Rational design of 3D-printed scaffolds for breast tissue engineering using structural analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Best cosmetic outcomes of breast reconstruction using tissue engineering techniques rely on the scaffold architecture and material, which are currently both to be determined. This study suggests an approach for a rational design of breast-shaped scaffold architecture, in which structural analysis is implemented to predict its stiffness and adjust it to that of the native tissue. This approach can help achieve the goal of optimal scaffold architecture for breast tissue engineering. Based on specifications defined in a preliminary implantation study of a non-rationally designed scaffold, and using analytical modeling and finite element analysis, we rationally designed a polycaprolactone made, 3D-printed, highly porous, breast-shaped scaffold with a stiffness similar to the breast adipose tissue. This scaffold had an architecture of a double-shelled dome connected by pillars, with no bottom to allow direct contact of its fat graft with the host’s blood vessels (shelled hemisphere adaptive design (SHAD)). To demonstrate the potential of the SHAD scaffold in breast tissue engineering, a proof-of-concept study was performed, in which SHAD scaffolds were embedded with human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells, isolated from lipoaspirates, and implanted in nod-scid-gamma mouse model with a delayed fat graft injection. After 4 weeks of implantation, the SHAD implants were vascularized with a viable fat graft, indicating the suitability of the SHAD scaffold for breast tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing in breast reconstruction: from bench to bed10.3389/fsurg.2021.641370 ↗
2. Transformation of breast reconstruction via additive biomanufacturing10.1038/srep28030 ↗
3. Additive biomanufacturing of scaffolds for breast reconstruction10.1016/j.addma.2019.100845 ↗
4. The evolving function of vasculature and pro-angiogenic therapy in fat grafting10.1177/09636897241264976 ↗
5. Sustained regeneration of high-volume adipose tissue for breast reconstruction using computer aided design and biomanufacturing10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.025 ↗
6. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells for breast tissue regeneration10.2217/rme-2020-0045 ↗
7. Biomimetic 3D tissue printing for soft tissue regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.043 ↗
8. Engineering densely packed adipose tissue via environmentally controlled in-bath 3D bioprinting10.1002/adfm.202200203 ↗
9. Biomechanical principles of breast implants and current state of research in soft tissue engineering for cosmetic breast augmentation10.1007/s00266-021-02559-y ↗
10. Effect of 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffold with a bionic structure on the early stage of fat grafting10.1016/j.msec.2021.111973 ↗
11. Tuning the mechanics of 3D-printed scaffolds by crystal lattice-like structural design for breast tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab52ea ↗
12. Sultana · 2018 · 1
13. Comparison of the mechanobiological performance of bone tissue scaffolds based on different unit cell geometries10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.008 ↗
14. Redefining architectural effects in 3D printed scaffolds through rational design for optimal bone tissue regeneration10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101168 ↗
15. Analytical relationships for the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials based on octahedral unit cells10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.076 ↗
16. Computational design of curvilinear bone scaffolds fabricated via direct ink writing10.1016/j.cad.2017.09.003 ↗
17. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
18. Human-engineered auricular reconstruction (hEAR) by 3D-printed molding with human-derived auricular and costal chondrocytes and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells10.1088/1758-5090/ac3b91 ↗
19. Biomechanical properties of breast tissue, a state-of-the-art review10.1007/s10237-016-0763-8 ↗
20. Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast10.3233/THC-2007-15404 ↗
21. Association of adiponectin and resistin with adipose tissue compartments, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00410.x ↗
22. Fabrication of engineered vascular flaps using 3D printing technologies10.3791/63920 ↗
23. Rapid prototyping fabrication of soft and oriented polyester scaffolds for axonal guidance10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120062 ↗
24. Sensitive material behavior: theoretical model and experiment for compression collapse of gold particles at submicron scale10.1115/1.4027916 ↗
25. Manual isolation of adipose-derived stem cells from human lipoaspirates10.3791/50585 ↗
26. Of mice and men: pinpointing species differences in adipose tissue biology10.3389/fcell.2022.1003118 ↗
27. Chapter 30—breast tissue engineering: implantation and three-dimensional tissue test system applications
28. Proangiogenic features of mesenchymal stem cells and their therapeutic applications10.1155/2016/1314709 ↗
29. Implant fibrosis and the underappreciated role of myofibroblasts in the foreign body reaction10.3390/cells10071794 ↗
30. Substrate stiffness regulates proinflammatory mediator production through TLR4 activity in macrophages10.1371/journal.pone.0145813 ↗
31. Mechanical properties of breast periprosthetic capsules and the correlation to capsule contracture10.1177/228080000500300307 ↗
32. The fibrous capsules around static and dynamic implants: their biochemical, histological, and ultrastructural characteristics10.1097/00000637-198709000-00005 ↗
33. Occurrence and activity of myofibroblasts in human capsular tissue surrounding mammary implants10.1097/00006534-198112000-00010 ↗
34. Engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials to tune the inflammatory response10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009 ↗
35. Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.056 ↗
36. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
37. Additive manufacturing—state of art10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.728 ↗