A targeted rheological bioink development guideline and its systematic correlation with printing behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Bioprinting for tissue or disease models is a promising but complex process involving biofabrication, cell culture and a carrier material known as bioink. The native extracellular matrix (ECM), which forms the scaffold for cells in vivo, consists of several components including collagen as a gelling agent to confer mechanical stiffness and provide a substrate for cell attachment. Bioprinting therefore needs an artificial ECM that fulfills the same functions as its natural counterpart during and after the printing process. The combination of bioink materials determines the immune response of the host, cell compatibility and adhesion. Here we evaluate multi-material blending with four pre-selected components using a design of experiments approach. Our exemplary designed hydrogel is highly reproducible for the development of artificial ECM and can be expanded to incorporate additional requirements. The bioink displays shear-thinning behavior and a high zero-shear viscosity, which is essential for the printing process. We assessed the printing behavior of our bioink over a wide range of the key process parameters for extrusion-based bioprinting (temperature, pressure, feed rate, and nozzle geometry). Several processing temperatures were linked by rheological measurements directly to the 3D printing process. The printing results were evaluated using a self-developed categoric strand screening process, varying the feed rate and pressure with a fixed nozzle. Accordingly, nozzles differing in size and shape were evaluated and the interactions between printing pressure and feed rate were characterized separately by applying a modified O-R-O test. We tested the short-term cultivation stability of our bioink to mimic the hypothermic and hyperthermic conditions of the human body. As result we present an expandable concept for bioink development and a highly reproducible and well-characterized procedure for printing with the newly developed hydrogel. We provide detailed insights into the relationship between printing parameters, rheological parameters and short-term cultivation stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Biomaterials for personalized cell therapy10.1002/adma.201902005 ↗
2. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
3. A perspective on the physical, mechanical and biological specifications of bioinks and the development of functional tissues in 3D bioprinting10.1016/j.bprint.2018.02.003 ↗
4. The extracellular matrix: Tools and insights for the ‘omics’ era10.1016/j.matbio.2015.06.003 ↗
5. Concise review: bioprinting of stem cells for transplantable tissue fabrication10.1002/sctm.17-0148 ↗
6. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 ↗
7. Natural polymers for the microencapsulation of cells10.1098/rsif.2014.0817 ↗
8. 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication10.1002/adma.201302042 ↗
9. Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00303 ↗
10. Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting10.3390/molecules21060685 ↗
11. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 ↗
12. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 ↗
13. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity10.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗
14. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks10.1002/adhm.201601451 ↗
15. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
16. Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting10.1038/srep29977 ↗
17. Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e ↗
18. The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 ↗
19. 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel10.3390/ma11030454 ↗
20. Carrageenan based hydrogels for drug delivery, tissue engineering and wound healing10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.086 ↗
21. 3D printing using plant-derived cellulose and its derivatives: A review10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.027 ↗
22. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 ↗
23. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture10.1038/nmeth.3839 ↗
24. Chemical tailoring of gelatin to adjust its chemical and physical properties for functional bioprinting10.1039/c3tb20745e ↗
25. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: A materials science perspective10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y ↗
26. Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin-alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells10.1088/1758-5090/ab0692 ↗
27. Three-dimensional bioprinting of complex cell laden alginate hydrogel structures10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045012 ↗
28. Engineering bioprintable alginate/gelatin composite hydrogels withtunable mechanical and cell adhesive properties to modulate tumorspheroid growth kinetics10.1088/1758-5090/ab3a5c ↗
29. Extrusion-based printing of sacrificial Carbopol ink for fabrication of microfluidic devices10.1088/1758-5090/ab10ae ↗
30. Stabilized stress–velocity–pressure finite element formulations of the Navier–Stokes problem for fluids with non-linear viscosity10.1016/j.cma.2014.07.003 ↗
31. Bioprinted chitosan-gelatin thermosensitive hydrogels using an inexpensive 3D printer10.1088/1758-5090/aa96dd ↗
32. Parameter optimization for 3D bioprinting of hydrogels10.1016/j.bprint.2017.09.001 ↗
33. Green bioprinting: extrusion-based fabrication of plant cell-laden biopolymer hydrogel scaffolds10.1088/1758-5090/aa8854 ↗
34. Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7 ↗
35. Nanostructured Pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035006 ↗
36. Pre-set extrusion bioprinting for multiscale heterogeneous tissue structure fabrication10.1088/1758-5090/aac70b ↗
37. Directing the self-assembly of tumour spheroids by bioprinting cellular heterogeneous models within alginate/gelatin hydrogels10.1038/s41598-017-04691-9 ↗
38. 3D bioprinting of a hyaluronan bioink through enzymatic-and visible light-crosslinking10.1088/1758-5090/aadf58 ↗
39. High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks10.1088/1758-5090/ab3524 ↗
40. Multiple steps and critical behaviors of the binding of calcium to alginate10.1021/jp0689870 ↗