Recent trends in embedded 3D bioprinting of vascularized tissue constructs
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract 3D bioprinting technology offers significant advantages in the fabrication of tissue and organ structures by allowing precise layer-by-layer patterning of cells and various biomaterials. However, conventional bioinks exhibit poor mechanical properties, which limit their use in the fabrication of large-scale vascularized tissue constructs. To address these limitations, recent studies have focused on the development of rapidly crosslinkable bioinks through chemical modification. These enable rapid crosslinking within minutes, offering substantial advantages for engineering large-scale tissue constructs. Nevertheless, challenges remain in the production of constructs that fully incorporate the complex vascular networks inherent to native tissues. Recently, embedded bioprinting technique, which involves the direct writing of bioink into a support bath that provides physical support, has gained significant attention for enabling the freeform fabrication of 3D structures. This method has been extensively studied and offers the advantage of fabricating structures ranging from tissue constructs with simple vascular channels to complex structures containing multiscale vascular networks. This review presents an overview of the various materials utilized in embedded bioprinting and elucidates the rheological properties of these materials. Furthermore, it examines the current research trends in the biofabrication of vascularized tissue constructs using embedded bioprinting techniques, along with their associated limitations. The review concludes by proposing areas for future improvement, specifically addressing material and biofabrication approaches as well as bioprinting systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (97)
Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
2. Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for engineering tissue-and organ-specific microenvironments10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00808 ↗
3. Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl–based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms10.1038/nprot.2016.037 ↗
4. Visible light cross‐linking of gelatin hydrogels offers an enhanced cell microenvironment with improved light penetration depth10.1002/mabi.201900098 ↗
5. New visible-light photoinitiating system for improved print fidelity in gelatin-based bioinks10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00149 ↗
6. Tissue-specific gelatin bioink as a rheology modifier for high printability and adjustable tissue properties10.1039/D3BM02111D ↗
7. Facile bioprinting process for fabricating size‐controllable functional microtissues using light‐activated decellularized extracellular matrix‐based bioinks10.1002/admt.202100947 ↗
8. Light‐activated decellularized extracellular matrix‐based bioinks for volumetric tissue analogs at the centimeter scale10.1002/adfm.202011252 ↗
9. Coaxial cell printing of freestanding, perfusable, and functional in vitro vascular models for recapitulation of native vascular endothelium pathophysiology10.1002/adhm.201801102 ↗
10. Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels10.1126/sciadv.aaw2459 ↗
11. Embedding biomimetic vascular networks via coaxial sacrificial writing into functional tissue10.1002/adma.202401528 ↗
12. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks10.1002/adma.201004625 ↗
13. Stiffness of the aligned fibers affects structural and functional integrity of the oriented endothelial cells10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.022 ↗
14. Matrix stiffening promotes a tumor vasculature phenotype10.1073/pnas.1613855114 ↗
15. Embedded 3D bioprinting–an emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic & large vascularized tissue constructs10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.012 ↗
16. Engineered assistive materials for 3D bioprinting: support baths and sacrificial inks10.1088/1758-5090/ac6bbe ↗
17. Engineering densely packed adipose tissue via environmentally controlled in‐bath 3D bioprinting10.1002/adfm.202200203 ↗
18. Embedded bioprinting for designer 3D tissue constructs with complex structural organization10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.048 ↗
19. The rheology of direct and suspended extrusion bioprinting10.1063/5.0031475 ↗
20. A visual, in‐expensive, and wireless capillary rheometer for characterizing wholly‐cellular bioinks10.1002/smll.202304778 ↗
21. Chen · 2000 · vol 28
22. T. Instruments
23. Characterization of biocompatibility of functional bioinks for 3D bioprinting10.3390/bioengineering10040457 ↗
