journal article·2021-11Open access

Exploration of the influence of different biomimetic designs of 3D printed multi-material artificial spinal disc on the natural mechanics restoration

Zhiyang Yu, Benjamin Voumard, Kristina Shea, Tino Stanković

Materials & Design· Volume 210

Abstract

One of the great challenges of artificial spinal disc (ASD) design lies in the reproduction of the complex mechanics of an intervertebral disc (IVD) that is characterized by a viscoelastic, nonlinear, and anisotropic behavior. Although the development of multi-material additive manufacturing (AM) combined with biomimetic design provide new opportunities for the realization of ASDs with complex behavior, the influence of different biomimetic designs on the kinematics of ASD in conjunction with AM is not yet explored. Therefore, this study proposes and fabricates four types of biomimetic, multi-material ASD designs based on mimicking either the material stiffness gradient or the structure found in a natural IVD. The results show that all the designs exhibit a desired viscoelastic behavior, while the ASD design based on a chainmail-like structure exhibits a nature-mimicking nonlinear rotational load response. In terms of restoring the natural trend of an IVD’s anisotropic behavior, the ASD design that mimics the structure found in an IVD outperforms the design that solely mimics an IVD’s material stiffness gradient. Additionally, all the designs proposed in this study show comparable instant helical axis (IHA) and instant center of rotation (ICOR) to an IVD's regarding their location and moving direction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Q.-B.B. Bao, G.M. McCullen, P.A. Higham, J.H. Dumbleton, H.A. Yuan, The artificial disc: theory, design and materials., Biomaterials. 17 (1996) 1157–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)84936-2.10.1016/0142-9612(96)84936-2 ↗
2. Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation10.1007/s00586-009-1211-6 ↗
3. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.004 ↗
4. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc10.1097/00024720-200308000-00009 ↗
5. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.039 ↗
6. Y.A. Othman, R. Verma, S.A. Qureshi, Artificial disc replacement in spine surgery, Ann. Transl. Med. 7 (2019) S170–S170. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.08.26.10.21037/atm.2019.08.26 ↗
7. Effect of a novel compressible artificial disk on biomechanical performance of cervical spine: A finite element study10.1177/1687814015602597 ↗
8. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.015 ↗
9. The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy - A randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.039 ↗
10. Materials and design concepts for an intervertebral disc spacer. I. fiber-reinforced composite design10.1002/jab.770050205 ↗
11. Response of Charite total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns10.1016/j.spinee.2005.06.015 ↗
12. A. Landi, Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?, World J. Clin. Cases. 1 (2013) 134. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v1.i4.134.10.12998/wjcc.v1.i4.134 ↗
13. Viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement devices: Design concepts10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.007 ↗
14. The innovative viscoelastic CP ESP cervical disk prosthesis with six degrees of freedom: biomechanical concepts, development program and preliminary clinical experience10.1007/s00590-015-1695-1 ↗
15. Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up10.1016/j.esas.2009.12.002 ↗
16. Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs10.1002/jsp2.1040 ↗
17. Design of next generation total disk replacements10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.09.017 ↗
18. P.R. van den Broek, J.M. Huyghe, K. Ito, Biomechanical behavior of a biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc., Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 37 (2012) E367-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326305.10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326305 ↗
19. A computational method for the design of an additively manufactured personalized artificial spinal disc with physiological stiffness under multiple loading conditions10.1115/1.4043931 ↗
20. Biomimetic armour design strategies for additive manufacturing: a review10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109730 ↗
21. A biomimetic artificial disc with improved mechanical properties compared to biological interverteral discs10.1002/adfm.200305038 ↗
22. A multi-component fiber-reinforced PHEMA-based hydrogel/HAPEXTM device for customized intervertebral disc prosthesis10.1177/0885328209360933 ↗
23. C. Schätz, K. Ritter-Lang, L. Gössel, N. Dreßler, Comparison of single-level and multiple-level outcomes of total disc arthroplasty: 24-month results, Int. J. Spine Surg. 9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14444/2014.10.14444/2014 ↗
24. Hinges for origami-inspired structures by multimaterial additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108643 ↗
25. Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty10.1007/s00586-008-0780-0 ↗
26. Anisotropy characteristics of microstructures for bone substitutes and porous implants with application of additive manufacturing in orthopaedic10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108608 ↗
27. Finite element modelling and characterization of 3D cellular microstructures for the design of a cementless biomimetic porous hip stem10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.002 ↗
28. Buckling, build orientation, and scaling effects in 3D printed lattices10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.08.013 ↗
