Enhanced corrosion performance of low‐cost titanium alloys in a simulated diabetic environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Due to their excellent biocompatibility, titanium alloys are the preferred materials for manufacturing bioimplants. Low‐cost titanium alloys have been developed as cheaper and less toxic alternatives for Ti–6Al–4V in the biomedical industry, but their suitability for diabetes patients is yet to be evaluated. With the growing number of diabetes patients globally, this research investigated the corrosion performance of low‐cost Ti–3Fe, Ti–4.5Al–1V–3Fe, and Ti–6Al–1V–3Fe alloys in 0.9 wt.% sodium chloride solution and glucose‐containing Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) compared with Ti–6Al–4V. Glucose was added to simulate the body fluids of patients with prediabetic and diabetic conditions. Open circuit potential and potentiodynamic polarization tests were performed. The results reveal that Ti–4.5Al–1V–3Fe and Ti–6Al–1V–3Fe alloys show superior corrosion resistance compared with the other alloys in the glucose‐containing solutions, as they had the lowest corrosion rate and higher corrosion potential. Consequently, these alloys hold promise as effective implants, particularly for people living with diabetes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
Department of Science and Technology‐National Research Foundation (DST‐NRF) Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
African Materials Science and Engineering Network (AMSEN) Johannesburg South Africa
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Federal University of Technology Akure Akure Ondo State Nigeria
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed Y. M. · Int. J. Sci Res. · 2014 · 3 · 1351
2. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
3. Pandey A. · Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2020 · 6 · 405
4. 10.1002/maco.20170970910.1002/maco.201709709 ↗
5. 10.3390/min1112142510.3390/min11121425 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12598-021-01796-z10.1007/s12598-021-01796-z ↗
7. 10.1177/095440622096769410.1177/0954406220967694 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.03710.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.037 ↗
9. International Diabetes Federation International Diabetes Altlas 10th edition 2021 11.https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition
10. 10.1111/jch.1383110.1111/jch.13831 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.500819410.1063/1.5008194 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11837-004-0144-010.1007/s11837-004-0144-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.03910.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.039 ↗
14. 10.3390/met807050610.3390/met8070506 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.06.00210.1016/j.msec.2013.06.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.wear.2020.20355110.1016/j.wear.2020.203551 ↗
17. Fujii H. · Nippon Steel Tech. Rep. · 2002 · 85 · 107
18. Nochovnaya N. A. · Meter. Sci. · 2008 · 44 · 396
19. Fujii H. · Nippon Steel Tech. Rep. · 2002 · 85 · 113
20. 10.2174/187761080100201004010.2174/1877610801002010040 ↗
21. F.Yu Ph.D Thesis University of Birmingham 2015.
22. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11682310.1016/j.molliq.2021.116823 ↗
23. ANSI. ASTM G59‐972020.https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/astm/astmg59972020(accessed May 2023).
24. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3942-4_210.1007/978-1-4614-3942-4_2 ↗
25. 10.1166/jbt.2015.136110.1166/jbt.2015.1361 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.01.03810.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.01.038 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.10.02110.1016/j.msec.2010.10.021 ↗
28. 10.1002/maco.20221307610.1002/maco.202213076 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
30. 10.1515/corrrev-2019-002910.1515/corrrev-2019-0029 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.05210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.052 ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.82006030410.1002/jbm.820060304 ↗
33. Fujii H. · Nippon Steel Tech. Rep. · 2014 · 396 · 16
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.01010.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.010 ↗
35. Bhola R. · Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs · 2011 · 25 · 34
36. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.02710.1016/j.msea.2004.02.027 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.07.02410.1016/j.electacta.2005.07.024 ↗
38. 10.1557/opl.2012.147010.1557/opl.2012.1470 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma911087410.3390/ma9110874 ↗
40. 10.1371/journal.pone.009337710.1371/journal.pone.0093377 ↗