Influence of the magnetic nanoparticle coating on the magnetic relaxation time
Source abstract
Abstract
Colloidal systems consisting of monodomain superparamagnetic nanoparticles have been used in biomedical applications, such as the hyperthermia treatment for cancer. In this type of colloid, called a nanofluid, the nanoparticles tend to agglomeration. It has been shown experimentally that the nanoparticle coating plays an important role in the nanoparticle dispersion stability and biocompatibility. However, theoretical studies in this field are lacking. In addition, the ways in which the nanoparticle coating influences the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles are not yet understood. In order to fill in this gap, this study presents a numerical simulation model that elucidates how the nanoparticle coating affects the nanoparticle agglomeration tendency as well as the effective magnetic relaxation time of the system. To simulate the self-organization of the colloidal nanoparticles, a stochastic Langevin dynamics method was applied based on the effective Verlet-type algorithm. The Néel magnetic relaxation time was obtained via the Coffey method in an oblique magnetic field, adapted to the local magnetic field on a nanoparticle.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.15406/mojbm.2017.02.0003810.15406/mojbm.2017.02.00038 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-017-18162-810.1038/s41598-017-18162-8 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11060-010-0389-010.1007/s11060-010-0389-0 ↗
4. 10.3109/0265673100374574010.3109/02656731003745740 ↗
5. Kandpal · Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research · 2014 · 73 · 87
6. 10.3390/ma1217266310.3390/ma12172663 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13538-018-0616-210.1007/s13538-018-0616-2 ↗
8. 10.1088/1757-899x/334/1/01204210.1088/1757-899x/334/1/012042 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn305719y10.1021/nn305719y ↗
10. 10.1063/1.271311210.1063/1.2713112 ↗
11. 10.1002/ejic.20150030310.1002/ejic.201500303 ↗
12. 10.1142/s233954781450019810.1142/s2339547814500198 ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/45/45200110.1088/0957-4484/25/45/452001 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.497453210.1063/1.4974532 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1001001010.3390/polym10010010 ↗
16. 10.1080/02656736.2018.153680910.1080/02656736.2018.1536809 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.043 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.11610.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.116 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10404-017-1856-010.1007/s10404-017-1856-0 ↗
20. 10.1080/00268976.2012.76005510.1080/00268976.2012.760055 ↗
21. 10.3762/bjnano.6.22310.3762/bjnano.6.223 ↗
22. 10.1103/physrevb.52.1595110.1103/physrevb.52.15951 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.01610.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.016 ↗
24. Coffey · 1992
25. 10.1088/1757-899x/106/1/01200410.1088/1757-899x/106/1/012004 ↗
26. 10.1021/cr068445e10.1021/cr068445e ↗
27. 10.1021/la200772e10.1021/la200772e ↗
28. 10.1103/physrev.130.167710.1103/physrev.130.1677 ↗
29. 10.1002/aic.1041310.1002/aic.10413 ↗
30. 10.1016/s0304-8853(97)01165-710.1016/s0304-8853(97)01165-7 ↗
31. 10.1109/20.28083410.1109/20.280834 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevlett.72.327810.1103/physrevlett.72.3278 ↗
33. Jiang · 1996 · 524
34. 10.1088/0022-3719/21/10/01910.1088/0022-3719/21/10/019 ↗
35. 10.1016/s0304-8853(97)01123-210.1016/s0304-8853(97)01123-2 ↗
36. 10.1007/s12274-018-2198-210.1007/s12274-018-2198-2 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-981-13-8954-2_210.1007/978-981-13-8954-2_2 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0057910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00579 ↗
39. 10.1103/physreve.98.03261010.1103/physreve.98.032610 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.508034810.1063/1.5080348 ↗
41. 10.3762/bjnano.10.2910.3762/bjnano.10.29 ↗