Surface Coordination of Ruthenium Clusters on Platinum Nanoparticles for Methanol Oxidation Catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Inorganic surface modification was used to prepare Pt/Ru/Vulcan catalysts by coordinating a triruthenium cluster [ Ru 3 (CO) 9 (MeCN) 3 ] on Pt nanoparticles. The method was used to provided a surface with catalytic activity for use in the direct methanol fuel cell. The cluster adsorptive process followed a Langmuir adsorption isotherm. The amount of Ru could be controlled by changing the experimental conditions of adsorption. The catalyst powder was characterized by energy-dispersive spectrocopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction, and electrochemical studies. The proposed methodology provides a way to place Ru atoms on a Pt surface while avoiding metal segregation. The optimum results were obtained with a catalyst that presented a Ru/Pt ratio of 0.07, as given by XPS analysis. The peak current for methanol oxidation in cyclic voltammetry scans was similar to that of commercial true alloy catalysts. On the basis of these results, some considerations about how ruthenium segregation interferes with methanol oxidation are addressed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 23346, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3346, and Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, P.O. Box 23346, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3346
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Stoyanova A. · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 1991 · 29 · 119710.1023/A:1003482613323 ↗
2. Swider K. E. · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2000 · 3 · 410.1149/1.1390941 ↗
3. Richard F. · Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 335 · 36110.1016/0039-6028(95)00461-0 ↗
4. Schmidt T. J. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 92510.1149/1.1838368 ↗
5. Page T. · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2000 · 485 · 3410.1016/S0022-0728(00)00090-5 ↗
6. Kim H. · Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 474 · L20310.1016/S0039-6028(00)01055-4 ↗
7. Waszczuk P. · J. Catal. · 2001 · 203 · 110.1006/jcat.2001.3389 ↗
8. Crown A. · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 506 · L26810.1016/S0039-6028(02)01317-1 ↗
9. Friedch K. A. · NJ · 1996 · 96 · 119
10. Lee C. E. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 19310.1021/jp972415l ↗
11. Lee C. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 119 · 354310.1021/ja963163p ↗
12. Lee C. E. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 145 · 418210.1149/1.1838933 ↗
13. Aime S. · Inorg. Chim. Acta · 1995 · 235 · 35710.1016/0020-1693(95)90077-J ↗
14. Aricó A. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1996 · 143 · 395010.1149/1.1837321 ↗
15. Davies J. C. · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 496 · 11010.1016/S0039-6028(01)01562-X ↗
16. Herrero E. · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 494410.1021/la990219v ↗
17. Foulds G. A. · J. Organomet. Chem. · 1985 · 296 · 14710.1016/0022-328X(85)80345-4 ↗
18. Fachini E. R. · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 71710.1021/la980820d ↗
19. Natl. Bur. Stand. Circ. (U.S.) 539 · 1953 · 31
20. Koetz R. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1983 · 130 · 82510.1149/1.2119829 ↗