Comparison of the Aggregation Behavior of 15 Polymeric and Monomeric Dipeptide Surfactants in Aqueous Solution
Source abstract
Abstract
The aggregation numbers of 15 dipeptide surfactants were estimated by use of fluorescence steady-state quenching techniques. Polymerization of the surfactants with γ radiation resulted in molecular micelles with a lower number of repeat units than the corresponding monomer aggregation numbers at the concentration of monomer used for polymerization in this study. In addition, the aggregation numbers of the monomers decreased with increasing size of the N-terminal R group of the dipeptide surfactants examined in this study. The aggregation behavior of the dipeptide surfactants was further investigated using proton NMR ( 1 H NMR) spectroscopy. The proton resonances due to NH and Hα were measured above and below the critical micelle concentration of the surfactants. From the differences in proton chemical shifts of the monomeric dipeptide surfactants and aggregation numbers, a model for packing of the monomeric polar head is proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography · Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physical and Life Science, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, 375 Church Street, North Adams, Massachusetts 01247-4100, Department of Chemistry, Carthage College, Kenosha, Wisconsin 53140, and Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang J. · Anal. Chem. · 1994 · 66 · 377310.1021/ac00093a037 ↗
2. Shamsi S. A. · Anal. Chem. · 1997 · 69 · 298010.1021/ac970037a ↗
3. Billiot F. H. · J. Chromatogr. A · 2001 · 922 · 32910.1016/S0021-9673(01)00865-2 ↗
4. Billiot E. · Anal. Chem. · 2000 · 72 · 174010.1021/ac9908804 ↗
5. Billiot E. · Anal. Chem. · 1998 · 70 · 137510.1021/ac9709561 ↗
6. Billiot E. · Anal. Chem. · 1999 · 71 · 125
7. Billiot E. · Anal. Chem. · 1999 · 71 · 404410.1021/ac990540i ↗
8. McCarroll M. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 317310.1021/ja005604h ↗
9. Haddadian F. · Electrophoresis · 1999 · 20 · 301110.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991001)20:15/16<3011::AID-ELPS3011>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
10. Haddadian F. · J. Chromatogr. A · 1999 · 858 · 21910.1016/S0021-9673(99)00810-9 ↗
11. Pirkle W. H. · J. Chromatogr. · 1984 · 316 · 58510.1016/S0021-9673(00)96185-5 ↗
12. Dobashi A. · Anal. Chem. · 1988 · 60 · 198510.1021/ac00169a032 ↗
13. Lin C.-E. · J. Chromatogr. A · 1996 · 722
14. Turro N. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1978 · 100 · 595110.1021/ja00486a062 ↗
15. Jobe D. J. · Langmuir · 1995 · 11 · 247610.1021/la00007a027 ↗
16. Hoult D. I. · J. Magn. Reson. · 1976 · 21 · 337
17. Davis J. E. · Aust. J. Chem. · 1981 · 34 · 141310.1071/CH9811413 ↗
18. Paleos C. M. · J. Macromol. Sci., Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys. · 1988 · 28 · 310.1080/15583728808085381 ↗
19. Newcomb L. F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 650910.1021/ja00129a014 ↗
20. Dobashi A. · J. Chromatogr. A · 1997 · 780 · 17910.1016/S0021-9673(97)00546-3 ↗
21. Janin J. · J. Mol. Biol. · 1978 · 125 · 35710.1016/0022-2836(78)90408-4 ↗
22. Rabenstein D. L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1973 · 95 · 279710.1021/ja00790a009 ↗
23. Ramachandran G. N. · Adv. Protein Chem. · 1968 · 23 · 28310.1016/S0065-3233(08)60402-7 ↗
24. Karimi-Nejad Y. · Biochemistry · 1994 · 33 · 548110.1021/bi00184a017 ↗
25. Shinitzky M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1993 · 115 · 1254510.1021/ja00079a038 ↗