journal article·2012-03-13Open access

Modeling noncontact atomic force microscopy resolution on corrugated surfaces

Kristen M Burson, Mahito Yamamoto, William G Cullen

Abstract

Key developments in NC-AFM have generally involved atomically flat crystalline surfaces. However, many surfaces of technological interest are not atomically flat. We discuss the experimental difficulties in obtaining high-resolution images of rough surfaces, with amorphous SiO2 as a specific case. We develop a quasi-1-D minimal model for noncontact atomic force microscopy, based on van der Waals interactions between a spherical tip and the surface, explicitly accounting for the corrugated substrate (modeled as a sinusoid). The model results show an attenuation of the topographic contours by ~30% for tip distances within 5 Å of the surface. Results also indicate a deviation from the Hamaker force law for a sphere interacting with a flat surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.02611110.1103/PhysRevE.74.026111 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11249-006-9172-y10.1007/s11249-006-9172-y ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.20541110.1103/PhysRevB.79.205411 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.07610210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.076102 ↗
5. 10.1021/nl070613a10.1021/nl070613a ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.070333710410.1073/pnas.0703337104 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphys136510.1038/nphys1365 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0554510.1038/nature05545 ↗
10. 10.1051/jphys:01987004807010850010.1051/jphys:019870048070108500 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.343764210.1063/1.3437642 ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/7/07530310.1088/0022-3727/43/7/075303 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.02160310.1103/PhysRevE.78.021603 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.21550410.1103/PhysRevLett.105.215504 ↗
15. 10.1038/nnano.2011.12310.1038/nnano.2011.123 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.118416710.1126/science.1184167 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00339005131410.1007/s003390051314 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.01.02210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.01.022 ↗
19. Burson · 2012
20. 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.94910.1103/RevModPhys.75.949 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.264210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2642 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00544-310.1016/S0169-4332(98)00544-3 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1083510.1103/PhysRevB.58.10835 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.696710.1103/PhysRevB.62.6967 ↗
25. Israelachvili · 2011
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1267810.1103/PhysRevB.61.12678 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.105782410.1126/science.1057824 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.133554610.1063/1.1335546 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.08141510.1103/PhysRevB.83.081415 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.susc.2008.12.02010.1016/j.susc.2008.12.020 ↗