Reshaping anisotropic behavior in metallic sheets under complex stress states: Symmetric and asymmetric polynomial models with advanced convexity analysis approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Fourth-order polynomial-related analytical symmetric and asymmetric anisotropic yield criteria under the non-associated flow rule, are proposed to cover a wider range of stress states. The new model can be directly calibrated using selected experimental data. Additionally, a modified geometry-inspired numerical convexity proof method is developed to demonstrate that the proposed model satisfies the convexity condition. Compared the newly proposed and existing advanced convexity proof methods and yield criteria, and evaluated the applicability and effectiveness of the new framework. The results indicate that the new convexity proof method provides highly accurate convexity identification, consistent with the Hessian matrix method, while maintaining the user-friendliness of the GINCA method. The new symmetric model exhibits the highest accuracy in characterizing the plastic anisotropy of DP490 and AA6016-T4 compared to other investigated yield criteria. Furthermore, the new asymmetric model effectively predicts the strength differential effect under complex stress states. Precise modeling of near-plane strain and pure shear stress states significantly enhances the characterization of stress states in tensile-tensile and tension–compression regions. Applying the anisotropic hardening concept enables continuous capture of the subsequent yielding behavior of metallic sheets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. The anomalous negative electric current sensitivity of a precipitation hardened Al alloy during electrically-assisted forming10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.161 ↗
2. Non-associated and non-quadratic characteristics in plastic anisotropy of automotive lightweight sheet metals, Automot
3. Advanced lightweight materials for automobiles: a review10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110994 ↗
4. Lode-dependent anisotropic-asymmetric yield function for isotropic and anisotropic hardening of pressure-insensitive materials. Part I: quadratic function under non-associated flow rule10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103647 ↗
5. Asymmetric yield function based on the stress invariants for pressure sensitive metals10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.008 ↗
6. A flexible yield criterion for strength modeling from biaxial compression to biaxial tension10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104113 ↗
7. Influences of the evolving plastic behavior of sheet metal on V-bending and springback analysis considering different stress states10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.103889 ↗
8. T. Kuwabara, Biaxial stress testing methods for sheet metals, in: Comprehensive Materials Processing, Elsevier, 2014: pp. 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00106-0.10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00106-0 ↗
9. New method for stress determination based on digital image correlation data10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.026 ↗
10. A theory of plastic anisotropy based on a yield function of fourth order (plane stress state)—I10.1016/0020-7403(77)90043-1 ↗
11. Description of anisotropic behaviour of AA3103-0 aluminium alloy using two recent yield criteria
12. An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.003 ↗
13. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
14. Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
15. New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.12.007 ↗
16. Application of the theory of representation to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminum alloys10.1016/S0020-7225(03)00037-5 ↗
17. New yield criteria for isotropic and textured metallic materials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.036 ↗
18. A general yield function with differential and anisotropic hardening for strength modelling under various stress states with non-associated flow rule10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103414 ↗
19. A plane stress yield function for anisotropic sheet material by interpolation of biaxial stress states10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.009 ↗
20. An interpolation-type orthotropic yield function and its application under biaxial tension10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.05.008 ↗
21. A yield criterion through coupling of quadratic and non-quadratic functions for anisotropic hardening with non-associated flow rule10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.08.007 ↗
22. A coupled yield criterion for anisotropic hardening with analytical description under associated flow rule: modeling and validation10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102882 ↗
23. Anisotropic plastic deformation of extruded aluminum alloy tube under axial forces and internal pressure10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.006 ↗
24. Experimental and numerical study on the deformation mechanism of straight flanging by incremental sheet forming10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.024 ↗
25. The inverse parameter identification of hill 48 yield criterion and its verification in press bending and roll forming process simulations10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.09.009 ↗
26. Springback control and large skin manufacturing by high-speed vibration using electromagnetic forming10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117340 ↗
27. Hole-expansion: sensitivity of failure prediction on plastic anisotropy modeling
28. Modeling of localization and fracture phenomena in strain and stress space for sheet metal forming10.1007/s12289-015-1242-y ↗
29. A forming limit framework accounting for various failure mechanisms: localization, ductile and cleavage fracture10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.103921 ↗
30. On the experimental characterization of sheet metal formability and the consistent calibration of the MK model for biaxial stretching in plane stress10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116887 ↗
31. A new anisotropic-asymmetric yield criterion covering wider stress states in sheet metal forming10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103653 ↗
32. Earing in cup-drawing of anisotropic al-6022-T4 sheets10.1007/s12289-016-1282-y ↗
33. Yield locus evolution and constitutive parameter identification using plane strain tension and tensile tests10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.018 ↗
34. Effect of different yield criteria and material parameter identification methods on the description accuracy of the anisotropic behavior of 5182-O aluminum alloy10.1007/s11665-021-06295-x ↗
35. Towards improved description of plastic anisotropy in sheet metals under biaxial loading: a novel generalization of Hill48 yield criterion
36. Application of laser deposition to mechanical characterization of advanced high strength steels subject to non-proportional loading10.1007/s11340-022-00820-2 ↗
37. Multiaxial tube expansion test method for measurement of sheet metal deformation behavior under biaxial tension for a large strain range10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.12.003 ↗
38. Improvement of numerical modelling considering plane strain material characterization with an elliptic hydraulic bulge test10.3390/jmmp2010006 ↗
39. On anisotropic plasticity models using linear transformations on the deviatoric stress: physical constraints on plastic flow in generalized plane strain
40. Numerical modeling for accurate prediction of strain localization in hole expansion of a steel sheet10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.005 ↗
41. Effects of biaxial tensile mechanical properties and non-integer exponent on description accuracy of anisotropic yield behavior10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110210 ↗
