journal article·2022-05Open access

Highly Efficient, Dendrite‐Free Zinc Electrodeposition in Mild Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries through Indium‐Based Substrates

Michele Tribbia, Jens Glenneberg, Giorgia Zampardi, Fabio La Mantia

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Quasi‐neutral aqueous zinc‐ion (Zn‐ion) batteries are nowadays among the most promising energy storage devices for smart‐grid applications. However, their practical use remains hindered by the low Zn electrodeposition efficiency at the negative electrode, which is especially reduced due to the parasitic evolution of gaseous hydrogen. Indium is a non‐toxic metal showing poor hydrogen evolution kinetics, but it is also very expensive. Therefore, an optimized mixture of bismuth and indium particles has been used as the substrate for the Zn electrodeposition and dissolution reaction to increase its reversibility and its efficiency in a quasi‐neutral ZnSO4 solution. This strategy not only allowed to prolong the cycle life of a full Zn‐ion cell of 10 times at 0.5 C due to the suppression of the hydrogen evolution reaction, as proved by the operando DEMS analysis, but also led to very homogeneous zinc deposits over prolonged cycling at realistic charge and current densities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Energiespeicher- und Energiewandlersysteme Universität Bremen Bibliothekstraße 1 28359 Bremen Germany

Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials – IFAM Wiener Str. 12 28359 Bremen Germany

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adsu.20180011110.1002/adsu.201800111 ↗
2. 10.1002/adsu.20190014510.1002/adsu.201900145 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0142610.1021/acsenergylett.8b01426 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.01.01410.1016/j.coelec.2020.01.014 ↗
5. 10.1039/C9TA06433H10.1039/C9TA06433H ↗
6. 10.1039/D0SC00022A10.1039/D0SC00022A ↗
7. 10.1039/C9EE02526J10.1039/C9EE02526J ↗
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0155210.1021/acsenergylett.8b01552 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.03.00610.1016/j.ensm.2019.03.006 ↗
10. 10.1002/celc.20200088610.1002/celc.202000886 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)82175-110.1016/S0020-1693(00)82175-1 ↗
12. Yu P. · Small · 2019 · 15 · 1
13. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)80401-310.1016/0022-0728(93)80401-3 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10008-020-04539-910.1007/s10008-020-04539-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20200126310.1002/adfm.202001263 ↗
16. Hao J. · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 1
17. 10.1002/anie.20190783010.1002/anie.201907830 ↗
18. 10.1002/ange.20190783010.1002/ange.201907830 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.0141508jes10.1149/2.0141508jes ↗
20. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0408510.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04085 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.065 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0106310.1021/acsaem.9b01063 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20180109010.1002/aenm.201801090 ↗
24. Zhao K. · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 5 · 1
25. 10.1021/acsami.8b0778110.1021/acsami.8b07781 ↗
26. 10.1002/celc.20180029110.1002/celc.201800291 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20181322310.1002/anie.201813223 ↗
28. 10.1002/ange.20181322310.1002/ange.201813223 ↗
29. Cheng Y. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 2
30. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.01210.1016/j.joule.2019.02.012 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.6b1656010.1021/acsami.6b16560 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.11610.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.116 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.6b0159210.1021/acsami.6b01592 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z ↗
35. 10.1039/C9EE00596J10.1039/C9EE00596J ↗
36. 10.1002/cssc.20190140910.1002/cssc.201901409 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20190377810.1002/adma.201903778 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.15510.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.155 ↗
39. 10.1002/batt.20200012410.1002/batt.202000124 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0213810.1021/acs.analchem.6b02138 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0022-0728(72)80485-610.1016/S0022-0728(72)80485-6 ↗
42. 10.1039/c3dt51638e10.1039/c3dt51638e ↗
43. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.04.00610.1016/j.elecom.2016.04.006 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.8b1628410.1021/acsami.8b16284 ↗
45. Li Z. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 9 · 1
46. M. Pourbaix Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions National Association of Corrosion Engineers Houston 1974.10.1007/978-1-4684-1806-4_4 ↗
47. Institut für seltene Erden und strategische Metalle “Prices for strategic metals in December 2020 ” can be found underhttps://en.institut-seltene-erden.de/our-service-2/Metal-prices/strategic-metals-prices/ 2020.
48. Institut für seltene Erden und strategische Metalle “Base metals prices in December 2020 ” can be found underhttps://en.institut-seltene-erden.de/our-service-2/Metal-prices/Base-metals-prices/ 2020.
49. A. J. Bard L. R. Faulkner Electrochemical Methods Fundamentals and Applications 2ndedition Wiley New York 2000.
50. 10.1016/j.elecom.2021.10703010.1016/j.elecom.2021.107030 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.08.01910.1016/j.elecom.2015.08.019 ↗
52. 10.1039/C7TA05347A10.1039/C7TA05347A ↗
53. 10.1038/ncomms1442410.1038/ncomms14424 ↗
54. Han D. · Small · 2020 · 16 · 1
55. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13064310.1016/j.cej.2021.130643 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.10.00110.1016/j.elecom.2017.10.001 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.06710.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.067 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.11610.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.116 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12536310.1016/j.cej.2020.125363 ↗
60. 10.1039/C7CP05453J10.1039/C7CP05453J ↗
61. 10.1002/batt.20190017710.1002/batt.201900177 ↗
62. 10.1039/C5RA02940F10.1039/C5RA02940F ↗
63. 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.05.01310.1016/j.elecom.2015.05.013 ↗
64. A. Bani Hashemi Electrochemical and Morphological Characterization of the Interface At Negative Electrodes in Aqueous Metal-Ion Batteries PhD thesis Universität Bremen (DE) 2018.10.1002/celc.201800867 ↗
65. 10.1149/1.320549510.1149/1.3205495 ↗