journal article·2024-05-01Open access

Aerodynamic response of a red-tailed hawk to discrete transverse gusts

Colin Bamford, Paul Swiney, Jack Nix, Tyson L Hedrick, Vrishank Raghav

Bioinspiration & Biomimetics· Volume 19· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract A limiting factor in the design of smaller size uncrewed aerial vehicles is their inability to navigate through gust-laden environments. As a result, engineers have turned towards bio-inspired engineering approaches for gust mitigation techniques. In this study, the aerodynamics of a red-tailed hawk’s response to variable-magnitude discrete transverse gusts was investigated. The hawk was flown in an indoor flight arena instrumented by multiple high-speed cameras to quantify the 3D motion of the bird as it navigated through the gust. The hawk maintained its flapping motion across the gust in all runs; however, it encountered the gust at different points in the flapping pattern depending on the run and gust magnitude. The hawk responded with a downwards pitching motion of the wing, decreasing the wing pitch angle to between −20∘ and −5∘, and remained in this configuration until gust exit. The wing pitch data was then applied to a lower-order aerodynamic model that estimated lift coefficients across the wing. In gusts slower than the forward flight velocity (low gust ratio), the lift coefficient increases at a low-rate, to a maximum of around 2–2.5. In gusts faster than the forward flight velocity (high gust ratio), the lift coefficient initially increased rapidly, before increasing at a low-rate to a value around 4–5. In both regimes, the hawk’s observed height change due to gust interaction was similar (and small), despite larger estimated lift coefficients over the high gust regime. This suggests another mitigation factor apart from the wing response is present. One potential factor is the tail pitching response observed here, which prior work has shown serves to mitigate pitch disturbances from gusts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Restas · World J. Eng. Technol. · 2015 · 3 · 31610.4236/wjet.2015.33C047 ↗
2. Remote sensing UAV/drones and its applications for urban areas: a review10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012003 ↗
3. Jones · Phys. Rev. Fluids · 2020 · 510.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.110513 ↗
4. Fuller · J. Aircr. · 1995 · 32 · 23510.2514/3.46709 ↗
5. Baskaran · Eng. Struct. · 1996 · 18 · 86110.1016/0141-0296(95)00154-9 ↗
6. Murakami · Build. Environ. · 1989 · 24 · 5110.1016/0360-1323(89)90016-4 ↗
7. Shepard · Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B · 2016 · 37110.1098/rstb.2015.0394 ↗
8. Golubev · Int. J. Micro Air Vehicles · 2012 · 4 · 7910.1260/1756-8293.4.1.79 ↗
9. Flight testing and response characteristics of a variable gull-wing morphing aircraft10.2514/6.2004-5113 ↗
10. Jones · Aeronaut. J. · 2005 · 109 · 38510.1017/S0001924000000804 ↗
11. Abbasi · J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 41 · 52410.1007/s40430-019-2044-9 ↗
12. Abbasi · Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 44 · 1238
13. Folkertsma · IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. · 2017 · 24 · 2210.1109/MRA.2016.2636368 ↗
14. Karásek · 2014
15. Ajanic · 2020
16. Fisher · Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2016 · 1110.1088/1748-3190/11/4/046010 ↗
17. Laurent · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. · 2021 · 11810.1073/pnas.2102588118 ↗
18. Reynolds · J. R. Soc. Interface · 2014 · 1110.1098/rsif.2014.0645 ↗
19. Harvey · J. R. Soc. Interface · 2019 · 1610.1098/rsif.2018.0641 ↗
20. Badger · J. Exp. Biol. · 2019 · 22210.1242/jeb.176263 ↗
21. Cheney · Proc. R. Soc. B · 2020 · 28710.1098/rspb.2020.1748 ↗
22. Hedrick · Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2008 · 310.1088/1748-3182/3/3/034001 ↗
23. Preliminary investigation of the aerodynamic response of a red-tailed hawk to a vertical gust10.2514/6.2020-2001 ↗
24. Quinn · R. Soc. Open Sci. · 2017 · 410.1098/rsos.160960 ↗
25. Theriault · J. Exp. Biol. · 2014 · 217 · 184310.1242/jeb.100529 ↗
26. Küssner · 1935
27. Andreu-Angulo · AIAA J. · 2022 · 60 · 527310.2514/1.J061348 ↗
28. Andreu-Angulo · AIAA J. · 2020 · 58 · 512310.2514/1.J059665 ↗
29. Gardiner · PLoS One · 2011 · 610.1371/journal.pone.0018214 ↗
30. Lee · J. Bionic Eng. · 2012 · 9 · 1810.1016/S1672-6529(11)60093-0 ↗
31. Wind tunnel investigation of the static stability and control effectiveness of a rotary tail in a portable uav
32. The phenomenon of dynamic stall