journal article·2024-04-01Open access

Surface slicing and toolpath planning for in-situ bioprinting of skin implants

Muhammad Salman Chaudhry, Aleksander Czekanski

Biofabrication· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract Bioprinting has emerged as a successful method for fabricating engineered tissue implants, offering great potential for wound healing applications. This study focuses on an advanced surface-based slicing approach aimed at designing a skin implant specifically for in-situ bioprinting. The slicing step plays a crucial role in determining the layering arrangement of the tissue during printing. By utilizing surface slicing, a significant shift from planar fabrication methods is achieved. The developed methodology involves the utilization of a customized robotic printer to deliver biomaterials. A multilayer slicing and toolpath generation procedure is presented, enabling the fabrication of skin implants that incorporate the epidermal, dermal, and hypodermal layers. One notable advantage of using the approximate representation of the native wound site surface as the slicing surface is the avoidance of planar printing effects such as staircasing. This surface slicing method allows for the design of non-planar and ultra-thin skin implants, ensuring a higher degree of geometric match between the implant and the wound interface. Furthermore, the proposed methodology demonstrates superior surface quality of the in-situ bio-printed implant on a hand model, validating its ability to create toolpaths on implants with complex surfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. In situ three-dimensional printing for reparative and regenerative therapy10.1007/s10544-019-0372-2 ↗
2. Overview of current advances in extrusion bioprinting for skin applications10.3390/ijms21186679 ↗
3. In situ bioprinting—bioprinting from benchside to bedside?10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.045 ↗
4. Implications of the acute and chronic inflammatory response and the foreign body reaction to the immune response of implanted biomaterials
5. 3D bioprinting of in vitro models using hydrogel-based bioinks10.3390/polym13030366 ↗
6. Khademhosseini · 2018
7. Control of innate immune response by biomaterial surface topography, energy, and stiffness10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.021 ↗
8. Clinically relevant bioprinting workflow and imaging process for tissue construct design and validation10.1089/3dp.2017.0075 ↗
9. 3D bioprinting strategies for articular cartilage tissue engineering10.1007/s10439-023-03236-8 ↗
10. The arrival of commercial bioprinters—towards 3D bioprinting revolution!10.18063/ijb.v4i2.139 ↗
11. Ten challenges in 3D printing10.1007/s00366-015-0407-0 ↗
12. Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin10.1038/nature05664 ↗
13. Handheld skin printer: in situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues10.1039/C7LC01236E ↗
14. Skin bioprinting: a novel approach for creating artificial skin from synthetic and natural building blocks10.1007/s40204-018-0087-0 ↗
15. Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds10.5966/sctm.2012-0088 ↗
16. In situ bioprinting of the skin for burns10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.198 ↗
17. Binder · 2011
18. Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0397 ↗
19. Evaluating FDM process parameter sensitive mechanical performance of elastomers at various strain rates of loading10.3390/ma13143202 ↗
20. Performance of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane under quasi-static and high-strain rate loading
21. Slicing procedures for layered manufacturing techniques10.1016/0010-4485(94)90032-9 ↗
22. Adaptive direct slicing with non-uniform cusp heights for rapid prototyping10.1007/s00170-002-1523-8 ↗
23. Local adaptive slicing10.1108/13552549810222993 ↗
24. Automatic multi-direction slicing algorithms for wire based additive manufacturing10.1016/j.rcim.2015.09.002 ↗
25. Inclined layer printing for fused deposition modeling without assisted supporting structure10.1016/j.rcim.2017.11.011 ↗
26. In vitro and in vivo analysis of visible light crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels10.1039/C7BM00110J ↗
27. Extruder path generation for curved layer fused deposition modeling10.1016/j.cad.2007.10.014 ↗
28. Modeling and evaluation of curved layer fused deposition10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.001 ↗
29. 3D printing of nonplanar layers for smooth surface generation10.1109/COASE.2019.8843116 ↗
30. Robotic platform and path planning algorithm for in situ bioprinting10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00139 ↗
31. A fully automatic non-planar slicing algorithm for the additive manufacturing of complex geometries10.1016/j.addma.2023.103541 ↗
32. Robotic additive turning with a novel cylindrical slicing method10.1007/s00170-021-08567-1 ↗
33. Nonplanar 3D printing of bifurcating forms10.1089/3dp.2021.0023 ↗
34. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗
35. Non-planar embedded 3D printing for complex hydrogel manufacturing10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00242 ↗
36. The skin (human anatomy): picture, definition, function, and skin conditions
37. The applied anatomy of human skin: a model for regeneration10.1016/j.wndm.2020.100179 ↗
38. Mechanical behaviour of skin: a review
39. Age-dependent biomechanical properties of the skin10.5114/pdia.2013.38359 ↗
40. Contact modelling of human skin: what value to use for the modulus of elasticity?10.1177/1350650112463307 ↗
41. Current and future perspectives on skin tissue engineering: key features of biomedical research, translational assessment, and clinical application10.1002/adhm.201801471 ↗
42. Piegl · 1995
43. Slicer mnaual- flow math
44. Systematic optimization of visible light-induced crosslinking conditions of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)10.1038/s41598-021-02830-x ↗
45. 3D-bioprinting of polylactic acid (PLA) nanofiber–alginate hydrogel bioink containing human adipose-derived stem cells10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00196 ↗
46. Simple method for constructing NURBS surfaces from unorganized points
47. Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone–implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient’s mouth10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104854 ↗
48. Host response to synthetic versus natural biomaterials
49. Molecular events at tissue–biomaterial interface