journal article·1999-08-01

Transport Diffusion of Oxygen−Nitrogen Mixtures in Graphite Pores: A Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics (NEMD) Study

Karl P. Travis, Keith E. Gubbins

Langmuir· Volume 15· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The technique of dual control volume grand canonical molecular dynamics (DCV GCMD) is used to study the diffusivity of a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen in a graphite slit pore as a function of pore width. We find evidence in support of combined viscous and diffusive transport through these narrow slit pores. The viscous contribution to the flow becomes weaker as the pore width decreases. The fluid velocity profiles show evidence of microscopic slip but still retain a classical Navier−Stokes parabolic signature. The concentration profiles for each component in the mixture show an approximately linear variation with distance along the pore length, suggesting that cross-coupling effects are weak. We find that the diffusion of oxygen−nitrogen mixtures through a graphite pore displays a complex dependence upon the pore width. Molecular packing appears to play a very significant role in determining the flow of the mixture. Thermodynamic effects are of more importance in these simulations than sieving effects; hence, we do not find a greater diffusivity for oxygen compared to nitrogen.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · NMR spectroscopy and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Riddick Laboratories, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Jüntgen H. · Fuel · 1981 · 69 · 81710.1016/0016-2361(81)90144-7 ↗
2. Chihara K. · J. Colloid. Int. Sci. · 1978 · 64 · 58410.1016/0021-9797(78)90402-2 ↗
3. Kärger J. · 1992
4. Singh A. · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 1996 · 35 · 123110.1021/ie950559l ↗
5. Chihara K. · Carbon · 1979 · 17 · 33910.1016/0008-6223(79)90006-X ↗
6. Seaton N. A. · J. Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 119910.1021/la9510644 ↗
7. Heffelfinger G. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1994 · 100 · 754810.1063/1.466849 ↗
8. MacElroy J. M. D. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1994 · 101 · 527410.1063/1.467381 ↗
9. Cracknell R. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 74 · 246310.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2463 ↗
10. Pohl P. I. · Mol. Phys. · 1996 · 89 · 172510.1080/00268979609482570 ↗
11. Ford D. M. · Mol. Phys. · 1998 · 94 · 67310.1080/002689798167836 ↗
12. Travis K. P. · 1998 · 1166
13. deGroot S. R. · 1953
14. Mason E. A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1978 · 68 · 356210.1063/1.436213 ↗
15. Mason E. A. · 1983
16. Eringen A. C. · 1969
17. Travis K. P. · J. Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 55 · 428810.1103/PhysRevE.55.4288 ↗
18. Steele W. A. · 1974
19. Weiner S. J. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1986 · 7 · 23010.1002/jcc.540070216 ↗
20. Beenakker J. J. M. · Chem. Phys. Letts. · 1995 · 232 · 37910.1016/0009-2614(94)01372-3 ↗
21. Kaneko K. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 460610.1021/la00024a036 ↗
22. Irving J. H. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1950 · 18 · 81710.1063/1.1747782 ↗
23. Nose S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
24. Hoover W. G. · Phys. Rev. A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
25. Evans D. J. · 1990
26. Allen M. P. · 1987
27. Daivis P. J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1992 · 97 · 61610.1063/1.463558 ↗
28. Widom B. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1963 · 39 · 280210.1063/1.1734110 ↗
29. Frenkel D. · 1996
30. Travis K. P. · 1998