A π–π Bonding-Assisted Molecular-Wiring of Folded-Cytochrome c and Naphthoquinone and Its Electron-Relay-Based Bioelectrocatalytic H2O2 Reduction Reaction Visualized by Redox-Competitive Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
The electron-transfer (ET) reaction of cytochrome c (Cytc) protein with biomolecules is a cutting-edge research area of interest in understanding the functionalities of natural systems. Several electrochemical biomimicking studies based on Cytc-protein-modified electrodes prepared via electrostatic interaction and covalent bonding approaches have been reported. Indeed, natural enzymes involve multiple types of bonding, such as hydrogen, ionic, covalent, and π–π, etc. In this work, we explore a Cytc-protein chemically modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE/CB@NQ/Cytc) prepared via π–π bonding using graphitic carbon as an underlying surface and an aromatic organic molecule, naphthoquinone (NQ), as a cofactor for an effective ET reaction. A simple drop-casting technique-based preparation of GCE/CB@NQ showed a distinct surface-confined redox peak at a standard electrode potential ( E °) = −0.2 V vs Ag/AgCl (surface excess = 21.3 nmol cm –2 ) in pH 7 phosphate buffer solution. A control experiment of modification of NQ on an unmodified GCE failed to show any such unique feature. For the preparation of GCE/CB@NQ/Cytc, a dilute solution of Cytc–pH 7 phosphate buffer was drop-cast on the GCE/CB@NQ surface, wherein the protein folding and denaturalization-based complication and its associated ET functionalities were avoided. Molecular dynamics simulation studies show the complexation of NQ with Cytc at the protein binding sites. The protein-bound surface shows an efficient and selective bioelectrocatalytic reduction performance of H 2 O 2, as demonstrated using cyclic voltammetry and amperometric i – t techniques. Finally, the redox-competition scanning electrochemical microscopy (RC-SECM) technique was adopted for in situ visualization of the electroactive adsorbed surface. The RC-SECM images clearly show the regions of highly bioelectrocatalytic active sites of Cytc-proteins bound to NQ molecules on a graphitic carbon surface. The binding of Cytc with NQ has significant implications for studying the biological electron transport mechanism, and the proposed method provides the requisite framework for such a study.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nano and Bioelectrochemistry Research Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide and Green Technology Research Centre, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Chemistry, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0224210.1038/nature02242 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.11.01010.1016/j.bbabio.2010.11.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.01310.1016/j.bios.2016.09.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.03910.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.039 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13442710.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134427 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10073410.1016/j.coelec.2021.100734 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsabm.8b0058410.1021/acsabm.8b00584 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10579810.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105798 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr970328j10.1021/cr970328j ↗
10. 10.1021/ar00173a00210.1021/ar00173a002 ↗
11. 10.1039/c1cs15030h10.1039/c1cs15030h ↗
12. 10.1039/B506136A10.1039/B506136A ↗
13. 10.1021/jp992591p10.1021/jp992591p ↗
14. 10.1021/la063697w10.1021/la063697w ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.12.02010.1016/j.jelechem.2008.12.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.13918710.1016/j.cplett.2021.139187 ↗
17. 10.1016/0302-4598(91)80033-Y10.1016/0302-4598(91)80033-Y ↗
18. 10.1016/0167-2738(96)00143-910.1016/0167-2738(96)00143-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0956-5663(01)00319-010.1016/S0956-5663(01)00319-0 ↗
20. 10.1021/la062668i10.1021/la062668i ↗
21. 10.1021/jp002971710.1021/jp0029717 ↗
22. 10.1021/ac702417x10.1021/ac702417x ↗
23. Kumar A. S. · 2020 · 1342 · 18510.1021/bk-2020-1342.ch009 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10008-017-3598-z10.1007/s10008-017-3598-z ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.8b0476410.1021/acsami.8b04764 ↗
26. 10.1021/ac048743g10.1021/ac048743g ↗
27. 10.1021/jp208348810.1021/jp2083488 ↗
28. 10.1002/1521-4109(200011)12:17<1383::AID-ELAN1383>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/1521-4109(200011)12:17<1383::AID-ELAN1383>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13759610.1016/j.electacta.2020.137596 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.14827710.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148277 ↗
31. 10.1021/cr500023c10.1021/cr500023c ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2007.08.01610.1016/j.jelechem.2007.08.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.07.02710.1016/j.elecom.2013.07.027 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.01110.1016/j.snb.2015.11.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mencom.2020.05.01210.1016/j.mencom.2020.05.012 ↗
36. 10.1039/C3AN02137H10.1039/C3AN02137H ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.13918710.1016/j.cplett.2021.139187 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10008-017-3598-z10.1007/s10008-017-3598-z ↗
39. 10.1093/nar/gkaa103810.1093/nar/gkaa1038 ↗
40. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-17310.1186/1471-2105-13-173 ↗
41. 10.1093/nar/gkaa97110.1093/nar/gkaa971 ↗
42. 10.1186/1758-2946-3-3310.1186/1758-2946-3-33 ↗
43. 10.1186/1758-2946-4-1710.1186/1758-2946-4-17 ↗
44. 10.1093/nar/gki48110.1093/nar/gki481 ↗
45. 10.1126/science.687917010.1126/science.6879170 ↗
46. 10.1107/S002188988301098510.1107/S0021889883010985 ↗
47. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.085910.1006/jmbi.1996.0859 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.00110.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
49. 10.1107/S090744490401167910.1107/S0907444904011679 ↗
50. Turner, P. J. XMGRACE, Version 5.1.25. Center for Coastal and Land-Margin Research; Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology: Beaverton, OR, USA, 2015; p 2005.
51. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.10.01010.1016/j.jelechem.2016.10.010 ↗
52. 10.1039/b413177k10.1039/b413177k ↗
53. 10.1021/la100462r10.1021/la100462r ↗
54. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.05.01010.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.05.010 ↗
55. 10.1016/S0022-0728(79)80075-310.1016/S0022-0728(79)80075-3 ↗
56. 10.1039/an994190085510.1039/an9941900855 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.03.02310.1016/j.jelechem.2018.03.023 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.02110.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.021 ↗
59. Schrödinger, L.; DeLano, W. PyMOL. (2020). http://www.pymol.org/pymol.
60. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54666-410.1016/S0021-9258(18)54666-4 ↗
61. 10.1002/1439-7633(20020104)3:1<110::AID-CBIC110>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1439-7633(20020104)3:1<110::AID-CBIC110>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
62. 10.1021/jp076807w10.1021/jp076807w ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0031710.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00317 ↗
64. 10.1039/b609511a10.1039/b609511a ↗
65. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13980610.1016/j.electacta.2021.139806 ↗