journal article·2014-10-21Open access

Printing Stable Liquid Tracks on a Surface with Finite Receding Contact Angle

Wen-Kai Hsiao, Graham D. Martin, Ian M. Hutchings

Langmuir· Volume 30· Issue 41

Abstract

We have used high-speed imaging to study the formation of liquid tracks on a surface with nonzero receding contact angle, by the sequential deposition of liquid drops. For small drop spacing we found good agreement with the track morphology predicted by an existing line stability model. In addition, we confirmed definitively the preferential drop-to-bead fluid flow and the predicted drop spreading variation in the scalloped line and paired bead formation regimes. However, we found that without accounting for drop impact inertia, the model underestimated the maximum drop spreading radii and, hence, the instantaneous track width. In addition, the printed track became stable at larger drop spacing, in contrast to the expected behavior. We believe that the destabilizing effect of a receding contact line may be minimized when track radii, as predicted by volume conservation and drop-bead coalescence dynamics, converge as the drop spacing increases. An increase in viscous dissipation and a reduction of the capillary-driven flow may be the additional stabilization mechanisms. The latter may also be responsible for achieving a stable and symmetrical track when printing with a shorter interval (higher print frequency) at a given drop spacing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, IfM, University of Cambridge, 17 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Davis S. H. · J. Fluid Mech. · 1980 · 98 · 22510.1017/S0022112080000110 ↗
2. Schiaffino S. · J. Fluid Mech. · 1997 · 343 · 9510.1017/S0022112097005831 ↗
3. Duineveld P. C. · J. Fluid Mech. · 2003 · 477 · 17510.1017/S0022112002003117 ↗
4. Stringer J. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1036510.1021/la101296e ↗
5. Soltman D. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 222410.1021/la7026847 ↗
6. Ubal S. · Phys. Fluids · 2014 · 26 · 3210610.1063/1.4868039 ↗
7. Deegan R. D. · Nature · 1997 · 389 · 82710.1038/39827 ↗
8. Sommer A.P. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2005 · 5 · 55110.1021/cg0496989 ↗
9. Moffat J. R. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 886010.1021/jp902062z ↗
10. Soltman D. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1568610.1021/la102053j ↗
11. Hongki K. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1156810.1021/la100822s ↗
12. Soltman D. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2013 · 400 · 13510.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.006 ↗
13. Hsiao W.-K. · J. Imaging Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 53 · 050304
14. Rioboo R. · Exp. Fluids · 2002 · 33 · 11210.1007/s00348-002-0431-x ↗
15. Dong H. · AlChE J. · 2007 · 53 · 260610.1002/aic.11283 ↗
16. Jung S. J. · Soft Matter · 2012 · 8 · 268610.1039/c2sm06565g ↗
17. Van Dam D. B. · Phys. Fluids · 2004 · 16 · 340310.1063/1.1773551 ↗
18. Bourgès-Monnier C. · Langmuir · 1995 · 11 · 282010.1021/la00007a076 ↗
19. Dussan E. B. · Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 1979 · 11 · 37110.1146/annurev.fl.11.010179.002103 ↗
20. Otsu N. · IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. · 1979 · 9 · 6210.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