Homogeneous Redox Mediators Applied to Li–S Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are promising as next‐generation energy storage, primarily due to their high theoretical specific energy density combined with a low‐cost cathode active material. However, incomplete sulfur utilization, polysulfide (PS) shuttling, sluggish redox kinetics, etc. still limit their practical performance. Employing homogeneous redox mediators (RMs) to the electrolyte is one strategy to improve charge transfer and facilitate key solid–liquid transitions. While both metallocene and quinone‐based RMs have shown promise, their reactivities with sulfur, PSs, and electrolyte components in general remain poorly understood. Here, we systematically investigate two metallocene RMs, decamethylferrocene (DmFc) and decamethylmanganocene (DmMn), and two quinone RMs, anthraquinone (AQ) and 1,4‐bis(methylamino)‐9,10‐anthraquinone (NHQ), across various Li–S battery designs including sulfur‐, PS catholyte‐, and Li 2 S‐based active materials, and weakly solvating electrolytes. We show that the efficacy of these RMs is highly sensitive to sulfur speciation and electrolyte composition and that AQ is most versatile with suitable redox potential, high chemical stability, and efficient regeneration. Together, these findings provide guidelines for selecting RMs for specific Li–S battery technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden
Department of Chemistry – Ångström Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
ALISTORE—European Research Institute CNRS FR 3104, Hub de l’Energie Amiens France
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
2. 10.1039/C5EE01388G10.1039/C5EE01388G ↗
3. 10.1149/1.180639410.1149/1.1806394 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.01510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.11810.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.118 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0022810.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00228 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20180309610.1002/aenm.201803096 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.230126012010.1073/pnas.2301260120 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0204910.1021/acsenergylett.4c02049 ↗
10. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad5b8c10.1149/1945-7111/ad5b8c ↗
11. 10.1039/C2CC36986A10.1039/C2CC36986A ↗
12. T.Ishikawa S.Haga K.Shigenobu et al. 2024.Faraday Discussions.
13. 10.1039/C4CP04895D10.1039/C4CP04895D ↗
14. 10.1149/1.212907910.1149/1.2129079 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c0099010.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00990 ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20150011310.1002/aenm.201500113 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.076 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.074 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0089610.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00896 ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms876010.1038/ncomms8760 ↗
21. 10.1039/c2ee23411d10.1039/c2ee23411d ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20150011010.1002/aenm.201500110 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0093610.1021/acsenergylett.0c00936 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja305220610.1021/ja3052206 ↗
25. Catalytic effects in lithium–sulfur batteries: promoted sulfur transformation and reduced shuttle effect
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15364810.1016/j.cej.2024.153648 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41580-024-00730-210.1038/s41580-024-00730-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/B978-0-12-386964-7.00013-510.1016/B978-0-12-386964-7.00013-5 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0901810jes10.1149/2.0901810jes ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.5b0447210.1021/jacs.5b04472 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6EE00104A10.1039/C6EE00104A ↗
32. 10.1039/C9EE01338E10.1039/C9EE01338E ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.04010.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.040 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.161583711410.1073/pnas.1615837114 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0416610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04166 ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms1462710.1038/ncomms14627 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0060310.1021/acsenergylett.6b00603 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.6b0564710.1021/acsami.6b05647 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20150155910.1002/adma.201501559 ↗
40. 10.1021/jz500222f10.1021/jz500222f ↗
41. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.01810.1016/j.joule.2018.12.018 ↗
42. 10.1021/jp501546610.1021/jp5015466 ↗
43. 10.1149/2.002207jes10.1149/2.002207jes ↗
44. 10.1149/1.314872110.1149/1.3148721 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.009 ↗
46. 10.1039/C9DT03551F10.1039/C9DT03551F ↗
47. J. L.Robbins United States 1981.
48. 10.1038/s41467-018-03116-z10.1038/s41467-018-03116-z ↗
49. 10.1021/j100472a01810.1021/j100472a018 ↗
50. 10.1002/cphc.20150044810.1002/cphc.201500448 ↗
51. 10.1139/v86-24710.1139/v86-247 ↗
52. X‐Ray Structural Analyses of Cyclodecasulfur (S10) and of a Cyclohexasulfur‐Cyclodecasulfur Molecular Addition Compound (S6 • S10)[1].
53. 10.1002/batt.20190018810.1002/batt.201900188 ↗
54. 10.1021/ic50116a04710.1021/ic50116a047 ↗
55. 10.1021/ic00161a02410.1021/ic00161a024 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp500382s10.1021/jp500382s ↗
57. 10.1038/s41560-017-0005-z10.1038/s41560-017-0005-z ↗
58. 10.1038/s41467-018-07975-410.1038/s41467-018-07975-4 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0365410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03654 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.174272310.1063/1.1742723 ↗
61. 10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X ↗
62. 10.1016/0022-1902(77)80198-X10.1016/0022-1902(77)80198-X ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b0036110.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361 ↗