β-Cyclodextrin/Azobenzene Microspheres Loaded with Paraquat Are Safe and Effective
Source abstract
Abstract
Although paraquat is a widely used herbicide, it is toxic to humans if ingested or absorbed through an open wound. To improve the safety of paraquat, a new formulation of paraquat based on photoresponsive polymers was exploited. Photoresponsive β-cyclodextrin polymer microspheres (AZO-CD) were synthesized via a host-guest interaction between β-cyclodextrin and azobenzene. AZO-CD were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry, circular dichroism, ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometry, and thermogravimetric analysis, and their photoresponsiveness was also evaluated. AZO-CD were used to load paraquat, which yielded photoresponsive paraquat-loaded microspheres. For the paraquat-loaded microspheres, irradiation with UV light or sunlight induced the isomerization of azobenzene into the cis form. Then, the cis-azobenzene was liberated from the cavities of the β-cyclodextrin. The paraquat-loaded microspheres released paraquat continuously over time. Furthermore, under UV light, the herbicidal capacity of the paraquat-loaded microspheres against barnyard grass was comparable to that of free paraquat at the same dose. Our findings show that loading paraquat into AZO-CD provides a safe and environmentally friendly herbicide formulation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Paraquat toxicity studies and treatments · Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis · Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering & Technology Research Center for Bio Pesticide and Formulating Processing, College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha410128, China
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fsi.2022.09.02410.1016/j.fsi.2022.09.024 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.10507610.1016/j.tiv.2021.105076 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tox.2020.15263210.1016/j.tox.2020.152632 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.01010.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.010 ↗
5. Donaldson C · 2013 · 73110.1016/B978-1-4557-0717-1.00069-7 ↗
6. 10.1021/jf011323x10.1021/jf011323x ↗
7. 10.1007/s12010-009-8710-010.1007/s12010-009-8710-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.10930110.1016/j.intimp.2022.109301 ↗
9. 10.1186/s12906-022-03567-410.1186/s12906-022-03567-4 ↗
10. 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20000916-0062810.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20000916-00628 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.11813710.1016/j.envpol.2021.118137 ↗
12. 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.85910.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.859 ↗
13. 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.3.24710.3904/kjim.2009.24.3.247 ↗
14. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100035710.1371/journal.pmed.1000357 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02017.x10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02017.x ↗
16. 10.1371/journal.pmed.005004910.1371/journal.pmed.0050049 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-018-05437-510.1038/s41467-018-05437-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13246710.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132467 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13102610.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131026 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10311-020-01156-w10.1007/s10311-020-01156-w ↗
21. 10.1039/C6CC03445D10.1039/C6CC03445D ↗
22. 10.1021/cr500634210.1021/cr5006342 ↗
23. 10.1039/C6CC07089B10.1039/C6CC07089B ↗
24. 10.1039/C6PY02016J10.1039/C6PY02016J ↗
25. 10.1021/ar500109h10.1021/ar500109h ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20161215010.1002/anie.201612150 ↗
27. 10.2174/15672010878395488810.2174/156720108783954888 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11734110.1016/j.molliq.2021.117341 ↗
29. 10.1039/c1py00426c10.1039/c1py00426c ↗
30. 10.1039/C6NJ00728G10.1039/C6NJ00728G ↗
31. 10.1021/ma201676w10.1021/ma201676w ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20060098110.1002/adfm.200600981 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.clay.2022.10669910.1016/j.clay.2022.106699 ↗
34. 10.1155/2020/873085210.1155/2020/8730852 ↗
35. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0226410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02264 ↗
36. 10.1039/C3SM51648B10.1039/C3SM51648B ↗
37. 10.1039/C9PY00793H10.1039/C9PY00793H ↗
38. 10.3390/polym911055310.3390/polym9110553 ↗