Feasibility of Carbon Nanoparticle Coatings as Protective Barriers for Copper─Wetting Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
Copper is extensively used in a wide range of industrial and daily-life applications, varying from heat exchangers to electrical wiring. Although it is protected from oxidation by its native oxide layer, when subjected to harsh environmental conditions─such as in coastal regions─this metal can rapidly degrade. Therefore, in this study, we analyze the potential use of carbon nanoparticle coatings as protective barriers due to their intrinsic hydrophobic wetting behavior. The nanocarbon coatings were produced via electrophoretic deposition on Cu platelets and characterized via scanning electron microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and sessile drop test; the latter being the primary focus since it provides insights into the wetting behavior of the produced coatings. Among the measured coatings, graphite flakes, graphene oxide, and carbon nanotube (CNT) coatings showed superhydrophobic behavior. Based on their wetting behavior, and specifically for electrical applications, CNT coatings showed the most promising results since these coatings do not significantly impact the substrate's electrical conductivity. Although CNT agglomerates do not affect the wetting behavior of the attained coatings, the coating's thickness plays an important role. Therefore, to completely coat the substrate, the CNT coating should be sufficiently thick─above approximately 1 μm.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair Functional Materials, Saarland University, Campus D3.3, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany
International Laboratory of Environmental Electron Devices (LAIDEA), ENES Morelia UNAM, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Morelia 58190, Mexico
Funding
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst · European Regional Development Fund · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · State of Saarland
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.140940010.1149/1.1409400 ↗
2. Díaz León, J. J.; Fryauf, D. M.; Cormia, R. D.; Kobayashi, N. P. Study of the Formation of Native Oxide on Copper at Room Temperature. Low-Dimensional Materials and Devices 2016, 2016; Vol. 9924, p 99240O.10.1117/12.2238745 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.212740310.1149/1.2127403 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0066466410.1007/BF00664664 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp076981k10.1021/jp076981k ↗
6. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.02110.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.021 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.208595710.1149/1.2085957 ↗
8. Pareek S. · 2021 · 43 · 3303
9. 10.1021/acsami.1c1580810.1021/acsami.1c15808 ↗
10. Birn J. · 2007 · 310.1533/9781845693084.1.3 ↗
11. 10.1179/00070598979827038810.1179/000705989798270388 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.01510.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.015 ↗
13. 10.3390/met1107108010.3390/met11071080 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.10.05910.1016/j.electacta.2006.10.059 ↗
15. Nakajima A. · 2001 · 3110.1007/978-3-7091-6276-7_3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.00310.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.003 ↗
17. 10.1116/1.511613610.1116/1.5116136 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cartre.2022.10015610.1016/j.cartre.2022.100156 ↗
19. Dickerson J. H. · 201210.1007/978-1-4419-9730-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.02110.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.021 ↗
21. 10.1080/09506608.2020.183129910.1080/09506608.2020.1831299 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08929.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08929.x ↗
23. 10.1039/c5ra14310a10.1039/c5ra14310a ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmat.2018.02.00410.1016/j.jmat.2018.02.004 ↗
25. 10.1039/TF940350027910.1039/TF9403500279 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05402.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05402.x ↗
27. 10.1002/adem.20200144810.1002/adem.202001448 ↗
28. 10.1088/2051-672X/aab14510.1088/2051-672X/aab145 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0044710.1021/acs.accounts.6b00447 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.00210.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.002 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0286610.1021/acsomega.8b02866 ↗
32. Karfa P. · 2019 · 12310.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11225-1 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.6b1211910.1021/acsami.6b12119 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.05510.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.055 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01707-210.1016/S0040-6090(01)01707-2 ↗
36. 10.1021/la305032k10.1021/la305032k ↗
37. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/14/14570110.1088/0957-4484/26/14/145701 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.07110.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.071 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0071810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00718 ↗
40. Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB). PubChem Annotation Record for TRIETHYLAMINE; Natoinal Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/source/hsdb/896#section=Human-Health-Effects (accessed July 19, 2022).
41. Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB). PubChem Annotation Record for ISOPROPANOL; Natoinal Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/source/hsdb/116 (accessed July 20, 2022).
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.07110.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.071 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12650310.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126503 ↗
44. 10.1021/la404906710.1021/la4049067 ↗
45. 10.3390/lubricants708006210.3390/lubricants7080062 ↗
46. 10.1002/pssa.20143101810.1002/pssa.201431018 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja073745e10.1021/ja073745e ↗
48. 10.1515/pm-2021-003910.1515/pm-2021-0039 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.1c0973310.1021/acsami.1c09733 ↗
50. 10.1039/b407770a10.1039/b407770a ↗
51. 10.4236/acs.2017.7100210.4236/acs.2017.71002 ↗
52. Wang M.-J. · 2003
53. 10.1126/science.261.5128.154510.1126/science.261.5128.1545 ↗
54. 10.1021/la500513x10.1021/la500513x ↗
55. 10.3390/ma1303059510.3390/ma13030595 ↗
56. 10.1021/la048630s10.1021/la048630s ↗
57. Elmogahzy Y. E. · 2020
58. 10.1021/la503049m10.1021/la503049m ↗