journal article·2020-10-01

Digestion degree is a key factor to regulate the printability of pure tendon decellularized extracellular matrix bio-ink in extrusion-based 3D cell printing

Fengyuan Zhao, Jin Cheng, Muyang Sun, Huilei Yu, Nier Wu, Zong Li, Jiahao Zhang, Qi Li, Peng Yang, Qiang Liu, Xiaoqing Hu, Yingfang Ao

Biofabrication· Volume 12· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Improving the printability of pure, decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) bio-ink without altering its physiological components has been a challenge in three-dimensional (3D) cell printing. To improve the printability of the bio-ink, we first investigated the digestion process of the powdered dECM material obtained from porcine tendons. We manifested the digestion process of tendon derived dECM powders, which includes dissolution, gelatinization and solubilization. After a short dissolution period (around 10 min), we observed a ‘High viscosity slurry’ status (3 h) of the dECM precursors, i.e. the gelatinization process, followed by the solubilization processes, i.e. a ‘Medium viscosity slurry’ period (12 h) and a ‘Low viscosity slurry’ period (72 h). The ‘Medium viscosity slurry’ status of the dECM bio-ink was inhomogeneous and could not be extruded out from the barrel after the pH value was neutralized to 7.4. Although the ‘Low viscosity slurry’ status of the dECM bio-ink has been reported to be extrudable, it has poor printability. This study explores the printability of the ‘High viscosity slurry’ status of the dECM bio-ink, which has not been addressed thus far. The results demonstrate that this less digested status of the dECM bio-ink yields higher shape fidelity and stacking accuracy than the traditional over-digested status of the dECM bio-ink; this indicates better printability of this less digested dECM bio-ink. We compared the performance of the two bio-inks using cell viability tests for 3D cell printing. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from rats was printed using the ‘High viscosity slurry’ status of the dECM bio-ink, yielding high cellular viability lasting for 7 d after printing. Thus, the ‘High viscosity slurry’ status of tendon dECM bio-ink can be utilized to fabricate complicated 3D organoid structures; it also shows promise for applications such as regenerative medicine and biomimetic tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity10.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
2. Ozbolat · 2016
3. A bioprinted human-glioblastoma-on-a-chip for the identification of patient-specific responses to chemoradiotherapy10.1038/s41551-019-0363-x ↗
4. Advances in hydrogels in organoids and organs-on-a-chip10.1002/adma.201902042 ↗
5. The bioprinting roadmap10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158 ↗
6. Functionalizing bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.012 ↗
7. 3D bioprinting: from benches to translational applications10.1002/smll.201805510 ↗
8. Bioprinting functional tissues10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.009 ↗
9. Decellularized extracellular matrix: a step towards the next generation source for bioink manufacturing10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e98 ↗
10. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 ↗
11. Aqueous two-phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous hydrogels10.1002/adma.201805460 ↗
12. 3D bioprinting of hydrogel-based biomimetic microenvironments10.1002/jbm.b.34262 ↗
13. Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908 ↗
14. Decellularized matrices in regenerative medicine10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.044 ↗
15. “Tissue Papers” from organ-specific decellularized extracellular matrices10.1002/adfm.201700992 ↗
16. Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bio-ink with enhanced 3D printability and mechanical properties10.1088/1758-5090/ab5d80 ↗
17. Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.013 ↗
18. A 3D cell printed muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036 ↗
19. 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts10.1002/advs.201900344 ↗
20. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink10.1038/ncomms4935 ↗
21. Rheology and confocal reflectance microscopy as probes of mechanical properties and structure during collagen and collagen/hyaluronan self-assembly10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.063 ↗
22. A bioprinted cardiac patch composed of cardiac-specific extracellular matrix and progenitor cells for heart repair10.1002/adhm.201800672 ↗
23. A photo-crosslinkable kidney ECM-derived bioink accelerates renal tissue formation10.1002/adhm.201800992 ↗
24. Development of bioink from decellularized tendon extracellular matrix for 3D bioprinting10.1002/mabi.201800024 ↗
25. 3D cell printing of islet-laden pancreatic tissue-derived extracellular matrix bioink constructs for enhancing pancreatic functions10.1039/C8TB02787K ↗
26. Microfracture combined with functional pig peritoneum-derived acellular matrix for cartilage repair in rabbit models10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.055 ↗
27. Precise stacking of decellularized extracellular matrix based 3D cell-laden constructs by a 3D cell printing system equipped with heating modules10.1038/s41598-017-09201-5 ↗
28. 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6 ↗
29. Printability and cell viability in bioprinting alginate dialdehyde-gelatin scaffolds10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00167 ↗
30. Structurally and functionally optimized silk-fibroin–gelatin scaffold using 3D printing to repair cartilage injury in vitro and in vivo10.1002/adma.201701089 ↗
31. Three-dimensional bioprinting of complex cell laden alginate hydrogel structures10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045012 ↗
32. Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: structure and function10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.068 ↗
33. Fiber reinforced cartilage ECM functionalized bioinks for functional cartilage tissue engineering10.1002/adhm.201801501 ↗
34. Three-dimensional printing of bone extracellular matrix for craniofacial regeneration10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00101 ↗
35. Multi-level customized 3D printing for autogenous implants in skull tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab1400 ↗
36. Assembly of type I collagen: fusion of fibril subunits and the influence of fibril diameter on mechanical properties10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00089-5 ↗
37. Self-assembly of collagen-based biomaterials: preparation, characterizations and biomedical applications10.1039/C7TB02999C ↗
38. Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031 ↗
39. Dynamic shear-influenced collagen self-assembly10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.070 ↗
40. Characterization of permeability and network structure of interfacially photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00025-8 ↗
41. Permeability mapping of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.006 ↗
42. Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes10.1002/biot.200900004 ↗
43. “Printability’’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing: state-of-the-art10.1002/adhm.201700264 ↗
44. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity10.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