journal article·2001-11-01

Electrophoresis of DNA Adsorbed to a Cationic Supported Bilayer

David J. Olson, Joseph M. Johnson, Prateek D. Patel, Eric S. G. Shaqfeh, Steven G. Boxer, Gerald G. Fuller

Langmuir· Volume 17· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

We report fluorescence microscopy studies of the electrophoresis of individual DNA molecules electrostatically adsorbed to a cationic supported lipid bilayer. Obstacles to uniform electrophoretic flow cause the 2-D chains to adopt hooked conformations similar to those previously observed in 3-D electrophoresis experiments. Analysis of the stretch−contraction dynamics allows for an estimate of the obstacle density in the bilayer. Increasing the electric field causes the DNA molecules to become more highly stretched and increases the electrophoretic mobility substantially. A comparison of the Rouse relaxation time of the polymers and the average time between chain-obstacle collisions reveals that a single-obstacle model is insufficient to describe the observed dynamics but the obstacles are not dense enough to use a reptative model. Analysis of the unhooking dynamics reveals an 80% increase in hydrodynamic drag as compared to free chains. Finally, we observe anomalous diffusion of the DNA chains, with a large increase in the diffusion coefficient after the repeated application of high electric fields. Implications of the flow obstacles in the engineering of separation applications are discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Ferry J. D. · 1980
2. Bird R. B. · 1987
3. Larson R. G. · 1999
4. Perkins T. T. · Science · 1997 · 276 · 202110.1126/science.276.5321.2016 ↗
5. Smith D. E. · Science · 1998 · 281 · 134010.1126/science.281.5381.1340 ↗
6. Smith D. E. · Science · 1999 · 283 · 172710.1126/science.283.5408.1727 ↗
7. Doyle P. S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 4772
8. Smith S. B. · Science · 1992 · 258 · 112610.1126/science.1439819 ↗
9. Perkins T. T. · Science · 1995 · 268 · 8710.1126/science.7701345 ↗
10. Smith S. B. · Science · 1996 · 271 · 79910.1126/science.271.5250.799 ↗
11. Meiners J. C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 501710.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5014 ↗
12. Gurrieri S. · Biochemistry · 1990 · 29 · 340110.1021/bi00465a036 ↗
13. Oana H. · Macromolecules · 1994 · 27 · 606710.1021/ma00099a019 ↗
14. Schwinefus J. J. · Macromolecules · 1999 · 32 · 3684
15. Volkmuth W. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 212010.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2117 ↗
16. Duke T. A. J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 1555
17. Bakajin O. B. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 274010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2737 ↗
18. Doyle P. S. · 2001
19. Slater G. W. · Electrophoresis · 1998 · 19 · 154110.1002/elps.1150191003 ↗
20. Viovy J. L. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2000 · 72 · 87210.1103/RevModPhys.72.813 ↗
21. Maier B. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 191410.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1911 ↗
22. Maier B. · Macromolecules · 2000 · 33 · 719410.1021/ma000075n ↗
23. Babcock H. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 202110.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2018 ↗
24. Edwards D. A. · 1991
25. Fuller G. G. · Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1997 · 2 · 15710.1016/S1359-0294(97)80019-2 ↗
26. Olson D. J. · J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. · 2000 · 89 · 20710.1016/S0377-0257(99)00024-5 ↗
27. de Gennes P. G. · Science · 1997 · 276 · 199910.1126/science.276.5321.1999 ↗
28. Mayer L. D. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1986 · 858 · 168
29. MacDonald R. C. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1991 · 1061 · 303
30. Brian A. A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1984 · 81 · 616310.1073/pnas.81.19.6159 ↗
31. Akerman B. · Nucleic Acids Res. · 1996 · 24 · 109010.1093/nar/24.6.1080 ↗
32. Groves J. T. · Biophys. J. · 1995 · 69 · 197510.1016/S0006-3495(95)80067-6 ↗
33. Saville P. M. · Macromolecules · 1999 · 32 · 89910.1021/ma981049g ↗
34. Bruinsma R. · Europhys. Lett. · 1998 · 41 · 17010.1209/epl/i1998-00125-0 ↗
35. Menes R. · Europhys. Lett. · 1998 · 44 · 39810.1209/epl/i1998-00484-4 ↗
36. Netz R. R. · Macromolecules · 1999 · 32 · 9025
37. Sens P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 486510.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4862 ↗
38. Manning G. S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1968 · 51 · 92410.1063/1.1672157 ↗
39. Oosawa F. · Biopolymers · 1968 · 6 · 163310.1002/bip.1968.360061108 ↗
40. Sevick E. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 259810.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2595 ↗
41. Heller C. · Biopolymers · 1994 · 34 · 25910.1002/bip.360340211 ↗
42. Semenov A. N. · Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. · 1995 · 51 · 153710.1103/PhysRevE.51.1520 ↗
43. Saxton M. J. · Biophys. J. · 1994 · 66 · 40110.1016/S0006-3495(94)80789-1 ↗
44. Saxton M. J. · Biophys. J. · 1997 · 72 · 175310.1016/S0006-3495(97)78820-9 ↗
45. Hovis J. S. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 89710.1021/la991175t ↗
46. van Oudenaarden A. · Science · 1999 · 285 · 104810.1126/science.285.5430.1046 ↗
47. Chou C. F. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1999 · 96 · 13765