Design for lifecycle robustness of fastening systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The future requirements on faster and automated construction, improved life‐cycle performance and sustainability of infrastructure in general increasingly promote the use of fastening technology. This paper addresses the concept of lifecycle robustness by introducing an ensemble of technical and management measures, covering the entire life span from design, construction, operation and decommissioning. Although a significant research on robustness and performance indicators has been performed in related areas, such as bridges or nuclear power plants, a framework for the quantification of lifecycle robustness of fastening systems is still not available. The presented proposals are based on the synthesis of theoretical and technological progress, established engineering design approaches and communication procedures, and experimental evidence, all originating from in‐house research and industrial partners. Rather than discussing particular technical aspects, this paper focuses on the uncertainty management and hazard mitigation policies through the entire life span of the fastening systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Life Cycle Costing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Brno University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering Brno
University BOKU, Vienna Christian Doppler Laboratory Peter‐Jordan‐Straße 82 1190 Wien
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1201/b17073-710.1201/b17073-7 ↗
2. 10.1002/pse.18010.1002/pse.180 ↗
3. 10.1002/suco.20130000210.1002/suco.201300002 ↗
4. Wendner R. · 2015
5. Wendner R. · 2014
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
7. Cusatis G. · 201310.1002/9781118622612.ch17 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1008091710.3390/ma10080917 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1105071110.3390/ma11050711 ↗
10. J. Podroužek J. Vorel R. Wan‐Wendner 2017
11. 10.1061/9780784413111.05110.1061/9780784413111.051 ↗
12. 10.14359/5168745310.14359/51687453 ↗
13. 10.1201/9781315375175-14110.1201/9781315375175-141 ↗
14. Abrishami H.;Tcherner J.;Barre F.;Borgerhoff M.;Bumann U.;Calonius K.;Courtois A.;Debattista J.‐M.; u. a.:Bonded or Unbonded Technologies for Nuclear Reactor Prestressed Concrete Containments: Organisation for Economic Co‐Operation and Development 2015.
15. Biondini F. · 2009 · 1
16. 10.1061/41016(314)23510.1061/41016(314)235 ↗
17. 10.1201/b1235210.1201/b12352 ↗
18. EOTA: E.TAG 001‐5 Metal Anchors for use in Concrete Bonded Anchors.Brussels:European Organisation for Technical Approvals 2008.
19. NTSB: Highway accident report: ceiling collapse in the Interstate 90 connector tunnel at Boston Massachusetts July 10 2006 Highway Accident Report.Washington USA:National Transportation Safety Board 2007.
20. Kawahara S. · 2014
21. Uncertainty analysis of the power law extrapolation techniques for adhesive anchors
22. Robust power law extrapolation for adhesive anchors under sustained load
23. 10.1002/best.20110000310.1002/best.201100003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.07610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.076 ↗
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.109010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.1090 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.010 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.08.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.08.005 ↗