Animal-to-robot social attachment: initial requisites in a gallinaceous bird
Source abstract
Abstract
Animal-Robot Interaction experiments have demonstrated their usefulness to understand the social behaviour of a growing number of animal species. In order to study the mechanisms of social influences (from parents and peers) on behavioural development, we design an experimental setup where young quail chicks, after hatching, continuously live with autonomous mobile robots in mixed triadic groups of two chicks and one robot. As precocial birds are subject to imprinting, we compare groups where chicks meet the robot as their very first social partner, on their first day after hatching (R chicks), with groups where chicks meet a real conspecific first (C chicks), and the robot later (on the second day after hatching). We measured the behavioural synchronization between chicks and robot over three days. Afterwards, we directly tested the existence of a possible social bond between animal and robot, by performing separation-reunion behavioural tests. R chicks were more synchronized with the robot in their daily feeding-resting activities than C chicks. Moreover, R chicks emitted numerous distress calls when separated from the robot, even in the presence of another chick, whereas C chicks emitted calls only when separated from the other chick. Whether the observed chick-robot attachment bond reflects filial, or sibling-imprinting of chicks towards the robot remains unclear, as the latter process is not fully understood in natural familial groups. Still, these results reveal the necessary initial conditions for stable, cohesive mixed groups of chicks and robots, a promising tool to experiment on the long-term dynamics of social behaviour.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Primate Behavior and Ecology · Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior · Animal Behavior and Reproduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1163/156853974X0053410.1163/156853974X00534 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00265-013-1478-910.1007/s00265-013-1478-9 ↗
3. 10.1002/dev.42026030310.1002/dev.420260303 ↗
4. Bohlen M ed Stone W C · More Robots in Cages: Exploring Interactions Between Animals and Robots · 2000
5. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1991.tb01145.x10.1111/j.1469-185X.1991.tb01145.x ↗
6. Braitenberg V · Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology · 1986
7. 10.1371/journal.pone.007612310.1371/journal.pone.0076123 ↗
8. 10.3390/e1603131510.3390/e16031315 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.01510.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.015 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsbl.2014.066510.1098/rsbl.2014.0665 ↗
11. 10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-H10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-H ↗
12. 10.1371/journal.pone.006966110.1371/journal.pone.0069661 ↗
13. 10.2307/408126510.2307/4081265 ↗
14. 10.2307/408200610.2307/4082006 ↗
15. Darczewka M · 1999
16. de Margerie E · Bioinspiration Biomimetics · 2011 · 610.1088/1748-3182/6/3/034001 ↗
17. 10.1002/dev.2101910.1002/dev.21019 ↗
18. 10.1037/0735-7036.104.2.19010.1037/0735-7036.104.2.190 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00265-010-0988-y10.1007/s00265-010-0988-y ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01536.x10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01536.x ↗
21. 10.1080/0742052090289243310.1080/07420520902892433 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00030-110.1016/S0031-9384(03)00030-1 ↗
23. 10.3758/BF0321229410.3758/BF03212294 ↗
24. 10.1371/journal.pone.007272710.1371/journal.pone.0072727 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.02410.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.024 ↗
26. 10.1242/jeb.0100810.1242/jeb.01008 ↗
27. Goth A · Ann. Zoologici Fennici · 2004 · 41 · 823
28. 10.1109/IROS.2010.564954210.1109/IROS.2010.5649542 ↗
29. 10.1109/ROBIO.2012.649102910.1109/ROBIO.2012.6491029 ↗
30. Guyomarc’h J-C · C.R. Acad. Sci., Sci. Vie/Life Sci. · 1996 · 319 · 827
31. 10.1126/science.114425910.1126/science.1144259 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.001460410.1371/journal.pone.0014604 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00013-910.1016/S0149-7634(96)00013-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80150-710.1016/S0003-3472(88)80150-7 ↗
35. 10.1098/rsif.2012.054010.1098/rsif.2012.0540 ↗
36. 10.1038/srep0250310.1038/srep02503 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.01510.1016/j.tree.2011.03.015 ↗
38. 10.1089/zeb.2014.104110.1089/zeb.2014.1041 ↗
39. 10.1002/dev.42019031210.1002/dev.420190312 ↗
40. 10.1081/CBI-10010211210.1081/CBI-100102112 ↗
41. 10.1076/brhm.32.3.373.133910.1076/brhm.32.3.373.1339 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00265-005-0954-210.1007/s00265-005-0954-2 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00028-010.1016/S0149-7634(96)00028-0 ↗
44. Mondada F · In Proc. 9th Conf. on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions · 2009 · 59
45. 10.1073/pnas.023716510010.1073/pnas.0237165100 ↗
46. Ozmon K L · Quail · 1970 · 7 · 2
47. Partan S · Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior · 2004 · 952
48. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.02910.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.029 ↗
49. 10.1038/415279a10.1038/415279a ↗
50. Phamduy P · Bioinspiration Biomimetics · 2014 · 910.1088/1748-3182/9/3/036021 ↗
51. 10.1371/journal.pone.003683510.1371/journal.pone.0036835 ↗
52. 10.1002/dev.2112910.1002/dev.21129 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.02510.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.025 ↗
54. Polverino G · Bioinspiration Biomimetics · 2012 · 710.1088/1748-3182/7/3/036019 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.04710.1016/j.cub.2007.11.047 ↗
56. 10.3727/01561388779191804210.3727/015613887791918042 ↗
57. Schweitzer C · 2009
58. Shi Q · Bioinspiration and Biomimetics · 2013 · 8
59. Shi Q · Bioinspiration and Biomimetics · 2015 · 10
60. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00509.x10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00509.x ↗
61. 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00084-610.1016/S0921-8890(99)00084-6 ↗
62. Vidal J-M · La Recherche · 1976 · 63 · 25
63. 10.1081/CBI-12000422410.1081/CBI-120004224 ↗
64. 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00793.x10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00793.x ↗