Multimodal Membrane Poration by Thanatin
Source abstract
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance has motivated the search for antimicrobial agents with multimodal mechanisms of action. Host defense peptides and bacteriocins hold particular promise in this regard. Among many molecules discovered to date, thanatin appears to represent the properties of the two classes in that it, like bacteriocins, adopts a highly stable fold in solution and, like host defense peptides, exhibits broad-spectrum antibiotic activity. The peptide is believed to depolarize bacterial outer membranes and inhibit lipopolysaccharide transport while restoring bacterial susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics. However, a direct observation of whether and how thanatin affects membranes is lacking. Here we reason that the peptide should promote bacteriocin-like multimodal poration in phospholipid bilayers. We demonstrate that thanatin induces poration with elements of membrane thinning, fractal ruptures, and transmembrane channels, a phenomenon common for bacteriocin folds but atypical of antimicrobial peptides. The results offer mechanistic insight into the action of antimicrobial agents emerging from different molecular classes but with similar properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, U.K.
Department of Physics, King’s College London, Strand Lane, London WC2R 2LS, U.K.
London Centre for Nanotechnology
University College London
Department of Physics & Astronomy
Funding
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-010.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y ↗
3. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30327-310.1016/S1473-3099(20)30327-3 ↗
4. 10.1038/nrmicro293710.1038/nrmicro2937 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.93.3.122110.1073/pnas.93.3.1221 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.18383910.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183839 ↗
7. 10.1126/sciadv.aau263410.1126/sciadv.aau2634 ↗
8. 10.1126/sciadv.adg368310.1126/sciadv.adg3683 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-019-11503-310.1038/s41467-019-11503-3 ↗
10. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.0090910.3389/fmicb.2020.00909 ↗
11. 10.1038/nri118010.1038/nri1180 ↗
12. 10.1038/nrd359110.1038/nrd3591 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0052010.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00520 ↗
14. 10.1038/nchembio.111610.1038/nchembio.1116 ↗
15. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100418010.1371/journal.pcbi.1004180 ↗
16. 10.1101/cshperspect.a02528810.1101/cshperspect.a025288 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10142310.1016/j.isci.2020.101423 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.10178210.1016/j.xpro.2022.101782 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-210.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmeth.406710.1038/nmeth.4067 ↗
21. 10.1002/jcc.2094510.1002/jcc.20945 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-210.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
23. Pedregosa F. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2011 · 12 · 2825
24. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.5510.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
25. Gowers, R. J.; Linke, M.; Barnoud, J.; Reddy, T. J. E.; Melo, M. N.; Seyler, S. L.; Domanski, J.; Dotson, D. L.; Buchoux, S.; Kenney, I. M.; Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: A Python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. In Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference; Benthall, S., Rostrup, S., Eds. 2016; pp 98–105.10.25080/Majora-629e541a-00e ↗
26. 10.1002/jcc.2178710.1002/jcc.21787 ↗
27. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
28. 10.1039/D2NR00434H10.1039/D2NR00434H ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.01510.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.015 ↗
30. 10.1038/nprot.2008.14910.1038/nprot.2008.149 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6SC02925F10.1039/C6SC02925F ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-018-35521-110.1038/s41598-018-35521-1 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.122282411010.1073/pnas.1222824110 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-017-02475-310.1038/s41467-017-02475-3 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0021810.1021/acsnano.1c00218 ↗
36. 10.5483/BMBRep.2002.35.3.29110.5483/BMBRep.2002.35.3.291 ↗
37. 10.1128/AAC.00041-1610.1128/AAC.00041-16 ↗
38. 10.1021/cb100155810.1021/cb1001558 ↗
39. 10.1529/biophysj.104.05642410.1529/biophysj.104.056424 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75115-710.1016/S0006-3495(03)75115-7 ↗
41. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.72552610.3389/fmicb.2021.725526 ↗
42. 10.1021/ja054721f10.1021/ja054721f ↗
43. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2560404.x10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2560404.x ↗
44. 10.1073/pnas.130701011010.1073/pnas.1307010110 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c0327610.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03276 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.02.02310.1016/j.bbamem.2010.02.023 ↗
47. 10.1074/jbc.M31381720010.1074/jbc.M313817200 ↗
48. 10.1039/c2ra20108a10.1039/c2ra20108a ↗
49. 10.1126/science.113027910.1126/science.1130279 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja062927q10.1021/ja062927q ↗
51. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.18344710.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183447 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b0015710.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00157 ↗
53. 10.1002/anie.20170231310.1002/anie.201702313 ↗
54. 10.1093/femsre/fuv00810.1093/femsre/fuv008 ↗
55. 10.1128/AAC.00321-0910.1128/AAC.00321-09 ↗
56. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02528.x10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02528.x ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c0102510.1021/acs.jctc.0c01025 ↗
58. 10.1039/C5SC03260A10.1039/C5SC03260A ↗
59. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0681410.1021/acsnano.9b06814 ↗
60. 10.1074/jbc.M113.45956010.1074/jbc.M113.459560 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.drup.2016.04.00210.1016/j.drup.2016.04.002 ↗
62. 10.1371/journal.ppat.100944310.1371/journal.ppat.1009443 ↗
63. 10.1128/spectrum.00973-2210.1128/spectrum.00973-22 ↗