journal article·2024-02-06Open access

Spectroscopic and Microscopic Characterization of Microbial Biofouling on Aircraft Fuel Tanks

Jaime Gómez-Bolívar, Martin P. Warburton, Adam D. Mumford, Juan F. Mujica-Alarcón, Lorna Anguilano, Uchechukwu Onwukwe, James Barnes, Myrsini Chronopoulou, Yon Ju-Nam, Steven F. Thornton, Stephen A. Rolfe, Jesús J. Ojeda

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Avoiding microbial contamination and biofilm formation on the surfaces of aircraft fuel tanks is a major challenge in the aviation industry. The inevitable presence of water in fuel systems and nutrients provided by the fuel makes an ideal environment for bacteria, fungi, and yeast to grow. Understanding how microbes grow on different fuel tank materials is the first step to control biofilm formation in aviation fuel systems. In this study, biofilms of Pseudomonas putida, a model Gram-negative bacterium previously found in aircraft fuel tanks, were characterized on aluminum 7075-T6 surfaces, which is an alloy used by the aviation industry due to favorable properties including high strength and fatigue resistance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) showed that extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) produced by P. putida were important components of biofilms with a likely role in biofilm stability and adhesion to the surfaces. EDX analysis showed that the proportion of phosphorus with respect to nitrogen is higher in the EPS than in the bacterial cells. Additionally, different morphologies in biofilm formation were observed in the fuel phase compared to the water phase. Micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (micro-FTIR) analysis suggested that phosphoryl and carboxyl functional groups are fundamental for the irreversible attachment between the EPS of bacteria and the aluminum surface, by the formation of hydrogen bonds and inner-sphere complexes between the macromolecules and the aluminum surface. Based on the hypothesis that nucleic acids (particularly DNA) are an important component of EPS in P. putida biofilms, the impact of degrading extracellular DNA was tested. Treatment with the enzyme DNase I affected both water and fuel phase biofilms─with the cell structure disrupted in the aqueous phase, but cells remained attached to the aluminum coupons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants · Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Environmental Chemistry and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, U.K.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, U.K.

Experimental Techniques Centre, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, U.K.

Airbus Operations Ltd, Pegasus House, Aerospace Avenue, Filton, Bristol BS34 7PA, U.K.

Conidia Bioscience Ltd, Bakeham Lane, Englefield Green, Egham TW20 9TY, U.K.

Groundwater Protection and Restoration Group, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Broad Lane, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HQ, U.K.

Funding

Airbus UK · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Innovate UK

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.01.00810.1016/j.ibiod.2010.01.008 ↗
2. Mara D. · 2003
3. 10.1007/BF0014293710.1007/BF00142937 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.07010.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.070 ↗
5. 10.1590/S0001-3714199900010000110.1590/S0001-37141999000100001 ↗
6. 10.1021/ef901548r10.1021/ef901548r ↗
7. 10.1590/S1517-8382200100040000110.1590/S1517-83822001000400001 ↗
8. 10.1590/S1517-83824622014011210.1590/S1517-838246220140112 ↗
9. 10.1002/jobm.20071033710.1002/jobm.200710337 ↗
10. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.0237910.3389/fmicb.2017.02379 ↗
11. 10.1080/08927014.2016.117751510.1080/08927014.2016.1177515 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.08.00210.1016/j.ibiod.2012.08.002 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10295-005-0023-x10.1007/s10295-005-0023-x ↗
14. 10.1016/S0007-1536(64)80024-310.1016/S0007-1536(64)80024-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/0964-8305(94)90083-310.1016/0964-8305(94)90083-3 ↗
16. 10.1071/BT969033110.1071/BT9690331 ↗
17. 10.3201/eid0809.02006310.3201/eid0809.020063 ↗
18. 10.1038/nrmicro241510.1038/nrmicro2415 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn504438310.1021/nn5044383 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11356-018-2473-510.1007/s11356-018-2473-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.04710.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.047 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02223.x10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02223.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.01110.1016/j.tim.2015.01.011 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.01210.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.012 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1981.tb04257.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.1981.tb04257.x ↗
26. 10.1007/s10529-019-02644-y10.1007/s10529-019-02644-y ↗
27. Abràmoff M. D. · Biophotonics international · 2004 · 11 · 36
28. 10.1007/s00284-019-01757-x10.1007/s00284-019-01757-x ↗
29. Conley R. T. · 1972
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.02910.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.029 ↗
31. 10.1039/b717046g10.1039/b717046g ↗
32. 10.1021/la049043+10.1021/la049043+ ↗
33. Ojeda J. J. · 2012 · 18710.1007/978-1-61779-827-6_8 ↗
34. 10.1021/la702284b10.1021/la702284b ↗
35. 10.1021/ac900841c10.1021/ac900841c ↗
36. 10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.10110.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.101 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0964-8305(98)80002-410.1016/S0964-8305(98)80002-4 ↗
38. Wade L. G. · 1995
39. 10.1021/es034668010.1021/es0346680 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)80455-510.1016/S0010-8545(00)80455-5 ↗
41. 10.1021/la904120s10.1021/la904120s ↗