journal article·2025-11Open access

Energy-based multiphase CFD framework integrating DPM and CIEM for predicting dynamic cell adhesion in porous scaffolds

Qinghua Tan, Ning Ji, Qiongchi Zhang, Bo Chen, Haoyu Wang, Bo Zhao, Dong Wang, Xijing He, Pengrong Ouyang

Materials & Design· Volume 259

Abstract

• The Energy-Based Multiphase computational fluid dynamic model accurately predicted the cell adhesion on porous scaffolds. • With matched morphology, the Diamond scaffold showed higher cell adhesion but limited distribution depth. • TPMS and Voronoi scaffolds showed lower cell adhesion but deeper and more uniform distribution. • Cell adhesion was influenced not only by architecture type but also by pore size, strut thickness, and porosity. The architecture of porous scaffolds significantly influences the adhesion of seeded cells, which determines the scaffold’s final performance. However, how scaffold structure affects this process remains poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to address this challenge from the perspective of the hydromechanical microenvironment. We employed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method to simulate dynamic cell seeding in porous scaffolds with varying structures, using the Discrete Phase Model (DPM) to model seeded cells. A novel Cell Impingement Energy Model (CIEM) was implemented to capture cell-scaffold interactions, where adhesion was determined by impingement energy. The simulation results were validated through in vitro dynamic seeding and in vivo animal experiments. The results showed that despite comparable morphological parameters, TPMS and Voronoi scaffolds presented lower overall cell adhesion but a more uniform spatial distribution, while Diamond scaffolds exhibited higher cell adhesion, primarily localized on the surface. Adjusting the morphological parameters can improve the uniformity of cell distribution in Diamond scaffold. More importantly, the computational and experimental results were highly consistent, suggesting that CFD combining DPM and CIEM can effectively simulate dynamic cell seeding. This study presents a reliable approach for predicting cell adhesion in porous scaffolds, offering valuable insights for scaffold design and optimization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Medical applications of Porous Biomaterials: Features of Porosity and Tissue-specific Implications for Biocompatibility10.1002/adhm.202102087 ↗
2. Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Function of Multi-Material Hierarchically Structured Scaffolds10.1002/adhm.202202766 ↗
3. Porous Scaffold Design for Additive Manufacturing in Orthopedics: a Review10.3389/fbioe.2020.00609 ↗
4. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
5. Bionic design and 3D printing of porous titanium alloy scaffolds for bone tissue repair10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.094 ↗
6. Development of lattice structure with selective laser melting process: a state of the art on properties, future trends and challenges10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.051 ↗
7. B. Liu, F. Jiawei, C. Jianbin, H. Yong, J. and Fu, A topology optimisation-based design method for 3D Voronoi porous structures and its application for medical pillows, Virtual and Physical Prototyping 18(1) (2023) e2285392.10.1080/17452759.2023.2285392 ↗
8. Enhancing mechanical properties of additively manufactured voronoi-based architected metamaterials via a lattice-inspired design strategy10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2024.104199 ↗
9. A topology strategy to reduce stress shielding of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106331 ↗
10. Effect of scaffold architecture on cell seeding efficiency: a discrete phase model CFD analysis10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.025 ↗
11. A review of computational optimization of bone scaffold architecture: methods, challenges, and perspectives
12. Hydromechanical mechanism behind the effect of pore size of porous titanium scaffolds on osteoblast response and bone ingrowth10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108151 ↗
13. Experimental measurements and CFD modelling of hydroxyapatite scaffolds in perfusion bioreactors for bone regeneration
14. A validated finite element analysis procedure for porous structures10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108546 ↗
15. An agent-based model for cell microenvironment simulation using FLAMEGPU210.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108831 ↗
16. A machine learning-based multiscale model to predict bone formation in scaffolds10.1038/s43588-021-00115-x ↗
17. µ-Particle tracking velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics study of cell seeding within a 3D porous scaffold10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.003 ↗
18. Flow perfusion rate modulates cell deposition onto scaffold substrate during cell seeding10.1007/s10237-017-0985-4 ↗
19. Simulation of cell seeding within a three-dimensional porous scaffold: a fluid-particle analysis10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0660 ↗
20. Irregular pore size of degradable bioceramic Voronoi scaffolds prepared by stereolithography: Osteogenesis and computational fluid dynamics analysis10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111414 ↗
21. Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering10.1007/s10237-009-0153-6 ↗
22. Effect of fluid flow on smooth muscle cells in a 3-dimensional collagen gel model10.1161/01.ATV.20.10.2220 ↗
23. An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems10.1017/S0022112072001806 ↗
24. The influence of the scaffold design on the distribution of adhering cells after perfusion cell seeding10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.023 ↗
25. Numerical Study of Granular Scaffold Efficiency to Convert Fluid Flow into Mechanical Stimulation in Bone Tissue Engineering10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0648 ↗
26. Cell Seeding Process Experiment and simulation on Three-Dimensional Polyhedron and Cross-link Design Scaffolds10.3389/fbioe.2020.00104 ↗
27. Biomimetic structural design in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
28. A CFD model-based design of seeding processes for two-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell cultivation10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108157 ↗
29. Mapping cell surface adhesion by rotation tracking and adhesion footprinting10.1038/srep44502 ↗
30. Cell adhesion by integrins10.1152/physrev.00036.2018 ↗
31. Forces and bond dynamics in cell adhesion10.1126/science.1137592 ↗
32. Perfusion bioreactor system for human mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering: dynamic cell seeding and construct development10.1002/bit.20532 ↗
33. Dynamic seeding versus microinjection of mesenchymal stem cells for acellular nerve allograft: an in vitro comparison10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.017 ↗
34. Industrialization of a perfusion bioreactor: Prime example of a non-straightforward process10.1002/term.2480 ↗
35. Influence of structural parameters of 3D-printed triply periodic minimal surface gyroid porous scaffolds on compression performance, cell response, and bone regeneration10.1002/jbm.b.35337 ↗
36. Multiple channels with interconnected pores in a bioceramic scaffold promote bone tissue formation10.1038/s41598-021-00024-z ↗
37. Design of a Haversian system-like gradient porous scaffold based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for promoting bone regeneration10.1016/j.jare.2023.01.004 ↗
38. The Design and In Vivo Testing of a locally Stiffness-Matched Porous Scaffold10.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.017 ↗
39. Metals for bone implants: Safety, design, and efficacy10.1007/s40898-016-0001-2 ↗
40. A review of graded scaffolds made by additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: design, fabrication and properties10.1088/1758-5090/adba8e ↗
41. Functionally graded hydrogels with opposing biochemical cues for osteochondral tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ad467e ↗
42. Gradients in pore size enhance the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in three-dimensional scaffolds10.1038/srep22898 ↗
43. 3D printed pore morphology mediates bone marrow stem cell behaviors via RhoA/ROCK2 signaling pathway for accelerating bone regeneration
44. Integrated evaluation of biomechanical and biological properties of the biomimetic structural bone scaffold: Biomechanics, simulation analysis, and osteogenesis
45. Determination of an initial stage of the Bone Tissue Ingrowth into Titanium Matrix by Cell Adhesion Model, Front Bioeng