journal article·2018-09-18

Thrust force characterization of free-swimming soft robotic jellyfish

Jennifer Frame, Nick Lopez, Oscar Curet, Erik D Engeberg

Bioinspiration & Biomimetics· Volume 13· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Five unique soft robotic jellyfish were manufactured with eight pneumatic network tentacle actuators extending radially from their centers. These jellyfish robots were able to freely swim untethered in the ocean, to steer from side to side, and to swim through orifices more narrow than the nominal diameter of the jellyfish. Each of the five jellyfish robots were manufactured with a different composition of body and tentacle actuator Shore hardness. A three-factor study was performed with these five jellyfish robots to determine the impact that actuator material Shore hardness, actuation frequency, and tentacle stroke actuation amplitude had upon the measured thrust force. It was found that all three of these factors significantly impacted mean thrust force generation, which peaked with a half-stroke actuation amplitude at a frequency of 0.8 Hz.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Micro and Nano Robotics · Soft Robotics and Applications · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1089/soro.2015.001910.1089/soro.2015.0019 ↗
2. 10.1089/soro.2013.000110.1089/soro.2013.0001 ↗
3. Faudzi A A M · J. Transp. Syst. Eng. · 2014 · 1 · 12
4. Raj A · Bioinspir. Biomimet. · 2016 · 11
5. 10.1089/soro.2013.000910.1089/soro.2013.0009 ↗
6. Calisti M · Bioinspir. Biomimet. · 2011 · 610.1088/1748-3182/6/3/036002 ↗
7. Cianchetti M · Bioinspir. Biomimet. · 2015 · 1010.1088/1748-3190/10/3/035003 ↗
8. 10.1163/156855312X62634310.1163/156855312X626343 ↗
9. Kim H-J · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2012 · 22
10. 10.1089/soro.2016.004010.1089/soro.2016.0040 ↗
11. 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.36424610.1109/ROBOT.2007.364246 ↗
12. Villanueva A · Bioinspir. Biomimet. · 2011 · 610.1088/1748-3182/6/3/036004 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.131054411110.1073/pnas.1310544111 ↗
14. 10.1073/pnas.130698311010.1073/pnas.1306983110 ↗
15. 10.1242/jeb.0151910.1242/jeb.01519 ↗
16. 10.1098/rsif.2015.038910.1098/rsif.2015.0389 ↗
17. 10.1242/jeb.0064910.1242/jeb.00649 ↗
18. Colin S P · J. Exp. Biol. · 2002 · 205 · 42710.1242/jeb.205.3.427 ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms979010.1038/ncomms9790 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0022-0981(87)80020-510.1016/S0022-0981(87)80020-5 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10750-012-1345-010.1007/s10750-012-1345-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.seares.2007.11.00210.1016/j.seares.2007.11.002 ↗
23. 10.1177/172988141666679610.1177/1729881416666796 ↗
24. 10.1109/ROBIO.2010.572348610.1109/ROBIO.2010.5723486 ↗
25. Tadesse Y · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2012 · 2110.1088/0964-1726/21/4/045013 ↗
26. Najem J · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2012 · 2110.1088/0964-1726/21/9/094026 ↗
27. Yeom S-W · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2009 · 18
28. 10.1109/LRA.2016.252249810.1109/LRA.2016.2522498 ↗
29. Ko Y · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2012 · 21
30. Marut K · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2013 · 2210.1088/0964-1726/22/9/094021 ↗
31. 10.1109/EEEI.2012.637705610.1109/EEEI.2012.6377056 ↗
32. 10.1038/nbt.226910.1038/nbt.2269 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20130328810.1002/adfm.201303288 ↗
34. Frame J · Florida Conf. on Recent Advances in Robotics · 2016 · 100
35. Lopez N · Florida Conf.on Recent Advances in Robotics · 2017
36. 10.1109/IROS.2013.669654910.1109/IROS.2013.6696549 ↗
37. 10.1017/jfm.2017.310.1017/jfm.2017.3 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10750-008-9589-410.1007/s10750-008-9589-4 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60161-X10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60161-X ↗
40. Ogata K · Modern Control Engineering · 2010
41. 10.1017/S002211200800329710.1017/S0022112008003297 ↗
42. 10.1017/jfm.2013.38410.1017/jfm.2013.384 ↗