journal article·2023-01-31

Investigation of Oil–Water Separation on an F-SiO2/TiO2-Based Superhydrophobic/Superoleophilic Surface: Experiment Evaluation and MD Simulation

Chen Li, Yan Xiong, Lei Zhao, Haiqin Wan, Jun Li, Shenwen Fang, Meng Wang, Ming Duan, Jintian Ren, Yi Xiao

Langmuir· Volume 39· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Experiment evaluation and mechanism analysis of separation performance are crucial for oily wastewater treatment. In this work, a fluorinated superhydrophobic/superoleophilic (F-SHPB/SOPL) surface was fabricated on a steel mesh substrate by double depositions of SiO 2 –TiO 2 nanoparticles for high-roughness improvement and composite modification of fluorine-alkyl groups for low-energy achievement. Measurements of SEM, XPS, FTIR, laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM), and excitation–emission matrix (EEM) were carried out for surface property characterization. The oil–water separation performances at the prepared F-SHPB/SOPL surface were investigated from experimental and simulation aspects. Separation tests, flux tests, and anti-contamination tests were performed by experimental methods. The results indicated that the surface showed excellent separation efficiencies (>99.2%) for oil–water mixture and oil-in-water emulsion, high permeate flux (>3000 L·m –2 ·h –1 ) for organic oils, and perfect anti-pollution/self-cleaning capacity for liquid and solid contaminations. The interaction energies and interaction distances were measured by ab initio molecular dynamics simulation (AIMD) simulations. With lower interaction energy ( E oil = −456.52∼−1044.22 eV) than that of water molecules ( E water = −172.73 eV) and shorter distance ( D oil = 4.42∼5.13 Å) than that of water molecules ( D water = 11.49 Å), oil molecules showed higher interaction stability than water molecules on the F-SHPB/SOPL surface. The calculation revealed the essence of the oil–water separation phenomenon. This work not only proposes the fabrication methodology of the SHPB/SOPL material but also elucidates the intermolecular interaction for oil–water separation. The results can provide a fundamental basis for separation operation and removal treatment in industrial and domestic applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu610500, China

Oil & Gas Field Applied Chemistry Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu610500, China

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emissions Control, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing210023, PR China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Oil and Gas Field Applied Chemistry Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province · Sichuan Science and Technology Program

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14769010.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147690 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0TA02997A10.1039/D0TA02997A ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12909910.1016/j.cej.2021.129099 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13090410.1016/j.cej.2021.130904 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13130210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131302 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.1c1538010.1021/acsami.1c15380 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.12026710.1016/j.seppur.2021.120267 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14794810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147948 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.114832610.1126/science.1148326 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14459810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144598 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20140578510.1002/anie.201405785 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20110261610.1002/adma.201102616 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0065810.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00658 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.15910.1016/j.cej.2017.06.159 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.22010.1016/j.cej.2019.03.220 ↗
16. 10.1039/C3CS60415B10.1039/C3CS60415B ↗
17. 10.1021/am500043210.1021/am5000432 ↗
18. 10.1021/la801040z10.1021/la801040z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13192010.1016/j.cej.2021.131920 ↗
20. 10.1098/rstl.1805.000510.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
21. 10.1039/tf944400054610.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
22. 10.1039/C4RA10655E10.1039/C4RA10655E ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0506610.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05066 ↗
24. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0083410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00834 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.07410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.074 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.05910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.059 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.07310.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.073 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.10550110.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105501 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0005210.1021/acs.iecr.9b00052 ↗
30. 10.1021/la301283m10.1021/la301283m ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.02710.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.027 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.01610.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.05.00810.1016/j.polymer.2011.05.008 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0640410.1021/acsnano.5b06404 ↗
35. 10.1021/am401582d10.1021/am401582d ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.12.06010.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.12.060 ↗
37. 10.1021/ie50320a02410.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
38. 10.1039/C7CE00471K10.1039/C7CE00471K ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.14110.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.141 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10553810.1016/j.jece.2021.105538 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11640010.1016/j.seppur.2019.116400 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11417410.1016/j.molliq.2020.114174 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.0c1882510.1021/acsami.0c18825 ↗
44. 10.1021/ac048199b10.1021/ac048199b ↗
45. 10.1039/c3an36591c10.1039/c3an36591c ↗
46. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.025 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0812110.1021/acsnano.7b08121 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.susc.2008.10.00910.1016/j.susc.2008.10.009 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.10910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.109 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0677510.1021/acsomega.1c06775 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0042910.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00429 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12914210.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129142 ↗
56. 10.3390/nano1214251010.3390/nano12142510 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12186010.1016/j.seppur.2022.121860 ↗
58. 10.1007/s10853-020-05729-610.1007/s10853-020-05729-6 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.18910.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.189 ↗
60. 10.1021/la901906h10.1021/la901906h ↗