ijom.2008.03.002 ↗
4. Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients10.1097/00006534-199910000-00011 ↗
5. Mandibular reconstruction using the double barrel fibular graft10.1002/micr.1920160704 ↗
6. Double-barrel vascularised fibula graft in mandibular reconstruction: a 10-year experience with an algorithm10.1016/j.bjps.2012.10.005 ↗
7. Comparative analysis of dental implant treatment outcomes following mandibular reconstruction with double-barrel fibula bone grafting or vertical distraction osteogenesis fibula: a retrospective study10.1111/clr.12300 ↗
8. Analysis of fibular single graft and fibular double-barrel graft for mandibular reconstruction10.1097/GOX.0000000000001018 ↗
9. Functional mandibular reconstruction with double-barrel fibular flap and primary osseointegrated dental implants improve facial esthetic outcome10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.008 ↗
10. Biomechanical analysis of various reconstructive methods for the mandibular body and ramus defect using a free vascularized fibula flap
11. Use of the “double barrel” free vascularized fibula in mandibular reconstruction10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90914-4 ↗
12. Double-barrel fibula vascularized free flap with dental rehabilitation for mandibular reconstruction10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.051 ↗
13. Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8828 ↗
14. Multi-scale surface treatments of titanium implants for rapid osseointegration: a review10.3390/nano10061244 ↗
15. 3D printing titanium grid scaffold facilitates osteogenesis in mandibular segmental defects10.1038/s41536-023-00308-0 ↗
16. Tooth eruption results from bone remodelling driven by bite forces sensed by soft tissue dental follicles: a finite element analysis10.1371/journal.pone.0058803 ↗
17. Which plate results in better stability after segmental mandibular resection and fibula free flap reconstruction? biomechanical analysis10.1016/j.oooo.2018.05.048 ↗
18. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants - a review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
19. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns on four occlusal convergent abutments in implant prosthesis10.3390/app9132585 ↗
20. Inter-species investigation of the mechano-regulation of bone healing: comparison of secondary bone healing in sheep and rat10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.074 ↗
21. A personalized 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint: from implant design to implantation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.048 ↗
22. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians
23. Reconstruction of large skeletal defects: current clinical therapeutic strategies and future directions using 3D printing10.3389/fbioe.2020.00061 ↗
24. The free vascularized bone graft. a clinical extension of microvascular techniques10.1097/00006534-197505000-00002 ↗
25. The evolution of free vascularized bone transfer: a 40-year experience10.1097/PRS.0000000000002040 ↗
26. The partial double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft: a solution for long mandibular defects10.1097/00006534-200004050-00057 ↗
27. 3D-printed PEEK implant for mandibular defects repair - a new method10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104335 ↗
28. Assembly of 3D-printed Ti scaffold and free vascularized fibula using a customized Ti plate for the reconstruction of mandibular defects10.1007/s42242-021-00181-0 ↗
29. An innovative additively manufactured implant for mandibular injuries: design and preparation processes based on simulation model10.3389/fbioe.2022.1065971 ↗
30. A novel conceptual design of a biomimetic oral implant and its biomechanical effect on the repairment of a large mandibular defect
31. Influence of the pore size and porosity of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V ELI porous scaffold on cell proliferation, osteogenesis and bone ingrowth10.1016/j.msec.2019.110289 ↗
32. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00086-6 ↗