Principle-based multiphysics simulation for 3D bioprinting systems: modelling inkjet, extrusion, and DLP processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Among additive manufacturing (AM), 3D inkjet technology, materials extrusion (ME), and digital light processing (DLP), which are from dot and line to face printing, have been extensively investigated for biological and pharmaceutical applications. These techniques are valued for their ability to create customised, complex, drug-laden devices and tissue engineering scaffolds. However, testing new bioinks or filament designs can be both expensive and time-consuming. To this end, numerical simulation offers a useful solution by reducing costs and saving time. Both machine learning (ML) and theory-based models can be used for simulation. ML excels in handling complex data but faces challenges with data availability and overfitting, while theory-based models provide a more interpretable and data-efficient framework. This review explores how theory-based numerical simulation can be used to assess and optimise factors such as bioink printability, technique mechanism, printing parameters, and post-printing outcomes. By using simulation, key parameters can be understood and optimised without performing extensive physical experiments. The review highlights current models and discusses opportunities and challenges in using simulations to enhance the AM process, potentially advancing regenerative medicine and personalised treatments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Sydney
Sydney Nano Institute, University of Sydney
Inha University
State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Medical School, Nanjing University
Florida Institute of Technology
Funding
University of Sydney · Ministry of Science and Technology Information and Communication · National Research Foundation of Korea · Biomanufacturing Incubator in The University of Sydney
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Scaffold-free: a developing technique in field of tissue engineering10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105148 ↗
2. Recent progress in three-dimensionally-printed dosage forms from a pharmacist perspective10.1093/jpp/rgab168 ↗
3. The additive manufacturing approach to polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic devices: review and future directions10.3390/polym15081926 ↗
4. Hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies10.1002/adma.201902026 ↗
5. Binder jet 3D printing—process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707 ↗
6. 3D-printed multifunctional materials enabled by artificial-intelligence-assisted fabrication technologies10.1038/s41578-020-00235-2 ↗
7. Fabrication of hollow lattice alumina ceramic with good mechanical properties by digital light processing 3D printing technology10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.065 ↗
8. Co-continuous calcium phosphate/polycaprolactone composite bone scaffolds fabricated by digital light processing and polymer melt suction10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.093 ↗
9. Characterization and prediction of the nonlinear creep behavior of 3D-printed polyurethane acrylate10.1016/j.addma.2021.102583 ↗
10. Dynamic crushing of tailored honeycombs realized via additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107126 ↗
11. Sequentially suspended 3D bioprinting of multiple-layered vascular models with tunable geometries forin vitromodeling of arterial disorders initiation10.1088/1758-5090/aceffa ↗
12. Arraycount, an algorithm for automatic cell counting in microwell arrays10.2144/000113202 ↗
13. Cell confinement in patterned nanoliter droplets in a microwell array by wiping10.1002/jbm.a.32557 ↗
14. Controlled release of vancomycin from PEGylated fibrinogen polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogel10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213896 ↗
15. Cellular particle dynamics simulation of biomechanical relaxation processes of multi-cellular systems
16. Thermal-error modeling for complex physical systems: the-state-of-arts review10.1007/s00170-008-1570-x ↗
17. spatiotemporally controlled photoresponsive hydrogels: design and predictive modeling from processing through application10.1002/adfm.202000639 ↗
18. Role of computer simulation to predict the outcome of 3D bioprinting10.2217/3dp-2016-0008 ↗
19. A review on machine learning in 3D printing: applications, potential, and challenges10.1007/s10462-020-09876-9 ↗
20. Machine learning for advanced additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.023 ↗
21. Harnessing artificial intelligence for the next generation of 3D printed medicines10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.015 ↗
22. Compensating the cell-induced light scattering effect in light-based bioprinting using deep learning10.1088/1758-5090/ac3b92 ↗
23. Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691 ↗
24. Enhancing quality control in bioprinting through machine learning10.1088/1758-5090/ad2189 ↗
25. Progress and opportunities for machine learning in materials and processes of additive manufacturing10.1002/adma.202310006 ↗
26. Physics of Bioprinting10.1063/1.5087206 ↗
