Conformal High-Aspect-Ratio Solid Electrolyte Thin Films for Li-Ion Batteries by Atomic Layer Deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Lithium phosphorus oxynitride (LiPON) is a state-of-the-art solid electrolyte material for thin-film microbatteries. These applications require conformal thin films on challenging 3D surface structures, and among the advanced thin-film deposition techniques, atomic layer deposition (ALD) is believed to stand out in terms of producing appreciably conformal thin films. Here we quantify the conformality (i.e., the evenness of deposition) of thin ALD-grown LiPON films using lateral high-aspect-ratio test structures. Two different lithium precursors, lithium tert -butoxide (LiO t Bu) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (Li-HMDS), were investigated in combination with diethyl phosphoramidate as the source of oxygen, phosphorus, and nitrogen. The results indicate that the film growth proceeded significantly deeper into the 3D cavities for the films grown from LiO t Bu, while the Li-HMDS-based films grew more evenly initially, right after the cavity entrances. These observations can be explained by differences in the precursor diffusion and reactivity. The results open possibilities for the use of LiPON as a solid electrolyte in batteries with high-surface-area electrodes. This could enable faster charging and discharging as well as the use of thin-film technology in fabricating thin-film electrodes of meaningful charge capacity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland
Chipmetrics Ltd., Yliopistokatu 7, Joensuu FI-80130, Finland
Funding
H2020 European Research Council
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20220053810.1002/adma.202200538 ↗
2. 10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20160140210.1002/aenm.201601402 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20100000210.1002/aenm.201000002 ↗
5. 10.3390/coatings1303050510.3390/coatings13030505 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c1000110.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10001 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.8b1636410.1021/acsami.8b16364 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8TA00804C10.1039/C8TA00804C ↗
9. 10.1149/1.183744310.1149/1.1837443 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.08710.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.087 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b1224410.1021/acsami.6b12244 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00543-610.1016/S0040-6090(02)00543-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.109 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0219910.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02199 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0165410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01654 ↗
16. 10.1149/2.0371613jes10.1149/2.0371613jes ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0080510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00805 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0305810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03058 ↗
19. 10.1039/D1DT03736F10.1039/D1DT03736F ↗
20. 10.1088/1674-1056/ac373610.1088/1674-1056/ac3736 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.10228010.1016/j.surfin.2022.102280 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23305610.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233056 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.1c1751910.1021/acsami.1c17519 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.1191906jes10.1149/2.1191906jes ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20070239810.1002/adma.200702398 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.5b1250010.1021/acsami.5b12500 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.506096710.1063/1.5060967 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20130612610.1002/adma.201306126 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.13310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.133 ↗
30. Utriainen, M.; Saastamoinen, K.; Rekola, H.; Ylivaara, O. M. E.; Puurunen, R. L.; Hyttinen, P. Optical Metrology of 3D Thin Film Conformality by LHAR Chip Assisted Method. In SPIE OPTO 2022, Proceedings of SPIE 12008, Photonic Instrumentation Engineering IX, San Francisco, CA, March 5, 2022; Buse, L. E., Soskind, Y., Eds. SPIE, 2022; p 120080D. 10.1117/12.2609643.10.1117/12.2609643 ↗
31. 10.1002/cvde.20039000510.1002/cvde.200390005 ↗
32. 10.1116/6.000058910.1116/6.0000589 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0362710.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03627 ↗
34. 10.3390/ma912100710.3390/ma9121007 ↗
35. 10.1039/D0CP05428C10.1039/D0CP05428C ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.8b0519210.1021/jacs.8b05192 ↗
37. 10.29317/ejpfm.201903020910.29317/ejpfm.2019030209 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0025410.1021/acs.macromol.0c00254 ↗
39. 10.1039/D0NA00254B10.1039/D0NA00254B ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.12.01310.1016/j.ssi.2012.12.013 ↗
41. IR Spectrum Table & Chart; Merck, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/FI/en/technical-documents/technical-article/analytical-chemistry/photometry-and-reflectometry/ir-spectrum-table.
42. 10.1116/1.490394110.1116/1.4903941 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0300710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03007 ↗
44. Puurunen, R. L.; Gao, F. Influence of ALD Temperature on Thin Film Conformality: Investigation with Microscopic Lateral High-Aspect-Ratio Structures. Proceedings of the 2016 14th International Baltic Conference on Atomic Layer Deposition; BALD, 2017; pp 20–24.10.1109/BALD.2016.7886526 ↗
45. 10.1116/1.509362010.1116/1.5093620 ↗
46. 10.1039/D1CP04758B10.1039/D1CP04758B ↗
47. 10.1149/1.183744310.1149/1.1837443 ↗
48. 10.1002/pssb.20160042410.1002/pssb.201600424 ↗
49. 10.1149/1.307269410.1149/1.3072694 ↗