journal article·2025-06Open access

Directed energy deposition of functionally graded V-4Cr-4Ti to Fe-9Cr transition for fusion power systems

D. Ebeperi, T. Graening, Y. Yang, A. Whitt, R. Seede, K.C. Atli, Y. Katoh, R. Arroyave, I. Karaman

Materials & Design· Volume 254

Abstract

• • Demonstrated additive manufacturability of three unique alloys for the first time. • • Developed a processing roadmap for near defect-free multi-material fabrication. • • A multilayer VCrTi-Gr91 graded part was printed for fusion divertor components. • • Minor cracking at FeCrAl-VCrAl interface was linked to an FeV intermetallic formation. • • Discrete Cr buffer layer integration to mitigate intermetallic formation is proposed. This study proposes a graded structure via additive manufacturing for divertor and first wall blanket applications in fusion reactors. Materials were selected based on thermodynamic calculations to operate from 1100 °C at the plasma-facing level to 550 °C at the structural steel level. Conventional joining methods often lead to failures due to discrete reaction layers with significant mechanical property differences. Using laser beam-directed energy deposition (LB-DED), this study demonstrates the fabrication of a VCrTi-Gr91 steel functionally graded component through a novel process parameter optimization framework. A systematic approach included powder characterization, single-track depositions, and construction of printability maps. Near full-density specimens of each interlayer were additively manufactured, and a transition from V-based alloys to reduced activation ferritic martensitic steels was achieved. Computational material selection of interlayer alloys and thermodynamic/diffusion kinetics simulations prevented most interface incompatibilities. A brittle intermetallic formed at one interface, causing cracking, which was not predicted by current thermodynamic models. Transition alloy design approach was updated with a more recent database and a mitigation strategy has been proposed to eliminate the formation of deleterious intermetallic phases. Ultimately, LB-DED has proven effective for producing multi-material graded systems for fusion applications, with the demonstrated process parameter optimization framework applicable to various materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Global development and readiness of nuclear fusion technology as the alternative source for clean energy supply10.3390/su16104089 ↗
2. E. Peluso, E. Pakhomova, M. Gelfusa, New Challenges in Nuclear Fusion Reactors: From Data Analysis to Materials and Manufacturing, 2023, MDPI. p. 6240.10.3390/app13106240 ↗
3. D. Cohen-Tanugi, M.G. Stapelberg, M.P. Short, S.E. Ferry, D.G. Whyte, Z.S. Hartwig, T. Buonassisi, Materials for Fusion Energy: Key Challenges and Guiding Principles for Developing Under High Design Uncertainty. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12187, 2023.
4. Focus on plasma-facing materials in nuclear fusion reactors10.1088/2053-1591/ad36b5 ↗
5. Progress and challenges of additive manufacturing of tungsten and alloys as plasma-facing materials10.3390/ma17092104 ↗
6. Status of He-cooled divertor development for DEMO10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.159 ↗
7. ITER: the first experimental fusion reactor10.1016/0920-3796(94)00339-9 ↗
8. Optimizing the overall configuration of a He-cooled W-alloy divertor for a power plant10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.12.069 ↗
9. Recent US activities on advanced He-cooled W-alloy divertor concepts for fusion power plants10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.08.015 ↗
10. Development of a helium-cooled divertor concept: design-related requirements on materials and fabrication technology10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.137 ↗
11. ARIES-ACT1 system configuration, assembly, and maintenance10.13182/FST14-797 ↗
12. Design and performance study of the helium-cooled T-tube divertor concept10.1016/j.fusengdes.2006.11.004 ↗
13. Evaluation of Tungsten—Steel Solid-State Bonding: Options and the Role of CALPHAD to Screen Diffusion Bonding Interlayers10.3390/met13081438 ↗
14. Microstructure and tensile strength of the bonded interfaces and parent materials in W/ODS steel joints fabricated by direct SSDB10.1007/s11661-021-06335-0 ↗
15. Investigation on the diffusion bonding of tungsten and EUROFER9710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.121 ↗
16. Joining technologies of reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steel for blanket fabrication10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.07.015 ↗
17. On the use of CoCrFeNi high entropy alloy as a new interlayer for achieving high strength diffusion bonded tungsten/steel joint
18. Microstructure, properties, and formation mechanisms of tungsten/steel hot isostatic pressing diffusion bonding joint utilizing a Ni-Si-B interlayer10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117303 ↗
19. Effect of bonding process on the microstructures and strength of W/steel joints with a W-Cu-Ni interlayer10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105846 ↗
20. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of tungsten alloy/steel diffusion bonding joint using CrFeCoNiCu high entropy alloy interlayer10.1016/j.matchar.2023.112837 ↗
21. Interfacial microstructures of HIP joined W and ferritic–martensitic steel with Ti interlayers10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.049 ↗
22. Investigation of tungsten/EUROFER97 diffusion bonding using Nb interlayer10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.03.017 ↗
23. Effect of holding time on the microstructure and strength of tungsten/ferritic steel joints diffusion bonded with a nickel interlayer10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.043 ↗
24. Microstructure and strength of diffusion bonding W alloy/304 stainless steel joint using a Cu interlayer10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106188 ↗
25. Exploring FAST Technique for Diffusion Bonding of Tungsten to EUROFERE97 in DEMO First Wall10.3390/ma17112624 ↗
26. Overview of challenges and developments in joining tungsten and steel for future fusion reactors
27. Microstructures of brazed and solid-state diffusion bonded joints of tungsten with oxide dispersion strengthened steel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.004 ↗
