journal article·2023-12-05Open access

Physiological Concentrations of Calcium Interact with Alginate and Extracellular DNA in the Matrices of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms to Impede Phagocytosis by Neutrophils

Marilyn J. Wells, Hailey Currie, Vernita D. Gordon

Langmuir· Volume 39· Issue 48

Abstract

Biofilms are communities of interacting microbes embedded in a matrix of polymer, protein, and other materials. Biofilms develop distinct mechanical characteristics that depend on their predominant matrix components. These matrix components may be produced by microbes themselves or, for infections in vivo, incorporated from the host environment. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( P. aeruginosa ) is a human pathogen that forms robust biofilms that extensively tolerate antibiotics and effectively evade clearance by the immune system. Two of the important bacterial-produced polymers in the matrices of P. aeruginosa biofilms are alginate and extracellular DNA (eDNA), both of which are anionic and therefore have the potential to interact electrostatically with cations. Many physiological sites of infection contain significant concentrations of the calcium ion (Ca 2+ ). In this study, we investigate the structural and mechanical impacts of Ca 2+ supplementation in alginate-dominated biofilms grown in vitro, and we evaluate the impact of targeted enzyme treatments on clearance by immune cells. We use multiple-particle tracking microrheology to evaluate the changes in biofilm viscoelasticity caused by treatment with alginate lyase or DNase I. For biofilms grown without Ca 2+, we correlate a decrease in relative elasticity with increased phagocytic success. However, we find that growth with Ca 2+ supplementation disrupts this correlation except in the case where both enzymes are applied. This suggests that the calcium cation may be impacting the microstructure of the biofilm in nontrivial ways. Indeed, confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy reveal unique Ca 2+ -dependent eDNA and alginate microstructures. Our results suggest that the presence of Ca 2+ drives the formation of structurally and compositionally discrete microdomains within the biofilm through electrostatic interactions with the anionic matrix components eDNA and alginate. Further, we observe that these structures serve a protective function as the dissolution of both components is required to render biofilm bacteria vulnerable to phagocytosis by neutrophils.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, 2515 Speedway, C1600, Austin, Texas 78712-1192, United States

Center for Nonlinear Dynamics, The University of Texas at Austin, 2515 Speedway, Stop C1610, Austin, Texas 78712-11993, United States

Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Graduate Program, The University of Texas at Austin, Norman Hackerman Building, 100 East 24th St., NHB 4500, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

LaMontagne Center for Infectious Disease, The University of Texas at Austin, Neural Molecular Science Building, 2506 Speedway, Stop A5000, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · National Science Foundation

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1093/jpids/piac05210.1093/jpids/piac052 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.284.5418.131810.1126/science.284.5418.1318 ↗
3. Martin I. · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2021 · 2210.3390/ijms22042155 ↗
4. 10.1093/jpids/piac07310.1093/jpids/piac073 ↗
5. 10.2217/fmb.10.12510.2217/fmb.10.125 ↗
6. 10.1186/1471-2180-14-19110.1186/1471-2180-14-191 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.01410.1016/j.chom.2019.03.014 ↗
8. 10.1371/journal.pone.025702610.1371/journal.pone.0257026 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41522-016-0007-910.1038/s41522-016-0007-9 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41598-020-73459-510.1038/s41598-020-73459-5 ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.11565310.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115653 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.109238510.1126/science.1092385 ↗
13. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.63182110.3389/fimmu.2021.631821 ↗
14. 10.3390/pathogens601001010.3390/pathogens6010010 ↗
15. 10.1371/journal.ppat.100021310.1371/journal.ppat.1000213 ↗
16. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0289410.3389/fmicb.2019.02894 ↗
17. 10.1111/1462-2920.1215510.1111/1462-2920.12155 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-210.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2 ↗
19. 10.1039/D1SM00463H10.1039/D1SM00463H ↗
20. 10.1371/journal.ppat.100905410.1371/journal.ppat.1009054 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.10001710.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100017 ↗
22. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa6b8310.1088/1361-6463/aa6b83 ↗
23. 10.1111/2049-632X.1211810.1111/2049-632X.12118 ↗
24. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.110219910.3389/fcimb.2023.1102199 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41522-022-00311-110.1038/s41522-022-00311-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.04310.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.043 ↗
27. 10.1063/5.005707110.1063/5.0057071 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0218810.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02188 ↗
29. 10.1099/acmi.0.000470.v310.1099/acmi.0.000470.v3 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.328210.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3282 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.125010.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1250 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.02150110.1103/PhysRevE.76.021501 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.01610.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 ↗
35. 10.1083/jcb.20130717210.1083/jcb.201307172 ↗
36. 10.1080/21655979.2015.103054310.1080/21655979.2015.1030543 ↗
37. 10.1128/AAC.42.4.97410.1128/AAC.42.4.974 ↗
38. 10.1002/mabi.20130013410.1002/mabi.201300134 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.03.05110.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.03.051 ↗
40. Converter between molecular weight (kDa) and hydrodynamic radius (nm). 2023; Available from: https://www.fluidic.com/toolkit/hydrodynamic-radius-converter/.
41. Teirlinck, E. Functionalized Nanomaterials for the Management of Microbial Infection. 2017, Elsevier. p 49–76.10.1016/B978-0-323-41625-2.00003-X ↗
42. 10.1128/mBio.01536-1410.1128/mBio.01536-14 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.10423410.1016/j.isci.2022.104234 ↗
44. 10.1128/jb.00568-2110.1128/jb.00568-21 ↗
45. 10.1371/journal.pone.009193510.1371/journal.pone.0091935 ↗
46. 10.1128/JB.187.13.4327-4337.200510.1128/JB.187.13.4327-4337.2005 ↗
47. 10.1021/la703622910.1021/la7036229 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0141010.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01410 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.10878210.1016/j.celrep.2021.108782 ↗
50. 10.1073/pnas.180600511510.1073/pnas.1806005115 ↗
51. 10.1073/pnas.121889811010.1073/pnas.1218898110 ↗
52. 10.1002/bit.2776010.1002/bit.27760 ↗
53. 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3693-3701.200510.1128/IAI.73.6.3693-3701.2005 ↗
54. 10.1136/thx.47.1.610.1136/thx.47.1.6 ↗
55. 10.1128/JB.183.18.5395-5401.200110.1128/JB.183.18.5395-5401.2001 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.150305811210.1073/pnas.1503058112 ↗
57. 10.3390/ijms24141168010.3390/ijms241411680 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0053810.1021/acsabm.2c00538 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41598-021-82992-w10.1038/s41598-021-82992-w ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.06.01410.1016/j.jconrel.2020.06.014 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11111610.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111116 ↗
62. 10.3390/ijms2024629710.3390/ijms20246297 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsami.9b1145310.1021/acsami.9b11453 ↗
64. 10.1039/D0BM00155D10.1039/D0BM00155D ↗
65. 10.1039/D1BM01580J10.1039/D1BM01580J ↗
66. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0037110.1021/acsomega.7b00371 ↗
67. 10.1116/1.504745310.1116/1.5047453 ↗