29. 3D-printed ceramic triply periodic minimal surface structures for design of functionally graded bone implants10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108602 ↗
30. Micromechanics of the Intervertebral Disk10.1016/B978-1-78548-208-3.50011-3 ↗
31. Modulation of extracellular matrix by annulus fibrosus cells on tailored silk based angle-ply intervertebral disc construct10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.015 ↗
32. Moderately degenerated human intervertebral disks exhibit a less geometrically specific collagen fiber orientation distribution10.1055/s-0035-1564805 ↗
33. Integrating MRI-based geometry, composition and fiber architecture in a finite element model of the human intervertebral disc10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.005 ↗
34. Testing criteria for spinal implants: Recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants10.1007/s005860050045 ↗
35. Altered helical axis patterns of the lumbar spine indicate increased instability with disc degeneration10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.010 ↗
36. W. Anderst, E. Baillargeon, W. Donaldson, J. Lee, J. Kang, Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: Implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis, Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ca5c7.10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ca5c7 ↗
37. Threshold cervical range-of-motion necessary to detect abnormal intervertebral motion in cervical spine radiographs, Spine (Phila
38. N. Subramanian, C.A. Reitman, L. Nguyen, J.A. Hipp, Radiographic assessment and quantitative motion analysis of the cervical spine after serial sectioning of the anterior ligamentous structures, Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 32 (2007) 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000256449.95667.13.10.1097/01.brs.0000256449.95667.13 ↗
39. Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability10.1097/00003086-198607000-00009 ↗
40. The instant axis of rotation influences facet forces at L5/S1 during flexion/extension and lateral bending10.1007/s00586-005-0935-1 ↗
41. Mechanical properties of parts fabricated with inkjet 3D printing through efficient experimental design10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.129 ↗
42. Dataset of angular and compressive responses of biomimetic artificial spinal discs fabricated using multi-material additive manufacturing10.1016/j.dib.2021.107527 ↗
43. Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.007 ↗
44. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.010 ↗
45. Material properties of human lumbar intervertebral discs across strain rates10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.012 ↗
46. A comparison of the shock-absorbing properties of cervical disc prosthesis bearing materials
47. Compliant Mechanism as a Motion-Preserving Artificial Spinal Disc: A Novel Concept10.1115/1.4045609 ↗
48. The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4–5 segment10.1007/s00586-009-1146-y ↗
49. PolyJet 3D Printing of Composite Materials: Experimental and Modelling Approach10.1007/s11837-020-04014-w ↗
50. K. Thakare, X. Wei, Z. Pei, Dimensional accuracy in polyjet printing: A literature review, ASME 2019 14th Int. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Conf. MSEC 2019. 1 (2019) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2019-3018.10.1115/MSEC2019-3018 ↗
51. Assessment of the dimensional and geometric precision of micro-details produced by material jetting10.3390/ma14081989 ↗
52. A database of lumbar spinal mechanical behavior for validation of spinal analytical models10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.035 ↗
53. Biomechanical characterization of an annulus-sparing spinal disc prosthesis10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.026 ↗
54. B.P. Beaubien, A. Derincek, W.D. Lew, K.B. Wood, In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws, Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 30 (2005) 1846–1851. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000174275.95104.12.10.1097/01.brs.0000174275.95104.12 ↗
55. Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty10.1007/s00586-019-06064-4 ↗
56. Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00199-7 ↗
57. Architected implant designs for long bones : Advantages of minimal surface-based topologies10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109838 ↗
58. H. Schmidt, F. Heuer, H.J. Wilke, Interaction between finite helical axes and facet joint forces under combined loading., Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 33 (2008) 2741–2748. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31817c4319.10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c4319 ↗
59. M. Takahata, Y. Kotani, K. Abumi, Y. Shikinami, T. Kadosawa, K. Kaneda, A. Minami, Bone ingrowth fixation of artificial intervertebral disc consisting of bioceramic-coated three-dimensional fabric, Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976). 28 (2003) 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000051918.47287.3E.10.1097/01.BRS.0000051918.47287.3E ↗
60. Contribution of facet joints, axial compression, and composition to human lumbar disc torsion mechanics10.1002/jor.23870 ↗
61. What have we learned from finite element model studies of lumbar intervertebral discs in the past four decades?10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.014 ↗
62. Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus10.1007/s10237-004-0053-8 ↗
63. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. neutral zone and instability hypothesis10.1097/00002517-199212000-00002 ↗
64. Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers10.1016/0021-9290(80)90020-2 ↗