Cavitation Rheology of Model Yield Stress Fluids Based on Carbopol
Source abstract
Abstract
Measuring the surface tension of yield stress fluids has remained a critical challenge due to limitations of the traditional tensiometry techniques. Here, we overcome those limits and successfully measure the surface tension and mechanical properties of a model yield stress fluid based on Carbopol gels via a needle-induced cavitation (NIC) technique. Our results indicate that the surface tension is approximately 70 ± 3 mN/m, and is independent of the rheology of yield stress fluid over a wide range of yield stress values σ y = 0.5–120 Pa. In addition, we demonstrate that a Young modulus smaller than E < 1 kPa can be successfully measured for Carbopol gels with NIC method. Finally, we present a time-resolved flow structure around the cavity in a host of yield stress fluids, and assess the impact of fluid rheology on the detailed form of flow around the cavity. Interestingly, prior to the critical point associated with cavitation, the yield stress fluid is weakly deformed suggesting that the measured surface tension data reflect the near equilibrium values. Beyond the critical point, the yield stress fluid experiences a strong flow that is controlled by both the critical pressure and the non-Newtonian rheology of the yield stress fluid.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Blood properties and coagulation · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cocis.2019.03.00210.1016/j.cocis.2019.03.002 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-14142410.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141424 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.05.00610.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.05.006 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00397-016-0963-210.1007/s00397-016-0963-2 ↗
5. 10.1122/8.000016310.1122/8.0000163 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cis.2015.03.00210.1016/j.cis.2015.03.002 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat261510.1038/nmat2615 ↗
8. 10.1039/c4sm00081a10.1039/c4sm00081a ↗
9. Bingham E. · 1922
10. 10.1073/pnas.191936311710.1073/pnas.1919363117 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.02010.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.020 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.10453110.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.104531 ↗
13. 10.1002/aic.1573110.1002/aic.15731 ↗
14. 10.1006/jcis.2001.766510.1006/jcis.2001.7665 ↗
15. Israelachvili J. N. · 2011
16. 10.1016/0894-1777(91)90079-710.1016/0894-1777(91)90079-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0894-1777(01)00060-710.1016/S0894-1777(01)00060-7 ↗
18. 10.1209/0295-5075/107/5800210.1209/0295-5075/107/58002 ↗
19. 10.1039/c3sm50551k10.1039/c3sm50551k ↗
20. 10.1039/C5SM00569H10.1039/C5SM00569H ↗
21. 10.1122/1.499534810.1122/1.4995348 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00397-011-0614-610.1007/s00397-011-0614-6 ↗
23. 10.1515/revce-2020-001610.1515/revce-2020-0016 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0235310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02353 ↗
25. 10.1122/1.157402310.1122/1.1574023 ↗
26. 10.1122/1.159509810.1122/1.1595098 ↗
27. 10.1039/c1sm05740e10.1039/c1sm05740e ↗
28. 10.1063/5.005054110.1063/5.0050541 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.193822710.1063/1.1938227 ↗
30. 10.1021/j100890a02410.1021/j100890a024 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.04710.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.047 ↗
32. 10.1016/0166-6622(90)80291-B10.1016/0166-6622(90)80291-B ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.01010.1016/j.cis.2003.10.010 ↗
34. Simon, M. InAnnales de Chimie et de Physique; 1851; Vol. 32, p 5.
35. 10.1016/0095-8522(61)90028-910.1016/0095-8522(61)90028-9 ↗
36. 10.1016/0021-9797(67)90091-410.1016/0021-9797(67)90091-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/0021-9797(81)90051-510.1016/0021-9797(81)90051-5 ↗
38. 10.1021/la00070a00910.1021/la00070a009 ↗
39. 10.1021/la00086a02710.1021/la00086a027 ↗
40. Fainerman, V.; Miller, R. InStudies in Interface Science; Elsevier: 1998; Vol. 6, pp 279–326.10.1016/S1383-7303(98)80023-9 ↗
41. 10.1039/CT922210085810.1039/CT9222100858 ↗
42. 10.1016/0021-9797(71)90116-010.1016/0021-9797(71)90116-0 ↗
43. 10.1021/la030271y10.1021/la030271y ↗
44. 10.1039/b617050a10.1039/b617050a ↗
45. 10.1039/b909237d10.1039/b909237d ↗
46. 10.1039/b925407b10.1039/b925407b ↗
47. 10.1073/pnas.192016811710.1073/pnas.1920168117 ↗
48. 10.1039/c1sm05340j10.1039/c1sm05340j ↗
49. 10.1039/c2sm25458a10.1039/c2sm25458a ↗
50. 10.1039/C5SM02055G10.1039/C5SM02055G ↗
51. 10.1039/C9SM01173K10.1039/C9SM01173K ↗
52. 10.1063/1.165802610.1063/1.1658026 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.018 ↗
54. 10.1122/8.000001010.1122/8.0000010 ↗
55. 10.1122/8.000043610.1122/8.0000436 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.11400210.1103/PhysRevLett.130.114002 ↗
57. 10.1122/8.000045210.1122/8.0000452 ↗
58. 10.1098/rspa.2001.092410.1098/rspa.2001.0924 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.87014310.1063/1.870143 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.01210.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.012 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.03310.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.033 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.489610810.1063/1.4896108 ↗
63. 10.1088/0959-5309/57/3/30110.1088/0959-5309/57/3/301 ↗
64. Asaro R. · 200610.1017/CBO9780511755514 ↗
65. Hill R. · 199810.1093/oso/9780198503675.001.0001 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.12330110.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.123301 ↗