journal article·1999-02-01

Fabrication and Characterization of Single Pores for Modeling Mass Transport across Porous Membranes

Li Sun, Richard M. Crooks

Langmuir· Volume 15· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

An Au membrane containing a single pore was fabricated using a template approach. The pore diameter is defined by the diameter of a glass fiber template and the pore length by the amount of Au electroplated over a seed pore. The utility of the single pore for modeling mass transport is demonstrated by configuring the pore as a Coulter counter to monitor the transport of 440 nm diameter polystyrene spheres. An important advantage of this Au membrane model is that the pore surface chemistry can be modified with a self-assembled monolayer. However, the metallic Au surface also requires minimizing the exposed membrane area in order to reduce the interfering charging/faradaic current and to shorten the instrumental response time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, P.O. Box 30012, College Station, Texas 77842

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Buttersack C. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 310610.1021/la950727e ↗
2. Giddings J. C. · 1991
3. Hoyt A. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 8673
4. Bustamante J. O. · Mol. Membr. Biol. · 1994 · 11 · 15010.3109/09687689409162232 ↗
5. Wen L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 119 · 7733
6. Shea K. J. · Macromolecules · 1990 · 23 · 4507
7. Perfluorinated Ionomer Membranes; Eisenberg, A., Yeager, H. L., Eds.; ACS Sym. Ser. 180; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1982.
8. De Vidts P. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · 135310.1149/1.1837595 ↗
9. Wang X.-L. · J. Membr. Sci. · 1995 · 103 · 133
10. Davis H. T. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1975 · 58 · 45210.1111/j.1151-2916.1975.tb19021.x ↗
11. Conner M. D. · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 239710.1021/la00033a022 ↗
12. Nishizawa M. · Science · 1995 · 268 · 70210.1126/science.268.5211.700 ↗
13. Hulteen J. C. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 660410.1021/ja980045o ↗
14. Masuda H. · Science · 1995 · 268 · 146810.1126/science.268.5216.1466 ↗
15. Fang Y. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 6073
16. Miller C. J. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1988 · 92 · 1936
17. Kemery P. J. · Langmuir · 1998 · 14 · 288910.1021/la980147s ↗
18. Schönenberger C. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1997 · 101 · 550510.1021/jp963938g ↗
19. Bath B. D. · Anal. Chem. · 1998 · 70 · 1058
20. Lines R. · 1992
21. Stoller A. I. · RCA Rev. · 1970 · 271 · 275
22. At
23. Bard A. J. · 1980
24. DeBlois R. W. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1970 · 41 · 91610.1063/1.1684724 ↗
25. 1989
26. Frederick, A.Electroplating; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1978.
27. The equation,t=l2/D, can be used to estimate the diffusional transient time, wherelis the pore length (6.5 μm) andD(1 × 10-8cm2/s) is the diffusion coefficient estimated from the Stokes−Einstein equation.
28. Kluijtmans S. G. J. M. · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 4987
29. Liu J. · Science · 1998 · 280 · 125610.1126/science.280.5367.1256 ↗
30. Wong S. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 604