Machine learning assisted calibration of a ductile fracture locus model
Source abstract
Abstract
While several different specimen geometries are typically required to calibrate a ductile fracture locus model, this article presents for the first time a calibration methodology that uses one single specimen geometry. This is accomplished by a computational framework that combines finite element modelling (FEM) and artificial neural network (ANN). The combinations of the model parameters are used to generate the training database. The local displacement fields and global force-displacement histories are extracted throughout the complete numerical experiment and passed to the ANN. Therefore, the influence of the local stress state on the evolution of the local deformation is implicitly taken into account. The trained ANN is verified by evaluating its predictability of material parameters of FE simulations unseen in the training stage. The experimental data obtained from the shear tensile test using Digital Image Correlation is introduced to the trained ANN to identify the parameter set that predicts the real mechanical response of the shear specimen. Three different ANN architectures with distinguished input representations are studied. It turns out that all of them can acceptably describe the experimental behaviour of not only the calibration specimen but also the specimens not used for training the model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems
2. Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using artificial neural networks in sheet metal forming10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.032 ↗
3. Determination of deformation and failure properties of ductile materials by means of the small punch test and neural networks10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.031 ↗
4. Identification of ductile damage and fracture parameters from the small punch test using neural networks10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.10.007 ↗
5. Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman parameters identification using artificial neural networks in sheet metal blanking10.1007/s12289-010-0720-5 ↗
6. A large-deformation gradient theory for elastic–plastic materials. Strain softening and regularization of shear bands10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.10.002 ↗
7. ANSYS Documentation: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/.
8. Coupled damage variable based on fracture locus: modelling and calibration10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.11.002 ↗
9. Coupled damage variable based on fracture locus: prediction of ductile failure in a complex structure10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.018 ↗
10. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
11. Impact of fully connected layers on performance of convolutional neural networks for image classification
12. On the path-dependence of the fracture locus in ductile materials. Experiments10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.003 ↗
13. Ductile failure modeling
14. On the path-dependence of the fracture locus in ductile materials – analysis10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.05.003 ↗
15. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912 ↗
16. A modified Lou-Huh model for characterization of ductile fracture of DP590 sheet10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.030 ↗
17. The numerical prediction of ductile fracture of martensitic steel in roll forming10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.04.011 ↗
18. Hybrid experimental–numerical analysis of basic ductile fracture experiments for sheet metals10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.011 ↗
19. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media10.1115/1.3443401 ↗
20. Plastic anisotropy and ductile fracture of bake-hardened AA6013 aluminum sheet10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.015 ↗
21. Fracture envelopes on the 3D-DIC and hybrid inverse methods considering loading history10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108934 ↗
22. A new approach for ductile fracture prediction on Al 2024-T351 alloy10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.01.003 ↗
23. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
24. Understanding convolutional neural networks with a mathematical model10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.11.003 ↗
25. A continous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture10.1115/1.3225775 ↗
26. Modeling of ductile fracture from shear to balanced biaxial tension for sheet metals10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.034 ↗
27. Extension of a shear-controlled ductile fracture model considering the stress triaxiality and the lode parameter10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.007 ↗
28. Identification of material parameters of the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman damage law by combined experimental, numerical sheet metal blanking techniques and artificial neural networks approach
29. Plasticity and ductile fracture behaviour of four Armour steels10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.013 ↗
30. Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002 ↗
31. Failure of metals I – brittle and ductile fracture10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.034 ↗
32. Ductile fracture experiments with locally proportional loading histories10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.004 ↗
33. Determining the strain to fracture for simple shear for a wide range of sheet metals10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.007 ↗
34. Simple introduction to convolutional neural networks
35. Identification of material parameters of a shear modified GTN damage model by small punch test10.1007/s10704-020-00428-4 ↗
36. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