journal article·2025-10Open access

Experimental and numerical analyses of creep behaviour of composite bonded joints under mode I and mode II loading

R.F.M. Couto, M.F.S.F. de Moura, A.G. Magalhães, R.D.F. Moreira

Materials & Design· Volume 258

Abstract

• Creep behaviour under pure mode I and II loading of bonded joints was addressed. • New Cohesive Zone Model for Creep behaviour of composite bonded joints. • The Kachanov-Rabotnov-Voigt-Kelvin-Sun model is better for mode I. • The Liu-Murakami-Voigt-Kelvin-Hyperbolic is better for mode II. The creep behaviour of composite bonded joints under pure mode I and pure mode II loading was analysed in this work. Experimental tests were carried out on the Double Cantilever Beam and the End Notched Flexure under different load levels and the corresponding experimental curves of compliance versus time were recorded for data-processing schemes. The Kachanov-Rabotnov-Voigt-Kelvin-Sun (KRVKS) and Liu-Murakami-Voigt-Kelvin-Hyperbolic (LMVKH) creep laws were implemented in a cohesive zone model suitable for creep analysis and the resulting numerical curves of compliance versus time were compared with the experimental data. The advantages and disadvantages of each model in representing the creep behaviour are analysed and discussed. It was concluded that the KRVKS model is better for representing mode I creep behaviour, while the LMVKH is more suitable for mode II creep behaviour.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Multiscale experimental characterisation of mode-I interfacial fracture behaviour of vitrimer composites10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112229 ↗
2. Joining of additively manufactured fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and metals by ultrasonic energy: mechanical and corrosion behavior10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112342 ↗
3. A.A. Baker, L.R.F. Rose, R. Jones, Advances in the bonded composite repair of metallic aircraft structure, in: Advances in the bonded composite repair of metallic aircraft structure, A. A. Baker, L. R. F. Rose, R. Jones (Eds.), Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2002, pp. vii–viii. doi: 10.1016/B978-008042699-0/50001-2.10.1016/B978-008042699-0/50001-2 ↗
4. Coupled cohesive zone models for mixed-mode fracture: a comparative study10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.09.029 ↗
5. W. Zhang, J. Lin, Y. Huang, B. Lin, X. Liu, State of the Art Regarding Interface Bond Behavior Between FRP and Concrete Based on Cohesive Zone Model, 2025, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108528.10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108528 ↗
6. Methods for the prediction of fatigue delamination growth in composites and adhesive bonds - a critical review10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.003 ↗
7. Predicting fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
8. A customized shear traction separation law for cohesive zone modelling of creep loaded ENF adhesive joints10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103336 ↗
9. Creep damage laws for bonded joints under pure mode I loading10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104346 ↗
10. Creep damage laws for bonded joints under pure mode II loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103879 ↗
11. A theoretical and computational framework for studying creep crack growth10.1007/s10704-017-0230-2 ↗
12. A theoretical and computational investigation of mixed mode creep crack growth along an interface10.1007/s10704-021-00534-x ↗
13. Findley · 1976
14. A damage-based cohesive zone model of intergranular crack growth in a nickel-based superalloy10.1177/1056789512468917 ↗
15. Effect of creep on the mode II residual fracture energy of adhesives10.1002/app.51387 ↗
16. Mixed-mode I+II fracture characterisation of composite bonded joints10.1080/01694243.2019.1708645 ↗
17. A three-dimensional finite element model for stress analysis of adhesive joints10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00015-5 ↗
18. Comparative analysis of the sin-hyperbolic and Kachanov–Rabotnov creep-damage models10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.02.001 ↗
19. Computational methods for creep fracture analysis by damage mechanics10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00209-1 ↗
20. C. Stewart, A Hybrid Constitutive Model for Creep, Fatigue, and Creep-fatigue Damage, 2013.
21. Low-stress creep deformation in two opto-electronic glass-epoxy joints: Part I – adhesive creep data10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.026 ↗