Development of Hematite Nano Ellipsoids/Pectin Composite Films for Green Packaging Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Synthetic packaging materials are known to cause serious environmental and human health problems. Among the eco-friendly biopolymers from nonfood sources that are suitable for packaging applications, pectin is a promising candidate. However, native pectin films (NPF) exhibit poor mechanical strength, high hydrophilicity, and poor gas diffusion barrier properties. These shortcomings offset the advantages of pectin as a potential packaging material. To address these limitations, in this study, hematite nano ellipsoids (HNEs) were incorporated as fillers to reinforce native pectin films. This reinforcement resulted in substantial improvements in the mechanical properties, hydrophobicity, thermal stability, barrier properties, and optical attributes of pectin films. Compared to NPF, the pectin-hematite composite film exhibited a 35% increase in tensile strength, a 30° increase in contact angle, a 6-fold increase in the oxygen diffusion barrier properties, and a 20% increase in the water vapor barrier properties. This study presents a sustainable, biocompatible, and biodegradable packaging solution by capitalizing on eco-friendly biopolymer and nanoparticle engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Polymer Engineering and Colloid Science Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
Department of Applied Mechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai 600036, India
Funding
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · Science and Engineering Research Board
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Defruyt S. · J. Field Actions · 2019 · 78
2. United Nations. Why Aren’t We Recycling More Plastic ?, Vol. 1; United Nations Development Program, 2024; pp 1–10.
3. MacRae R. J. · 2014 · 1 · 1
4. 10.3390/ma1321499410.3390/ma13214994 ↗
5. Garside M. · Statista · 2024 · 1 · 1
6. 10.3390/foods1117268310.3390/foods11172683 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1315240310.3390/polym13152403 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41598-022-25192-410.1038/s41598-022-25192-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.10710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.107 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1579210.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15792 ↗
11. 10.2147/IJN.S35513110.2147/IJN.S355131 ↗
12. 10.1021/mp700128510.1021/mp7001285 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.10084510.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100845 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jece.2018.02.03710.1016/j.jece.2018.02.037 ↗
15. 10.1007/s42452-018-0006-y10.1007/s42452-018-0006-y ↗
16. 10.1039/D4TB00052H10.1039/D4TB00052H ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0045610.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00456 ↗
18. 10.1006/jcis.1998.604210.1006/jcis.1998.6042 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.10.03210.1016/j.carbpol.2008.10.032 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12161-022-02343-x10.1007/s12161-022-02343-x ↗
21. 10.1007/s10924-018-1254-z10.1007/s10924-018-1254-z ↗
22. 10.1177/002199831141298510.1177/0021998311412985 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cherd.2019.11.00610.1016/j.cherd.2019.11.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10727510.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107275 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0229910.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02299 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00289-020-03208-110.1007/s00289-020-03208-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.029 ↗
28. 10.1002/1097-0282(2000)57:4<257::AID-BIP7>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/1097-0282(2000)57:4<257::AID-BIP7>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12588-011-0019-510.1007/s12588-011-0019-5 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10924-020-01829-110.1007/s10924-020-01829-1 ↗
31. Bagheri S. · Res. J. Chem. Sci. · 2013 · 3 · 62
32. 10.1155/2019/104914210.1155/2019/1049142 ↗
33. 10.3390/ma306346810.3390/ma3063468 ↗
34. 10.3390/ijms2106222410.3390/ijms21062224 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.198210.1002/app.1982 ↗
36. 10.1080/15685551.2019.156566410.1080/15685551.2019.1565664 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1507172410.3390/polym15071724 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20040098410.1002/adma.200400984 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.80310.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.803 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.00410.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.10.00210.1016/j.fpsl.2017.10.002 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.10525610.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105256 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00036-810.1016/S0079-6700(00)00036-8 ↗
45. 10.1002/app.2368710.1002/app.23687 ↗
46. 10.1002/pts.264210.1002/pts.2642 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.09.00210.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.09.002 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1421448710.3390/polym14214487 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.clay.2017.02.01410.1016/j.clay.2017.02.014 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.10606910.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106069 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.12.01510.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.12.015 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.minpro.2004.01.00710.1016/j.minpro.2004.01.007 ↗
53. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.03006.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.03006.x ↗
54. 10.3390/molecules2506131010.3390/molecules25061310 ↗
55. 10.1039/b810164g10.1039/b810164g ↗
56. 10.1177/1847980421106231610.1177/18479804211062316 ↗
57. 10.3390/ma1510347910.3390/ma15103479 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11583310.1016/j.molliq.2021.115833 ↗
59. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/10/01410.1088/0957-4484/17/10/014 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10631410.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106314 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.surfin.2019.10039410.1016/j.surfin.2019.100394 ↗
62. 10.1088/1742-6596/1999/1/01212810.1088/1742-6596/1999/1/012128 ↗