Impact of Bioactive Peptide Motifs on Molecular Structure, Charging, and Nonfouling Properties of Poly(ethylene oxide) Brushes
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymer layers capable of suppressing protein adsorption from biological media while presenting extracellular matrix-derived peptide motifs offer valuable new options for biomimetic surface engineering. Herein, we provide detailed insights into physicochemical changes induced in a nonfouling poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) brush/polydopamine (PDA) system by incorporation of adhesion ligand (RGD) peptides. Brushes with high surface chain densities (σ ≥ 0.5 chains·nm–2) and pronounced hydrophilicity (water contact angles ≤ 10°) were prepared by end-tethering of heterobifunctional PEOs (Mn ≈ 20 000 g·mol–1) to PDA-modified surfaces from a reactive melt. Using alkyne distal end group on the PEO chains, azidopentanoic-bearing peptides were coupled through a copper-catalyzed Huisgen azide–alkyne “click” cycloaddition reaction. The surface concentration of RGD was tuned from complete saturation of the PEO surface with peptides (1.7 × 105 fmol·cm–2) to values which may induce distinct differences in cell adhesion (<6.0 × 102 fmol·cm–2). Infrared reflection–absorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies proved the PDA–PEO layers covalent structure and the immobilization of RGD peptides. The complete reconstruction of experimental electrohydrodynamics data utilizing mean-field theory predictions further verified the attained brush structure of the end-tethered PEO chains which provided hydrodynamic screening of the PDA anchor. Increasing the surface concentration of immobilized RGD peptides led to increased interfacial charging. Supported by simulations, this observation was attributed to the ionization of functional groups in the amino acid sequence and to the pH-dependent adsorption of water ions (OH– > H3O+) from the electrolyte. Despite the distinct differences observed in the electrokinetic analysis of the surfaces bearing different amounts of RGD, it was found that the peptide presence on PEO(20 000)–PDA layers does not have a significant effect on the nonfouling properties of the system. Notably, the presented PEO(20 000)–PDA layers bearing RGD peptides in the surface concentration range 5.9 to 1.7 × 105 fmol·cm–2 reduced the protein adsorption from fetal bovine serum to less than 30 ng·cm–2, that is, values comparable to the ones obtained for pristine PEO(20 000)–PDA layers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Heyrovskeho nam. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials Dresden, Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Center of Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Tatzberg 47, 01167 Dresden, Germany
Funding
European Commission · Grantova Agentura Ceske Republiky · Ministerstvo Zdravotnictvi Ceske Republiky
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/smll.20100134110.1002/smll.201001341 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.001 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.090326910710.1073/pnas.0903269107 ↗
4. 10.1038/nbt98110.1038/nbt981 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmeth73610.1038/nmeth736 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn901787210.1021/nn9017872 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat201310.1038/nmat2013 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat305810.1038/nmat3058 ↗
9. 10.2217/17435889.4.1.6510.2217/17435889.4.1.65 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.69710.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20110874610.1002/anie.201108746 ↗
12. 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00259-310.1016/s0142-9612(00)00259-3 ↗
13. 10.1021/la034111y10.1021/la034111y ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.2008210.1002/jbm.a.20082 ↗
15. 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00420-410.1016/s0142-9612(03)00420-4 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp993359m10.1021/jp993359m ↗
17. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.11.12810.1016/j.tsf.2012.11.128 ↗
19. 10.1021/bm200708610.1021/bm2007086 ↗
20. 10.1039/j3970000206310.1039/j39700002063 ↗
21. 10.1021/la302993510.1021/la3029935 ↗
22. 10.1039/c3tb20346h10.1039/c3tb20346h ↗
23. 10.1002/mabi.20120009510.1002/mabi.201200095 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0473110.1021/acs.analchem.6b04731 ↗
25. 10.1529/biophysj.106.08973010.1529/biophysj.106.089730 ↗
26. 10.1126/science.282161910.1126/science.2821619 ↗
27. 10.1006/jcis.1998.578710.1006/jcis.1998.5787 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma00192a05710.1021/ma00192a057 ↗
29. 10.1021/ma950039210.1021/ma9500392 ↗
30. 10.1021/la034974r10.1021/la034974r ↗
31. 10.1021/la049359h10.1021/la049359h ↗
32. 10.1016/s0032-3861(96)00859-210.1016/s0032-3861(96)00859-2 ↗
33. 10.1002/bip.1978.36017071110.1002/bip.1978.360170711 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma00186a05110.1021/ma00186a051 ↗
35. 10.1209/0295-5075/5/5/00610.1209/0295-5075/5/5/006 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cocis.2013.02.00110.1016/j.cocis.2013.02.001 ↗
37. 10.1039/c4sm01315h10.1039/c4sm01315h ↗
38. de Vos, W. M. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 2009.
39. Lyklema J. · 1995 · 2
40. 10.1016/s1389-1723(01)80127-410.1016/s1389-1723(01)80127-4 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja042898o10.1021/ja042898o ↗
42. 10.1007/s11224-013-0206-410.1007/s11224-013-0206-4 ↗
43. MarvinSketch, 5.10.3; ChemAxon, 2012.
44. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.01.00210.1016/j.cocis.2010.01.002 ↗
45. 10.1021/la901190710.1021/la9011907 ↗
46. Koo L. Y. · J. Cell Sci. · 2002 · 115 · 142310.1242/jcs.115.7.1423 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.033 ↗
48. 10.1038/srep0403410.1038/srep04034 ↗
49. 10.1371/journal.pone.002186910.1371/journal.pone.0021869 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.00110.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.001 ↗
51. 10.1016/0166-6622(90)80127-p10.1016/0166-6622(90)80127-p ↗