27. Utilizing bioprinting to engineer spatially organized tissues from the bottom-up10.1186/s13287-024-03712-5 ↗
28. 3D bioprinting: a novel avenue for manufacturing tissues and organs10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.009 ↗
29. Classifications and applications of inkjet printing technology: a review10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119219 ↗
30. Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003 ↗
31. Ink material selection and optical design considerations in DLP 3D printing10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101721 ↗
32. Evaluating inkjet printability of viscoelastic ink through Deborah number analysis10.1063/5.0253639 ↗
33. Fundamental fluid dynamics challenges in inkjet printing10.1146/annurev-fluid-022321-114001 ↗
34. Hydrodynamic response model of a piezoelectric inkjet print-head10.1016/j.sna.2018.11.001 ↗
35. Multi-physical field control piezoelectric inkjet bioprinting for 3D tissue-like structure manufacturing10.36922/ijb.2120 ↗
36. Numerical simulation of micro droplet formation combined with pneumatic and piezoelectric drive10.1007/s00542-018-4237-z ↗
37. Lattice Boltzmann multicomponent model for direct-writing printing10.1063/5.0046555 ↗
38. Mechanical performance of wall structures in 3D printing processes: theory, design tools and experiments10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.010 ↗
39. A method to predict the ultimate tensile strength of 3D printing polylactic acid (PLA) materials with different printing orientations10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.025 ↗
40. 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts10.1002/advs.201900344 ↗
41. Controlled growth factor release in 3D-printed hydrogels10.1002/adhm.201900977 ↗
42. Design and optimization of a high temperature microheater for inkjet deposition10.1007/s00170-016-8440-8 ↗
43. Photopolymerizable biomaterials and light-based 3D printing strategies for biomedical applications10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00810 ↗
44. Beer–Lambert law in photochemistry: a new approach10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114086 ↗
45. Beer–Lambert law for optical tissue diagnostics: current state of the art and the main limitations10.1117/1.JBO.26.10.100901 ↗
46. Smoothed finite element methods (S-FEM): an overview and recent developments10.1007/s11831-016-9202-3 ↗
47. Finite element analysis of thermoplastic polymer extrusion 3D printed material for mechanical property prediction10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.009 ↗
48. Prediction of mechanical behavior of 3D bioprinted tissue-engineered scaffolds using finite element method (FEM) analysis10.1016/j.addma.2020.101181 ↗
49. Computational study of heat transfer enhancement using porous foams with phase change materials: a comparative review10.1016/j.rser.2023.113196 ↗
50. Lattice Boltzmann methods for combustion applications10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101140 ↗
51. Progress and future directions bridging microplastics transport from pore to continuum scale: a comprehensive review for experimental and modeling approaches10.1016/j.trac.2024.117851 ↗
52. Current research progress of photopolymerized hydrogels in tissue engineering10.1016/j.cclet.2021.01.048 ↗
53. Fundamentals and applications of photo-cross-linking in bioprinting10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00812 ↗
54. High-fidelity and high-efficiency additive manufacturing using tunable pre-curing digital light processing10.1016/j.addma.2019.100889 ↗
55. Modern Monte Carlo methods for efficient uncertainty quantification and propagation: a survey10.1002/wics.1539 ↗
56. Dynamic Monte Carlo simulations of strain-induced crystallization in multiblock copolymers: effects of microphase separation10.1016/j.polymer.2022.125512 ↗
57. High cell density and high-resolution 3D bioprinting for fabricating vascularized tissues10.1126/sciadv.ade7923 ↗
58. Inkjet printing of viscous monodisperse microdroplets by laser-induced flow focusing10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.024003 ↗
59. Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502 ↗
60. Engineering considerations on extrusion-based bioprinting: interactions of material behavior, mechanical forces and cells in the printing needle10.1088/1758-5090/ab7553 ↗
61. High-throughput characterization of fluid properties to predict droplet ejection for three-dimensional inkjet printing formulations10.1016/j.addma.2019.100792 ↗
62. Predicting nanoparticle suspension viscoelasticity for multimaterial 3D printing of silica–titania glass10.1021/acsanm.8b00821 ↗
63. A tunable extruded 3D printing platform using thermo-sensitive pastes10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119360 ↗
64. A comprehensive study on the droplet formation processes and its influencing factors of a tubular piezoelectric print head10.1080/01694243.2019.1699286 ↗
65. Bioink temperature influence on shear stress, pressure and velocity using computational simulation10.3390/pr8070865 ↗
66. Modeling the flow behavior and flow rate of medium viscosity alginate for scaffold fabrication with a three-dimensional bioplotter10.1115/1.4036226 ↗