42. Analytical determination of anisotropic parameters for Poly6 yield function10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106467 ↗
43. Plastic anisotropy of sheet metals under plane strain loading: a novel non-associated constitutive model based on fourth-order polynomial functions10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111187 ↗
44. Chen · 2022
45. Modeling of Eyld2000-2d anisotropic yield criterion considering strength differential effect and analysis of optimal calibration strategy10.3390/ma16196445 ↗
46. Experimental validation of non-associated flow rule and hydraulic bulge forming simulation for a 6000 series aluminum alloy sheet10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113218 ↗
47. Analytically described polynomial yield criterion by considering both plane strain and pure shear states10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103514 ↗
48. Large strain flow curve characterization considering strain rate and thermal effect for 5182-O aluminum alloy10.1007/s12289-022-01721-4 ↗
49. Simple shear methodology for local structure–property relationships of sheet metals: State-of-the-art and open issues10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101266 ↗
50. M. Panchal, L. Kaushik, R. KR, R. Khatirkar, S.-H. Choi, J. Singh, Recent advances in the in-plane shear testing of Mg alloy sheets, J. Magnesium Alloys 11 (2023) 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2023.02.006.10.1016/j.jma.2023.02.006 ↗
51. An experimental and numerical investigation of different shear test configurations for sheet metal characterization10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.006 ↗
52. Material characterization for plane and curved sheets using the in-plane torsion test – an overview10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.030 ↗
53. A new shear test for sheet metal characterization10.1002/srin.201000163 ↗
54. Evaluation and calibration of anisotropic yield criteria in shear loading: Constraints to eliminate numerical artefacts10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.029 ↗
55. Modeling stress anisotropy, strength differential, and anisotropic hardening by coupling quadratic and stress-invariant-based yield functions under non-associated flow rule10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104458 ↗
56. Strength modeling of sheet metals from shear to plane strain tension10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102813 ↗
57. An anisotropic constitutive model for forming of aluminum tubes under both biaxial tension and pure shear stress states10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103259 ↗
58. Evolution of yield behavior for AA6016-T4 and DP490—towards a systematic evaluation strategy for material models10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103302 ↗
59. A generalized, computationally versatile plasticity model framework - part II: theory and verification focusing on shear anisotropy10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104158 ↗
60. A new coupled yield criterion focusing on the precise description of anisotropic behavior under broader stress states: modeling, validation, and convexity analysis10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113251 ↗
61. Breaking through the plasticity modeling limit in plane strain and shear loadings of sheet metals by a novel additive-coupled analytical yield criterion10.1016/j.jmst.2024.12.003 ↗
62. Investigation of evolving yield surfaces of dual-phase steels10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116314 ↗
63. Role of particles and lattice rotation in tension–compression asymmetry of aluminium alloys10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103464 ↗
64. Analytical model to characterize temperature-dependent anisotropic-asymmetric behavior of mg-gd-Y alloy10.1016/j.jma.2024.11.035 ↗
65. Deformation induced anisotropic responses of ti–6Al–4V alloy. Part I: experiments10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.03.015 ↗
66. A new methodology for anisotropic yield surface description using model order reduction techniques and invariant neural network10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105542 ↗
67. Tension/compression hardening behaviors of auto-body steel sheets at intermediate strain rates10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.035 ↗
68. Evolving asymmetric and anisotropic hardening of CP-ti sheets under monotonic and reverse loading: characterization and modeling10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103445 ↗
69. Consideration of strength differential effect in sheet metals with symmetric yield functions10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.11.010 ↗
70. A criterion for description of anisotropy and yield differential effects in pressure-insensitive metals10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.021 ↗
71. A normalized stress invariant-based yield criterion: modeling and validation10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.010 ↗
72. Orthotropic yield criteria for description of the anisotropy in tension and compression of sheet metals10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.013 ↗
73. Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.06.001 ↗
74. A criterion for general description of anisotropic hardening considering strength differential effect with non-associated flow rule10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.04.015 ↗
75. A concise analytical framework for describing asymmetric yield behavior based on the concept of shape functions10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103593 ↗
76. A generalized, computationally versatile plasticity model framework - part I: theory and verification focusing on tension–compression asymmetry10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103818 ↗
77. On the use of homogeneous polynomials to develop anisotropic yield functions with applications to sheet forming10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.016 ↗
78. A non-quadratic constitutive model under non-associated flow rule of sheet metals with anisotropic hardening: modeling and experimental validation10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.027 ↗
79. Analytical description of an asymmetric yield function (Yoon2014) by considering anisotropic hardening under non-associated flow rule10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102978 ↗
80. Convex polynomial yield functions10.1016/j.jmps.2010.08.005 ↗
81. A convex fourth order yield function for orthotropic metal plasticity10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104196 ↗
82. An improved method of determining gotoh’s nine material constants for a sheet metal with only seven or less experimental inputs10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.018 ↗
83. On the modelling of plastic anisotropy, asymmetry and directional hardening of commercially pure titanium: a planar fourier series based approach10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.02.010 ↗
84. New geometry-inspired numerical convex analysis method for yield functions under isotropic and anisotropic hardenings
85. A non-quadratic pressure-sensitive constitutive model under non-associated flow rule with anisotropic hardening: modeling and validation10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102808 ↗
86. Anisotropic constitutive modeling with the considerations of two strategies in describing the distorted hardening of AA6061 under tension-dominated loading conditions10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.130 ↗
87. The equivalent plastic strain-dependent Yld2000-2d yield function and the experimental verification10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.008 ↗
88. A parameter identification scheme for the orthotropic Poly6 yield function satisfying the convexity condition10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104467 ↗
89. Characterization of the asymmetric evolving yield and flow of 6016-T4 aluminum alloy and DP490 steel10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.040 ↗