journal article·2023-04-01Open access

Additive manufacturing and performance of bioceramic scaffolds with different hollow strut geometries

Shumin Pang, Dongwei Wu, Aleksander Gurlo, Jens Kurreck, Dorian A H Hanaor

Biofabrication· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract Additively manufactured hollow-strut bioceramic scaffolds present a promising strategy towards enhanced performance in patient-tailored bone tissue engineering. The channels in such scaffolds offer pathways for nutrient and cell transport and facilitate effective osseointegration and vascularization. In this study, we report an approach for the slurry based additive manufacturing of modified diopside bioceramics that enables the production of hollow-strut scaffolds with diverse cross-sectional forms, distinguished by different configurations of channel and strut geometries. The prepared scaffolds exhibit levels of porosity and mechanical strength that are well suited for osteoporotic bone repair. Mechanical characterization in orthogonal orientations revealed that a square outer cross-section for hollow struts in woodpile scaffolds gives rise to levels of compressive strength that are higher than those of conventional solid cylindrical strut scaffolds despite a significantly lower density. Finite element analysis confirms that this improved strength arises from lower stress concentration in such geometries. It was shown that hollow struts in bioceramic scaffolds dramatically increase cell attachment and proliferation, potentially promoting new bone tissue formation within the scaffold channel. This work provides an easily controlled method for the extrusion-based 3D printing of hollow strut scaffolds. We show here how the production of hollow struts with controllable geometry can serve to enhance both the functional and mechanical performance of porous structures, with particular relevance for bone tissue engineering scaffolds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 ↗
2. 3D printing of sponge spicules-inspired flexible bioceramic-based scaffolds10.1088/1758-5090/ac66ff ↗
3. Clean bioprinting—fabrication of 3D organ models devoid of animal components10.14573/altex.2009151 ↗
4. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004 ↗
5. 3D printed Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds with different pore structure effects on bone ingrowth10.1186/s13036-021-00255-8 ↗
6. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
7. Arrayed hollow channels in silk‐based scaffolds provide functional outcomes for engineering critically sized tissue constructs10.1002/adfm.201302901 ↗
8. Three-dimensional printing of hollow-struts-packed bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1021/acsami.5b08911 ↗
9. Fabrication and application of a 3D-printed poly-ϵ-caprolactone cage scaffold for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.026 ↗
10. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous bi-and tri-layered hollow channels within gel scaffolds using scalable multi-axial microfluidic extrusion nozzle10.1088/1758-5090/aaf7c7 ↗
11. Architectural design of 3D printed scaffolds controls the volume and functionality of newly formed bone10.1002/adhm.201801353 ↗
12. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry10.1039/C4BM00291A ↗
13. Porosity and pore size effect on the properties of sintered Ti35Nb4Sn alloy scaffolds and their suitability for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.026 ↗
14. Direct plotting of three‐dimensional hollow fiber scaffolds based on concentrated alginate pastes for tissue engineering10.1002/adhm.201200303 ↗
15. Coextrusion-based 3D plotting of ceramic pastes for porous calcium phosphate scaffolds comprised of hollow filaments10.3390/ma11060911 ↗
16. 3D printed coaxial nozzles for the extrusion of hydrogel tubes toward modeling vascular endothelium10.1088/1758-5090/ab2b4d ↗
17. High performing additively manufactured bone scaffolds based on copper substituted diopside10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110480 ↗
18. Mechanical characterization of dense calcium phosphate bioceramics with interconnected porosity10.1007/s10856-007-3136-0 ↗
19. Study of diopside ceramics for biomaterials10.1023/A:1008996908797 ↗
20. Finite element analysis of porosity effects on mechanical properties for tissue engineering scaffold10.33263/BRIAC112.88368843 ↗
21. Bionic design and 3D printing of porous titanium alloy scaffolds for bone tissue repair10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.094 ↗
22. Bioprinted cancer model of neuroblastoma in a renal microenvironment as an efficiently applicable drug testing platform10.3390/ijms23010122 ↗
23. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
24. Extrusion 3D printing of polymeric materials with advanced properties10.1002/advs.202001379 ↗
25. Clay in situ resource utilization with Mars global simulant slurries for additive manufacturing and traditional shaping of unfired green bodies10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.04.064 ↗
26. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity10.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
27. Pluronic F127 hydrogel characterization and biofabrication in cellularized constructs for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.procir.2015.11.001 ↗
28. 3D bioprinting of gellan gum and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.040 ↗
29. Chemical modification and printability of shear-thinning hydrogel inks for direct-write 3D printing10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.070 ↗
30. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
31. 3D-printed scaffolds with synergistic effect of hollow-pipe structure and bioactive ions for vascularized bone regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.005 ↗
32. Accessible bioprinting: adaptation of a low-cost 3D-printer for precise cell placement and stem cell differentiation10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025017 ↗
33. Efficient fabrication of polycaprolactone scaffolds for printing hybrid tissue-engineered constructs10.3390/ma12040613 ↗
34. Dielectric resonator antenna with Y3Al5O12 transparent dielectric ceramics for 5G millimeter‐wave applications10.1111/jace.17878 ↗
36. Compressive behaviour of gyroid lattice structures for human cancellous bone implant applications10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.016 ↗
37. Fabrication of two distinct hydroxyapatite coatings and their effects on MC3T3-E1 cell behavior10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.046 ↗
38. Tuning inflammation response via adjusting microstructure of hydroxyapatite and biomolecules modification10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.026 ↗
39. Influence of pore size of porous titanium fabricated by vacuum diffusion bonding of titanium meshes on cell penetration and bone ingrowth10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.022 ↗
40. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of finely tuned pore architecture of bioactive scaffolds before clinical translation10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.003 ↗
41. Vascularization of hollow channel-modified porous silk scaffolds with endothelial cells for tissue regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.053 ↗
42. Impact of 3D printed PLA-and chitosan-based scaffolds on human monocyte/macrophage responses: unraveling the effect of 3D structures on inflammation10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.035 ↗
43. In vitro assessment of three-dimensionally plotted nagelschmidtite bioceramic scaffolds with varied macropore morphologies10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.011 ↗