journal article·2017-10-31

Tension Independence of Lipid Diffusion and Membrane Viscosity

Vincent L. Thoms, Tristan T. Hormel, Matthew A. Reyer, Raghuveer Parthasarathy

Langmuir· Volume 33· Issue 43
Publisher page

Abstract

The diffusion of biomolecules at lipid membranes is governed by the viscosity of the underlying two-dimensionally fluid lipid bilayer. For common three-dimensional fluids, viscosity can be modulated by hydrostatic pressure, and pressure-viscosity data have been measured for decades. Remarkably, the two-dimensional analogue of this relationship, the dependence of molecular mobility on tension, has to the best of our knowledge never been measured for lipid bilayers, limiting our understanding of cellular mechanotransduction as well as the fundamental fluid mechanics of membranes. Here we report both molecular-scale and mesoscopic measures of fluidity in giant lipid vesicles as a function of mechanical tension applied using micropipette aspiration. Both molecular-scale data, from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, and micron-scale data, from tracking the diffusion of phase-separated domains, show a surprisingly weak dependence of viscosity on tension, in contrast to predictions of recent molecular dynamics simulations, highlighting fundamental gaps in our understanding of membrane fluidity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Materials Science Institute, The University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1274, United States

Funding

Division of Materials Research

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Bridgman P. W. · 1931
2. Stephan K. · 197910.1007/978-1-4757-6931-9 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.185151010.1063/1.1851510 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.169989410.1063/1.1699894 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.173056610.1063/1.1730566 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.175.4023.72010.1126/science.175.4023.720 ↗
7. 10.1016/0014-5793(84)81157-610.1016/0014-5793(84)81157-6 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp070208810.1021/jp0702088 ↗
9. 10.1039/c2sm25796c10.1039/c2sm25796c ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.01710.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.017 ↗
11. 10.1021/bi00144a01310.1021/bi00144a013 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0187289210.1007/BF01872892 ↗
13. 10.1039/C0CP00430H10.1039/C0CP00430H ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.05.00610.1016/j.bbamem.2012.05.006 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.72.8.311110.1073/pnas.72.8.3111 ↗
16. 10.1017/S002211208100078510.1017/S0022112081000785 ↗
17. Hamill O. P. · Physiol. Rev. · 2001 · 81 · 68510.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.685 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature0099210.1038/nature00992 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84817-510.1016/S0006-3495(81)84817-5 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.209410.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2094 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.02190810.1103/PhysRevE.64.021908 ↗
22. 10.1140/epje/i2003-10146-y10.1140/epje/i2003-10146-y ↗
23. 10.1021/ja907936c10.1021/ja907936c ↗
24. 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79577-210.1016/S0006-3495(96)79577-2 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.091366910710.1073/pnas.0913669107 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-210.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.01310.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.013 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76295-310.1016/S0006-3495(00)76295-3 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-1-59745-513-8_610.1007/978-1-59745-513-8_6 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.14810110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.148101 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.070297010510.1073/pnas.0702970105 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.26570210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.265702 ↗
33. 10.1529/biophysj.107.12554210.1529/biophysj.107.125542 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.02272610.1103/PhysRevE.89.022726 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp902877y10.1021/jp902877y ↗
36. 10.1021/bi00324a03710.1021/bi00324a037 ↗
37. 10.1529/biophysj.104.04136810.1529/biophysj.104.041368 ↗