journal article·2024-10-01Open access

Constraint based Bayesian optimization of bioink precursor: a machine learning framework

Yihao Xu, Rokeya Sarah, Ahasan Habib, Yongmin Liu, Bashir Khoda

Biofabrication· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract Current research practice for optimizing bioink involves exhaustive experimentation with multi-material composition for determining the printability, shape fidelity and biocompatibility. Predicting bioink properties can be beneficial to the research community but is a challenging task due to the non-Newtonian behavior in complex composition. Existing models such as Cross model become inadequate for predicting the viscosity for heterogeneous composition of bioinks. In this paper, we utilize a machine learning framework to accurately predict the viscosity of heterogeneous bioink compositions, aiming to enhance extrusion-based bioprinting techniques. Utilizing Bayesian optimization (BO), our strategy leverages a limited dataset to inform our model. This is a technique especially useful of the typically sparse data in this domain. Moreover, we have also developed a mask technique that can handle complex constraints, informed by domain expertise, to define the feasible parameter space for the components of the bioink and their interactions. Our proposed method is focused on predicting the intrinsic factor (e.g. viscosity) of the bioink precursor which is tied to the extrinsic property (e.g. cell viability) through the mask function. Through the optimization of the hyperparameter, we strike a balance between exploration of new possibilities and exploitation of known data, a balance crucial for refining our acquisition function. This function then guides the selection of subsequent sampling points within the defined viable space and the process continues until convergence is achieved, indicating that the model has sufficiently explored the parameter space and identified the optimal or near-optimal solutions. Employing this AI-guided BO framework, we have developed, tested, and validated a surrogate model for determining the viscosity of heterogeneous bioink compositions. This data-driven approach significantly reduces the experimental workload required to identify bioink compositions conducive to functional tissue growth. It not only streamlines the process of finding the optimal bioink compositions from a vast array of heterogeneous options but also offers a promising avenue for accelerating advancements in tissue engineering by minimizing the need for extensive experimental trials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00158 ↗
2. 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication10.1002/adma.201302042 ↗
3. Decoupling the dependence of rheological/mechanical properties of hydrogels from solids concentration10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00559-1 ↗
4. Bioprinting technology: a current state-of-the-art review10.1115/1.4028512 ↗
5. Three-dimensional bioprinting applications for bone tissue engineering10.3390/cells12091230 ↗
6. The bioprinting roadmap10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158 ↗
7. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034 ↗
8. Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells10.1039/C3BM00012E ↗
9. Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/ab0631 ↗
10. Inkjet printing of viable mammalian cells10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.011 ↗
11. Predictive modeling of droplet formation processes in inkjet-based bioprinting10.1115/1.4040877 ↗
12. Optimization of dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of SLA patterns and SLA-based IC components10.3390/polym15204038 ↗
13. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 ↗
14. 3D bioprinting using hydrogels: cell inks and tissue engineering applications10.3390/pharmaceutics14122596 ↗
15. A rheological study of bio-ink: shear stress and cell viability10.1115/MSEC2021-63996 ↗
16. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: past, present and future10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012 ↗
17. Improving piezoelectric cell printing accuracy and reliability through neutral buoyancy of suspensions10.1002/bit.24562 ↗
18. A state‐of‐the‐art review of laser‐assisted bioprinting and its future research trends10.1002/cben.202000037 ↗
19. Laser-induced forward transfer based laser bioprinting in biomedical applications10.3389/fbioe.2023.1255782 ↗
20. Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting10.1002/adhm.201901798 ↗
21. Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015 ↗
22. Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗
23. Mechanical behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.018 ↗
24. Calcium alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose beads for colon-targeted drug delivery10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.12.052 ↗
25. Alginate-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting and fabrication of anatomically accurate bone grafts10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0305 ↗
26. 3D-bioprinting of polylactic acid (PLA) nanofiber–alginate hydrogel bioink containing human adipose-derived stem cells10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00196 ↗
27. Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocellulose/alginate bioink10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y ↗
28. Direct ink write 3D printed cellulose nanofiber aerogel structures with highly deformable, shape recoverable, and functionalizable properties10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03439 ↗
29. Development of clay based novel hybrid bio-ink for 3D bio-printing process10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.034 ↗
30. Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink10.1002/adma.201503310 ↗
31. 3D bioprinting of methylcellulose/gelatin-methacryloyl (MC/GelMA) bioink with high shape integrity10.1021/acsabm.0c00169 ↗
32. Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96 ↗
33. The rheology of direct and suspended extrusion bioprinting10.1063/5.0031475 ↗
34. Modulating rheological characteristics of bio-ink with component weight and shear rate for enhanced bioprinted scaffold fidelity10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00332 ↗
35. Computational approaches for understanding and predicting the self-assembled peptide hydrogels10.1016/j.cocis.2022.101645 ↗
36. Rheology of dilute and semidilute noncolloidal hard sphere suspensions10.1122/1.2992600 ↗
37. Rheological characterization of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose wet masses using a mixer torque rheometer10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00219-7 ↗
38. Use of microfibrillated cellulose/lignosulfonate blends as carbon precursors: impact of hydrogel rheology on 3D printing10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02763 ↗
39. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.041 ↗
40. Accelerated discovery of 3D printing materials using data-driven multiobjective optimization10.1126/sciadv.abf7435 ↗
41. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707 ↗
42. Printability and cell viability in extrusion-based bioprinting from experimental, computational, and machine learning views10.3390/jfb13020040 ↗
43. Application of machine learning in 3D bioprinting: focus on development of big data and digital twin10.18063/ijb.v7i1.342 ↗
44. Analyzing and predicting the viscosity of polymer nanocomposites in the conditions of temperature, shear rate, and nanoparticle loading with molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c01697 ↗
45. Hierarchical machine learning for high-fidelity 3D printed biopolymers10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00755 ↗
46. Parameter optimization for 3D bioprinting of hydrogels10.1016/j.bprint.2017.09.001 ↗
47. Coupling machine learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914 ↗
48. Bioink formulation and machine learning-empowered bioprinting optimization10.3389/fbioe.2022.913579 ↗
49. Probabilistic representation and inverse design of metamaterials based on a deep generative model with semi-supervised learning strategy10.1002/adma.201901111 ↗
50. Machine learning in tissue engineering10.1089/ten.tea.2022.0128 ↗
51. Freedman · 2009
52. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018.pdf ↗
53. Discriminatory analysis. Nonparametric discrimination: consistency properties10.2307/1403797 ↗
54. Fiber filled hybrid hydrogel for bio-manufacturing10.1115/1.4049479 ↗
55. 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel10.3390/ma11030454 ↗
56. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design10.1038/ncomms11241 ↗
57. Accelerated search for BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics with vertical morphotropic phase boundary using Bayesian learning10.1073/pnas.1607412113 ↗
58. A 3D‐printed hybrid nasal cartilage with functional electronic olfaction10.1002/advs.201901878 ↗
59. Freeform drop-on-demand laser printing of 3D alginate and cellular constructs10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045011 ↗
60. Effect of varying cell densities on the rheological properties of the bioink10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00241 ↗
61. Eine neue Bestimmung der Moleküldimensionen