28. Improvements in W-Eurofer first wall brazed joint using alloyed powders fillers10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.03.126 ↗
29. Joining of tungsten with low-activation ferritic–martensitic steel and vanadium alloys for demo reactor10.1016/j.nme.2018.03.010 ↗
30. Overview of processing technologies for tungsten-steel composites and FGMs for fusion applications10.1515/nuka-2015-0049 ↗
31. Structural materials for fission & fusion energy10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70294-9 ↗
32. Phase transformations in alloys of the Fe–V system10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.02.030 ↗
33. Laser-welded butt joints of Ti2AlNb/42CrMo steel with addition of V interlayer10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.12.272 ↗
34. Study on electron beam weld joints between pure vanadium and SUS316L stainless steel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.300 ↗
35. Friction welding of dissimilar metal joints with intermediate layers
36. Properties of explosion welding titanium‐steel joints with a vanadium interlayer10.1080/09507110109549450 ↗
37. Influence of vanadium filler on the properties of titanium and steel TIG welded joints10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.018 ↗
38. A novel design of transitional layer structure between reduced activation ferritic martensitic steels and tungsten for plasma facing materials10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.019 ↗
39. Powder bed fusion vs. directed energy deposition benchmark study: Mid-size part with simple geometry
40. Functionally Graded Materials through robotics-inspired path planning10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107975 ↗
41. Characterization of a functionally graded material of Ti-6Al-4V to 304L stainless steel with an intermediate V section10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.156 ↗
42. A review of the anomalies in directed energy deposition (DED) processes & potential solutions-Part quality & defects10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.038 ↗
43. Directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing: physical characteristics, defects, challenges and applications10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.020 ↗
44. State of the Art in Directed Energy Deposition: From Additive Manufacturing to Materials Design10.3390/coatings9070418 ↗
45. Critical review of the state of the art in multi-material fabrication via directed energy deposition10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100924 ↗
46. Fabrication and characterization of a functionally graded material from Ti-6Al-4V to SS316 by laser metal deposition
47. Development and characterization of Ti-6Al-4V to 304L stainless steel gradient components fabricated with laser deposition additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.016 ↗
48. Ohtani, H., The CALPHAD method. Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods, 2006, p. 1001.10.1007/978-3-540-30300-8_20 ↗
49. H. Czichos, T. Saito, L. Smith, Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods, 2006.10.1007/978-3-540-30300-8 ↗
50. The Calphad method and its role in material and process development10.4322/2176-1523.1059 ↗
51. PANDAT software with PanEngine, PanOptimizer and PanPrecipitation for multi-component phase diagram calculation and materials property simulation10.1016/j.calphad.2008.08.004 ↗
52. Thermodynamic modeling and kinetics simulation of precipitate phases in AISI 316 stainless steels10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.02.008 ↗
53. Thermo-Calc & DICTRA, computational tools for materials science10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 ↗
54. TCHEA1: a thermodynamic database not limited for “high entropy” alloys10.1007/s11669-017-0570-7 ↗
55. Martienssen · 2006
56. Neumann · 2011
57. Roles of vacancy/interstitial diffusion and segregation in the microchemistry at grain boundaries of irradiated Fe–Cr–Ni alloys10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.02.007 ↗
58. Development of a process optimization framework for fabricating fully dense advanced high strength steels using laser directed energy deposition
59. A process optimization framework for laser direct energy deposition: Densification, microstructure, and mechanical properties of an FeCr alloy10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.028 ↗
60. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
61. An ultra-high strength martensitic steel fabricated using selective laser melting additive manufacturing: Densification, microstructure, and mechanical properties10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.037 ↗
62. Laser metal deposition of copper on diverse metals using green laser sources10.1007/s00170-020-05117-z ↗
63. Scattered data interpolation with multilevel B-splines10.1109/2945.620490 ↗
64. An empirical-statistical model for laser cladding of WC-12Co powder on AISI 321 stainless steel10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.06.026 ↗
65. Direct energy deposition-laser additive manufacturing of titanium-molybdenum alloy: Parametric studies, microstructure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.121 ↗
66. A framework to link localized cooling and properties of directed energy deposition (DED)-processed Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.027 ↗
67. Thermal effect on clad dimension for laser deposited Inconel 71810.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.024 ↗
68. Process optimization for directed energy deposition of SS316L components10.1007/s00170-020-06113-z ↗
69. In-line height measurement technique for directed energy deposition processes
70. Height control of laser metal-wire deposition based on iterative learning control and 3D scanning10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.03.016 ↗
71. Height consistency compensation in laser-directed energy deposition of thin-walled parts10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.108963 ↗
72. Heat accumulation in laser Additive Manufacturing processes and its effect on local solidification10.1016/j.procir.2022.08.144 ↗
73. Infrared thermographic imaging based real-time layer height estimation during directed energy deposition10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107661 ↗
74. Thermodynamic modeling of Al–Fe–V ternary system10.1088/2053-1591/ab55a6 ↗