24. Toxic or not toxic? The specifications of the standard ISO 10993-5 are not explicit enough to yield comparable results in the cytotoxicity assessment of an identical medical device10.3389/fmedt.2023.1195529 ↗
25. Accuracy of three techniques to determine cell viability in 3D tissues or scaffolds10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0313 ↗
26. Soft hydrogel shapeability via supportive bath matching in embedded 3D printing10.1002/admt.202300001 ↗
27. Tissue-specific decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration and modeling using 3D bioprinting technology10.3390/ijms22157837 ↗
28. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart10.1126/science.aav9051 ↗
29. 3D printing in alginic acid bath of in-situ crosslinked collagen composite scaffolds10.3390/ma14216720 ↗
30. Construction of a novel in vitro atherosclerotic model from geometry‐tunable artery equivalents engineered via in‐bath coaxial cell printing10.1002/adfm.202008878 ↗
31. Writing in the granular gel medium10.1126/sciadv.1500655 ↗
32. Preparation and characterization of nanoclay-hydrogel composite support-bath for bioprinting of complex structures10.1038/s41598-020-61606-x ↗
33. Embedded 3D printing in self‐healing annealable composites for precise patterning of functionally mature human neural constructs10.1002/advs.202201392 ↗
34. Three-dimensional direct cell patterning in collagen hydrogels with near-infrared femtosecond laser10.1038/srep17203 ↗
35. FRESH™ 3D bioprinted cardiac tissue, a bioengineered platform for in vitro pharmacology10.1063/5.0163363 ↗
36. 3D bioprinted patient‐specific extracellular matrix scaffolds for soft tissue defects10.1002/adhm.202200866 ↗
37. Bioprinted 3D vascularized tissue model for drug toxicity analysis10.1063/1.4994708 ↗
38. Blood‐lymphatic integrated system with heterogeneous melanoma spheroids via in‐bath three‐dimensional bioprinting for modelling of combinational targeted therapy10.1002/advs.202202093 ↗
39. 3D bioprinted multilayered cerebrovascular conduits to study cancer extravasation mechanism related with vascular geometry10.1038/s41467-023-43586-4 ↗
40. Efficient myotube formation in 3D bioprinted tissue construct by biochemical and topographical cues10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119632 ↗
41. Aspiration-assisted freeform bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids within alginate microgels10.1088/1758-5090/ac4dd8 ↗
42. Complex 3D‐printed microchannels within cell‐degradable hydrogels10.1002/adfm.201801331 ↗
43. Granular gel support-enabled extrusion of three-dimensional alginate and cellular structures10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025016 ↗
44. Embedded multimaterial bioprinting platform for biofabrication of biomimetic vascular structures10.1557/s43578-021-00254-x ↗
45. Type I collagen and collagen mimetics as angiogenesis promoting superpolymers10.2174/138161207782794176 ↗
46. Effects of the mechanical properties of collagen gel on the in vitro formation of microvessel networks by endothelial cells10.1089/ten.2006.0333 ↗
47. An intestinal model with a finger-like villus structure fabricated using a bioprinting process and collagen/SIS-based cell-laden bioink10.7150/thno.41225 ↗
48. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels10.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
49. Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of vascularized tissues10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109398 ↗
50. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo pre-vascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.040 ↗
51. Kidney decellularized extracellular matrix enhanced the vascularization and maturation of human kidney organoids10.1002/advs.202103526 ↗
52. Extracellular‐matrix‐reinforced bioinks for 3D bioprinting human tissue10.1002/adma.202005476 ↗
53. Tissue engineered bio‐blood‐vessels constructed using a tissue‐specific bioink and 3D coaxial cell printing technique: a novel therapy for ischemic disease10.1002/adfm.201700798 ↗
54. Guiding morphogenesis in cell-instructive microgels for therapeutic angiogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.051 ↗
55. Release from alginate enhances the biological activity of vascular endothelial growth factor10.1163/156856298X00389 ↗
56. Sodium alginate hydrogel containing platelet-rich plasma for wound healing10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113096 ↗
57. Hyaluronan and human endothelial cell behavior10.1080/03008200802148462 ↗
58. Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels10.1002/adma.201501234 ↗
59. Dynamic coordination chemistry enables free directional printing of biopolymer hydrogel10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00128 ↗
60. Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication10.1063/5.0032777 ↗
61. Vinchhi · 2021 · 395
62. Effects of ionic crosslinking on physical and mechanical properties of alginate mulching films10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.034 ↗
63. Extrusion bioprinting: recent progress, challenges, and future opportunities10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116 ↗
64. Three-dimensional bioprinting of complex cell laden alginate hydrogel structures10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045012 ↗
65. Kesari · 2005 · vol 845 · p 111
66. Tissue-engineering of vascular grafts containing endothelium and smooth-muscle using triple-coaxial cell printing10.1063/1.5099306 ↗
67. Effects of pH on the shape of alginate particles and its release behavior10.1155/2017/3902704 ↗
68. Multicellular vascularized engineered tissues through user‐programmable biomaterial photodegradation10.1002/adma.201703156 ↗
69. Biophysical and biomolecular interactions of malaria-infected erythrocytes in engineered human capillaries10.1126/sciadv.aay7243 ↗
70. Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042 ↗
71. Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels10.1126/science.aav9750 ↗
72. Visible light-induced 3D bioprinting technologies and corresponding bioink materials for tissue engineering: a review10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.021 ↗
73. Crosslinking strategies for 3D bioprinting of polymeric hydrogels10.1002/smll.202002931 ↗
74. Research progress in enzymatically cross-linked hydrogels as injectable systems for bioprinting and tissue engineering10.3390/gels9030230 ↗
75. Fast setting silk fibroin bioink for bioprinting of patient‐specific memory‐shape implants10.1002/adhm.201701021 ↗
76. Gellan fluid gel as a versatile support bath material for fluid extrusion bioprinting10.1021/acsami.8b13792 ↗
77. Cross-linkable microgel composite matrix bath for embedded bioprinting of perfusable tissue constructs and sculpting of solid objects10.1021/acsami.9b15451 ↗
78. Liquid-embedded (bio) printing of alginate-free, standalone, ultrafine, and ultrathin-walled cannular structures10.1073/pnas.2206762120 ↗
79. Construction of tissue‐level cancer‐vascular model with high‐precision position control via in situ 3D cell printing10.1002/smtd.202100072 ↗
80. Click chemistry-based injectable hydrogels and bioprinting inks for tissue engineering applications10.1007/s13770-018-0152-8 ↗
81. Click chemistry for 3D bioprinting10.1039/D3MH00516J ↗
82. “Click” chemistry in polymeric scaffolds: bioactive materials for tissue engineering10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.023 ↗
83. Hydrogel bioink based on clickable cellulose derivatives: synthesis, characterization and in vitro assessment10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.068 ↗
84. Click chemistry hydrogels for extrusion bioprinting: progress, challenges, and opportunities10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01105 ↗
85. Glucose-sensitive self-healing hydrogel as sacrificial materials to fabricate vascularized constructs10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.008 ↗
86. Biodegradable self‐folding polymer films with controlled thermo‐triggered folding10.1002/adfm.201400176 ↗
87. 4D biofabrication using shape‐morphing hydrogels10.1002/adma.201703443 ↗
88. A biomimetic 3D‐self‐forming approach for microvascular scaffolds10.1002/advs.201903553 ↗
89. A preliminary study for an intraoperative 3D bioprinting treatment of severe burn injuries10.1097/GOX.0000000000004056 ↗
90. Robotic in situ 3D bio-printing technology for repairing large segmental bone defects10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.011 ↗
91. A multi-axis robot-based bioprinting system supporting natural cell function preservation and cardiac tissue fabrication10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.009 ↗
92. Vascular tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and clinical promise10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.009 ↗
93. Effective bioprinting resolution in tissue model fabrication10.1039/C8LC01037D ↗
94. Breaking the resolution limits of 3D bioprinting: future opportunities and present challenges10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.10.009 ↗
95. Applications, advancements, and challenges of 3D bioprinting in organ transplantation10.1039/D3BM01934A ↗
96. 3D engineering of diseased blood vessels for integrative in vitro–in silico mechanobiology study10.1088/1758-5090/ad8034 ↗
97. AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: from bench to bedside10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.021 ↗