journal article·2023-02-21

Switchable Separation Strategy via Host–Guest Locks

Xinling Lu, Hui Xu, Yue Cheng, Wei Liu, Yong Wang

Langmuir· Volume 39· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Universal separation strategies are the ultimate goal in separation science. However, there is always a tradeoff between universality and selectivity due to the negative influence among different recognition domains. With the goal of universal separation in mind, an unprecedented, switchable, and versatile separation strategy using reversible supramolecular host-guest interactions has been developed. These adjustable separation mediums were prepared using surface-grafted cationic cyclodextrin to firmly bind negatively charged adamantane derivatives. By changing guest structures, the surface functionality of the separation medium can be precisely regulated to be selective for a variety of substrates including chiral or achiral molecules, thus producing satisfactory single-column universality. This method offers a new approach to move beyond conventional separation methodologies and should stimulate the design of switchable functional materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300075, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b0066310.1021/acs.analchem.5b00663 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.46278610.1016/j.chroma.2021.462786 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.abe019210.1126/science.abe0192 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.0c1105010.1021/jacs.0c11050 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.46134110.1016/j.chroma.2020.461341 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20190679710.1002/adfm.201906797 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0024610.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00246 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.46090410.1016/j.chroma.2020.460904 ↗
9. 10.1021/am302889j10.1021/am302889j ↗
10. 10.1021/ac001350710.1021/ac0013507 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0271910.1021/acsnano.1c02719 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.9b0317710.1021/jacs.9b03177 ↗
13. 10.1038/nchem.191610.1038/nchem.1916 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20140584910.1002/anie.201405849 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-018-04303-810.1038/s41467-018-04303-8 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja302998q10.1021/ja302998q ↗
17. 10.1038/356136a010.1038/356136a0 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature1618510.1038/nature16185 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41557-021-00652-y10.1038/s41557-021-00652-y ↗
20. 10.1126/science.291.5504.63610.1126/science.291.5504.636 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20160664110.1002/adma.201606641 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.370464010.1126/science.3704640 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.04910.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.049 ↗
24. Scriba G. K. E. · TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. · 2019 · 120 · 11563910.1016/j.trac.2019.115639 ↗
25. 10.1002/jssc.20210059310.1002/jssc.202100593 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.06.07410.1016/j.chroma.2016.06.074 ↗
27. 10.1038/nprot.2011.34010.1038/nprot.2011.340 ↗
28. Gong Y. · J. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 8 · 49910.3184/174751913X13735527483211 ↗
29. Frisch M. J. · 2013
30. Marenich A. V. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 13 · 637810.1021/jp810292n ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
33. Legault C. Y. · 2009
34. Delano W. L. · 2002
35. 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.06.07410.1016/j.chroma.2016.06.074 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-021-27659-w10.1038/s41467-021-27659-w ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20161215010.1002/anie.201612150 ↗
38. 10.1039/b813999g10.1039/b813999g ↗
39. 10.1021/cr970019t10.1021/cr970019t ↗
40. 10.1021/jp309788z10.1021/jp309788z ↗
41. 10.1021/ja039890j10.1021/ja039890j ↗
42. 10.1021/jp035075e10.1021/jp035075e ↗
43. 10.1039/c2cc17321b10.1039/c2cc17321b ↗
44. 10.1021/bc500033d10.1021/bc500033d ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cclet.2012.04.00210.1016/j.cclet.2012.04.002 ↗