Proteins and Polyampholytes Interacting with Polyelectrolyte Brushes and Microgels: The Charge Reversal Concept Revised
Source abstract
Abstract
Weak polyampholytes and globular proteins among them can be efficiently absorbed from solutions by polyelectrolyte brushes or microgels even if the net charge of the polyampholyte is of the same sign as that of the brush/microgel. We use a mean-field approach for calculating the free energy of insertion of a probe polyampholyte molecule into a polyelectrolyte brush/microgel. We anticipate that the insertion of the polyampholyte into similarly charged brush/microgel may be thermodynamically favorable due to the gain in the cumulative re-ionization free energy of the pH-sensitive acidic and basic residues. Importantly, we demonstrate that the polyampholyte (protein) charge sign inversion upon transfer from the bulk of the solution to the brush/microgel does not provide sufficient conditions to assure negative re-ionization free energy balance. Thus (in the absence of other driving or stopping mechanisms), charge sign inversion does not necessarily provoke spontaneous absorption of the polyampholyte into the brush/microgel.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Proteins in Food Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, St. Petersburg 197101, Russia
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia
CNRS, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour UMR 5254, Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physico-Chimie pour l’Environnement et les Matériaux, Pau 64000, France
Funding
H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Russian Foundation for Basic Research · Government of the Russian Federation
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Kabanov, V. A. In Macromolecular Complexes in Chemistry and Biology; Dubin, P.; Bock, J.; Davies, R. M.; Schulz, D. N.; Thies, C., Eds. Springer: Berlin, 1994; pp 151–174.
2. 10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00106-310.1016/s0169-409x(97)00106-3 ↗
3. 10.1039/c2cs35135h10.1039/c2cs35135h ↗
4. 10.1021/bm301205510.1021/bm3012055 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.05.01610.1016/j.cocis.2010.05.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.08.00510.1016/j.addr.2011.08.005 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0177510.1021/acs.biomac.8b01775 ↗
8. Birshtein T. M. · Polym. Sci., Ser. C · 2000 · 42 · 172
9. 10.1016/j.cocis.2006.12.00210.1016/j.cocis.2006.12.002 ↗
10. Minko S. · 2006
11. Rühe J. · 2004 · 165 · 79
12. Borisov O. V. · 2011 · 241 · 57
13. 10.1021/ma00010a04310.1021/ma00010a043 ↗
14. 10.1051/jp2:199118610.1051/jp2:1991186 ↗
15. Borisov O. V. · 2011 · 241 · 1
16. 10.1021/ma961126c10.1021/ma961126c ↗
17. 10.1039/b300607g10.1039/b300607g ↗
18. 10.1039/b609879g10.1039/b609879g ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cocis.2011.10.00110.1016/j.cocis.2011.10.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.02710.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.027 ↗
21. 10.1021/la303292z10.1021/la303292z ↗
22. 10.1002/anie.20200645710.1002/anie.202006457 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00396-019-04590-710.1007/s00396-019-04590-7 ↗
24. 10.1021/la063277710.1021/la0632777 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.492807810.1063/1.4928078 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0379710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03797 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0180210.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01802 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp045281210.1021/jp0452812 ↗
29. 10.1021/la902079u10.1021/la902079u ↗
30. 10.1021/ma00109a02110.1021/ma00109a021 ↗
31. 10.1021/ma981501w10.1021/ma981501w ↗
32. 10.1021/la991528o10.1021/la991528o ↗
33. 10.1021/ma048680410.1021/ma0486804 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0128910.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01289 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0026010.1021/acs.macromol.0c00260 ↗
36. 10.1021/la000319x10.1021/la000319x ↗
37. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/32/32300110.1088/0022-3727/49/32/323001 ↗