67. Printing quality improvement for laser-induced forward transfer bioprinting: numerical modeling and experimental validation10.1063/5.0054675 ↗
68. Hybrid analytical/numerical modeling of nanosecond laser-induced micro-jets generated by liquid confining devices10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.103079 ↗
69. Study on linear bio-structure print process based on alginate bio-ink in 3D bio-fabrication10.1007/s42242-020-00065-9 ↗
70. Prediction of a flying droplet landing over a non-flat substrates for ink-jet applications10.1007/s12008-019-00547-w ↗
71. Sacrificial scaffold-assisted direct ink writing of engineered aortic valve prostheses10.1088/1758-5090/aceffb ↗
72. Paracetamol extended release FDM 3D printlets: evaluation of formulation variables on printability and drug release10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120053 ↗
73. Computational fluid dynamics assessment of the effect of bioprinting parameters in extrusion bioprinting10.18063/ijb.v8i2.545 ↗
74. Computational simulation-based comparative analysis of standard 3D printing and conical nozzles for pneumatic and piston-driven bioprinting10.18063/ijb.730 ↗
75. Experimental and numerical investigation of the extrusion and deposition process of a poly(lactic acid) strand with fused deposition modeling10.3390/polym12122885 ↗
76. Corner accuracy in direct ink writing with support material10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00086 ↗
77. Printing direction dependent microstructures in direct ink writing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101192 ↗
78. 3D bioprinting-tunable small-diameter blood vessels with biomimetic biphasic cell layers10.1021/acsami.0c14871 ↗
79. Rheology, simulation and data analysis toward bioprinting cell viability awareness10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00119 ↗
80. Coaxial 3D bioprinting process research and performance tests on vascular scaffolds10.3390/mi15040463 ↗
81. Shape fidelity evaluation of alginate-based hydrogels through extrusion-based bioprinting10.3390/jfb13040225 ↗
82. A three-dimensional model for analysis and control of phase change phenomena during 3D printing of biological tissue10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00077 ↗
83. Prediction of temperature and crystal growth evolution during 3D printing of polymeric materials via extrusion10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109121 ↗
84. Prediction of part distortion in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) of semi-crystalline polymers via COMSOL: effect of printing conditions10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.04.012 ↗
85. Physico-mechanical and finite element analysis evaluation of 3D printable alginate-methylcellulose inks for wound healing applications10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116666 ↗
86. Understanding the relationship between slicing and measured fill density in material extrusion 3D printing towards precision porosity constructs for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications10.1186/s41205-020-00063-8 ↗
87. Design of FDM 3D printed polymers: an experimental-modelling methodology for the prediction of mechanical properties10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108414 ↗
88. Prediction of in-plane stiffness of multi-material 3D printed laminate parts fabricated by FDM process using CLT and its mechanical behaviour under tensile load10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100955 ↗
89. 3D-printed gastroretentive sustained release drug delivery system by applying design of experiment approach10.3390/molecules25102330 ↗
90. 3D printing of modified-release aminosalicylate (4-ASA and 5-ASA) tablets10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.003 ↗
91. Fused-filament 3D printing (3DP) for fabrication of tablets10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.044 ↗
92. Development of a quantitative method to evaluate the printability of filaments for fused deposition modeling 3D printing10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119760 ↗
93. Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks10.1088/1758-5090/aac872 ↗
94. Changes in filament microstructures during direct ink writing with a yield stress fluid support10.1021/acsapm.0c00126 ↗
95. In-process monitoring of part geometry in fused filament fabrication using computer vision and digital twins10.1016/j.addma.2020.101609 ↗
96. Mitigating 3D printing defects via cyber-physical systems: a process for fabricating defect-free components10.1007/s00170-025-16100-x ↗
97. Design and 3D printing of personalized hybrid and gradient structures for critical size bone defects10.1021/acsabm.3c00107 ↗
98. Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ac5220 ↗
99. A new computational method of modeling and evaluation of dissolving microneedle for drug delivery applications: extension to theoretical modeling of a novel design of microneedle (array in array) for efficient drug delivery10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105339 ↗
100. Theoretical prediction and experimental validation of the digital light processing (DLP) working curve for photocurable materials10.1016/j.addma.2020.101716 ↗