journal article·2021-01-26

Electrochemical Stimulation of Water–Oil Interfaces by Nonionic–Cationic Block Copolymer Systems

Quirin Prasser, Daniel Steinbach, Daniel Kodura, Vincent Schildknecht, Katja König, Christian Weber, Erica Brendler, Carla Vogt, Urs Peuker, Christopher Barner-Kowollik, Florian Mertens, Felix H. Schacher, Anja S. Goldmann, Felix A. Plamper

Langmuir· Volume 37· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Variable interfacial tension could be desirable for many applications. Beyond classical stimuli like temperature, we introduce an electrochemical approach employing polymers. Hence, aqueous solutions of the nonionic–cationic block copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)114-b-poly{[2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]diisopropylmethylammonium chloride}171 (i.e., PEO114-b-PDPAEMA171 with a quaternized poly(diisopropylaminoethyl methacrylate) block) were investigated by emerging drop measurements and dynamic light scattering, analyzing the PEO114-b-qPDPAEMA171 impact on the interfacial tension between water and n-decane and its micellar formation in the aqueous bulk phase. Potassium hexacyanoferrates (HCFs) were used as electroactive complexants for the charged block, which convert the bishydrophilic copolymer into amphiphilic species. Interestingly, ferricyanides ([Fe(CN)6]3–) act as stronger complexants than ferrocyanides ([Fe(CN)6]4–), leading to an insoluble qPDPAEMA block in the presence of ferricyanides. Hence, bulk micellization was demonstrated by light scattering. Due to their addressability, in situ redox experiments were performed to trace the interfacial tension under electrochemical control, directly utilizing a drop shape analyzer. Here, the open-circuit potential (OCP) was changed by electrolysis to vary the ratio between ferricyanides and ferrocyanides in the aqueous solution. While a chemical oxidation/reduction is feasible, also an electrochemical oxidation leads to a significant change in the interfacial tension properties. In contrast, a corresponding electrochemical reduction showed only a slight response after converting ferricyanides to ferrocyanides. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the liquid/liquid interface transferred to a solid substrate showed particles that are in accordance with the diameter from light scattering experiments of the bulk phase. In conclusion, the present results could be an important step toward economic switching of interfaces suitable, e.g., for emulsion breakage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Physical Chemistry, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany

Centre for Materials Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Institute of Organic Chemistry and Macromolecular Chemistry (IOMC), Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, D-07743 Jena, Germany

Jena Center for Soft Matter (JCSM), Friedrich Schiller University Jena, D-07743 Jena, Germany

Institute of Mechanical Process Engineering and Mineral Processing, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Agricolastraße 1, 09599 Freiberg, Germany

Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany

Institute of Analytical Chemistry, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Straße 29, 09599 Freiberg, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Australian Research Council · Queensland University of Technology

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20120031010.1002/anie.201200310 ↗
2. 10.1517/17425247.3.1.13910.1517/17425247.3.1.139 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.00610.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.11.00910.1016/j.ejpb.2006.11.009 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-0294(96)80118-X10.1016/S1359-0294(96)80118-X ↗
6. 10.1039/c3cp50620g10.1039/c3cp50620g ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.7b0159610.1021/jacs.7b01596 ↗
8. 10.1021/la034786110.1021/la0347861 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.10010.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.100 ↗
10. 10.1021/ma300195n10.1021/ma300195n ↗
11. 10.1021/jp508711k10.1021/jp508711k ↗
12. 10.1039/b822143j10.1039/b822143j ↗
13. 10.1021/ma901389d10.1021/ma901389d ↗
14. Fleer, G. J. Polymers at Interfaces; Repr; Chapman & Hall, 1998; p 27.10.1007/978-94-011-2130-9_2 ↗
15. 10.1002/admi.20170020310.1002/admi.201700203 ↗
16. 10.1021/ma302648w10.1021/ma302648w ↗
17. 10.1039/C9SM00368A10.1039/C9SM00368A ↗
18. 10.1016/j.crhy.2014.10.00210.1016/j.crhy.2014.10.002 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5SM00242G10.1039/C5SM00242G ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.04.00110.1016/j.cocis.2010.04.001 ↗
21. Aguilar M. R. · 2019 · 1
22. 10.3390/polym1004042910.3390/polym10040429 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00858-110.1016/S0032-3861(98)00858-1 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00396-009-2028-x10.1007/s00396-009-2028-x ↗
25. 10.1039/C6PY01612J10.1039/C6PY01612J ↗
26. 10.1021/ma992016j10.1021/ma992016j ↗
27. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.181-182.8810.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.181-182.88 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma801725w10.1021/ma801725w ↗
29. 10.1002/pola.2752910.1002/pola.27529 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.003 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20120170810.1002/adfm.201201708 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0274010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02740 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0266610.1021/acs.macromol.9b02666 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0105410.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01054 ↗
35. 10.1039/c3sm52241e10.1039/c3sm52241e ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0089710.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00897 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.0c0057710.1021/acsami.0c00577 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.283.5398.5710.1126/science.283.5398.57 ↗
39. 10.1021/la00025a01910.1021/la00025a019 ↗
40. 10.1002/admi.20160046110.1002/admi.201600461 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.10210.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.102 ↗
42. 10.1039/C8SC04369H10.1039/C8SC04369H ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.6b0992010.1021/acsami.6b09920 ↗
44. 10.14314/polimery.2014.06610.14314/polimery.2014.066 ↗
45. 10.1021/j100363a01710.1021/j100363a017 ↗
46. 10.1021/la500758310.1021/la5007583 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.06.08310.1016/j.tsf.2012.06.083 ↗
48. 10.1039/c003294h10.1039/c003294h ↗
49. 10.1021/ma001550k10.1021/ma001550k ↗
50. Necas D. · Cent. Eur. J. Phys. · 2012 · 10 · 181
51. Biodegradable and Biocompatible Polymer Composites: Processing, Properties and Applications; Woodhead Publishing sEries in Composites Science and Engineering; Shimpi, N. G., Ed. WP Woodhead Publishing an imprint of Elsevier, 2018; p 41.
52. 10.1021/ma00182a03510.1021/ma00182a035 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.89910.1103/PhysRevLett.66.899 ↗
54. 10.1002/anie.20180459710.1002/anie.201804597 ↗
55. 10.1007/BF0097267710.1007/BF00972677 ↗
56. 10.1039/C4SM01724B10.1039/C4SM01724B ↗