Sulfosuccinate and Sulfocarballylate Surfactants As Charge Control Additives in Nonpolar Solvents
Source abstract
Abstract
A series of eight sodium sulfonic acid surfactants with differently branched tails (four double-chain sulfosuccinates and four triple-chain sulfocarballylates) were studied as charging agents for sterically stabilized poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) latexes in dodecane. Tail branching was found to have no significant effect on the electrophoretic mobility of the latexes, but the number of tails was found to influence the electrophoretic mobility. Triple-chain, sulfocarballylate surfactants were found to be more effective. Several possible origins of this observation were explored by comparing sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate (AOT1) and sodium trioctylsulfocarballylate (TC1) using identical approaches: the inverse micelle size, the propensity for ion dissociation, the electrical conductivity, the electrokinetic or ζ potential, and contrast-variation small-angle neutron scattering. The most likely origin of the increased ability of TC1 to charge PMMA latexes is a larger number of inverse micelles. These experiments demonstrate a small molecular variation that can be made to influence the ability of surfactants to charge particles in nonpolar solvents, and modifying molecular structure is a promising approach to developing more effective charging agents.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
Merck Chemicals Ltd, University Parkway, Chilworth, Southampton, SO16 7QD, United Kingdom
ISIS-STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Science and Technology Facilities Council · Merck Chemicals Ltd. UK
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C2CP42625K10.1039/C2CP42625K ↗
2. 10.1039/C5SM01190F10.1039/C5SM01190F ↗
3. 10.1016/0927-7757(93)80026-B10.1016/0927-7757(93)80026-B ↗
4. Klinkenberg A. · 1958
5. 10.1002/app.1985.07030021210.1002/app.1985.070300212 ↗
6. 10.1109/PROC.1973.917310.1109/PROC.1973.9173 ↗
7. 10.1038/2834910.1038/28349 ↗
8. 10.1021/la000342i10.1021/la000342i ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20090154310.1002/anie.200901543 ↗
10. 10.1021/la102303q10.1021/la102303q ↗
11. Hudson, L. K.Structure versus Performance Surfactants at Interfaces. Ph.D. thesis,University of Bristol, 2008.
12. 10.1039/f2976720152510.1039/f29767201525 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.07510.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.075 ↗
14. 10.1021/la500331u10.1021/la500331u ↗
15. 10.1016/0166-6622(86)80187-110.1016/0166-6622(86)80187-1 ↗
16. 10.1080/10448632.2011.56953110.1080/10448632.2011.569531 ↗
17. 10.1107/S002188989700217310.1107/S0021889897002173 ↗
18. 10.1107/S002188988708718110.1107/S0021889887087181 ↗
19. 10.1039/C3SM52563E10.1039/C3SM52563E ↗
20. Frisch M. J. · 2009
21. 10.1021/jp960976r10.1021/jp960976r ↗
22. 10.1071/CH0630410.1071/CH06304 ↗
23. 10.1016/0927-7757(94)02743-910.1016/0927-7757(94)02743-9 ↗
24. Pitt, A.InAmphiphiles at Interfaces;Texter, J., Ed.; Progress in Colloid Polymer Science Series;Steinkopff, 1997; Vol103, pp307–317.
25. 10.1021/la00016a00710.1021/la00016a007 ↗
26. Tanford C. · 1980
27. 10.1021/la040095910.1021/la0400959 ↗
28. 10.1021/la000341q10.1021/la000341q ↗
29. Nave, S.Phase behaviour and interfacial properties of double-chain anionic surfactants. Ph.D. thesis,University of Bristol, 2001.
30. Bjerrum N. · Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk., Math.-fys. Medd. · 1926 · 7 · 1
31. 10.1002/andp.1906324020410.1002/andp.19063240204 ↗
32. 10.1002/andp.1911339031310.1002/andp.19113390313 ↗
33. Roberts, G. S.Single Particle Optical Microelectrophoresis: Direct Measurement of Effective Charges in Nonaqueous Systems. Ph.D. thesis,University of Bristol, 2007.
34. 10.1021/j100266a04610.1021/j100266a046 ↗
35. Guinier A. · 1955
36. 10.1021/la904207x10.1021/la904207x ↗
37. 10.1021/la046751m10.1021/la046751m ↗
38. 10.1063/1.273496810.1063/1.2734968 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.01830310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.018303 ↗
40. 10.1021/la703908n10.1021/la703908n ↗
41. 10.1039/B703994H10.1039/B703994H ↗
42. 10.1021/la802460610.1021/la8024606 ↗
43. 10.1021/la702432u10.1021/la702432u ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.13830110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.138301 ↗
45. 10.1039/b926845f10.1039/b926845f ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.12.04810.1016/j.jcis.2014.12.048 ↗
47. 10.1021/la400117s10.1021/la400117s ↗
48. 10.1351/pac19946605107710.1351/pac199466051077 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.07.05110.1016/j.jcis.2012.07.051 ↗
50. 10.1021/j100338a06210.1021/j100338a062 ↗
51. 10.1007/BF0152662010.1007/BF01526620 ↗
52. 10.1351/pac20057710175310.1351/pac200577101753 ↗
53. 10.1039/f2978740160710.1039/f29787401607 ↗
54. 10.1006/jcis.1997.479010.1006/jcis.1997.4790 ↗
55. 10.1039/C3SM53027B10.1039/C3SM53027B ↗
56. 10.1021/jp064573v10.1021/jp064573v ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.01.05510.1016/j.jcis.2010.01.055 ↗
58. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/44/44570910.1088/0957-4484/22/44/445709 ↗
59. 10.1039/c3cp51212f10.1039/c3cp51212f ↗
60. 10.1021/la202660d10.1021/la202660d ↗